Application of a new palpometer for intraoral mechanical pain sensitivity assessment.

Takuya Naganawa, Takashi Iida, Lene Baad-Hansen, Tomohiro Ando, Peter Svensson
{"title":"Application of a new palpometer for intraoral mechanical pain sensitivity assessment.","authors":"Takuya Naganawa,&nbsp;Takashi Iida,&nbsp;Lene Baad-Hansen,&nbsp;Tomohiro Ando,&nbsp;Peter Svensson","doi":"10.11607/jop.1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the reliability and magnitude of intraoral mechanical pain sensitivity by using a palpometer with add-on devices with different physical properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Three palpometers (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kg) were used. Add-on devices were put on the circular metal stamp of the palpometer. Four diameters (3, 4, 5, and 10 mm) and two shapes of the rubber-top (flat and round) of the add-on devices were tested at each force level, ie, a total of 24 combinations. Participants were stimulated at the gingival mucosa around the maxillary central incisors and first molars on both sides by using the palpometers in randomized order. Participants rated perceived stimulus intensity on a 0-50-100 numerical rating scale (NRS). Ten volunteers were examined twice on the same day and recalled for a second session for assessment of within- and between-session reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for reliability measures, and NRS scores were analyzed with analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability of NRS scores was excellent (interclass correlation coefficients 0.76 to 0.99). Analysis of NRS values corrected for pressure level revealed that there were main effects of site (P = .006), force (P < .001), size (P < .001), and shape (P < .001) but not side (P = .051).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reliability of intraoral novel palpometer measures of pressure sensitivity was excellent, and sensitivity to pressure stimulation was dependent on the applied force and physical properties of the add-on device. The study indicated that semi-quantitative assessment of intraoral mechanical sensitivity is feasible and could be applied in further studies on different intraoral pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1139","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the reliability and magnitude of intraoral mechanical pain sensitivity by using a palpometer with add-on devices with different physical properties.

Methods: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Three palpometers (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kg) were used. Add-on devices were put on the circular metal stamp of the palpometer. Four diameters (3, 4, 5, and 10 mm) and two shapes of the rubber-top (flat and round) of the add-on devices were tested at each force level, ie, a total of 24 combinations. Participants were stimulated at the gingival mucosa around the maxillary central incisors and first molars on both sides by using the palpometers in randomized order. Participants rated perceived stimulus intensity on a 0-50-100 numerical rating scale (NRS). Ten volunteers were examined twice on the same day and recalled for a second session for assessment of within- and between-session reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for reliability measures, and NRS scores were analyzed with analysis of variance.

Results: Reliability of NRS scores was excellent (interclass correlation coefficients 0.76 to 0.99). Analysis of NRS values corrected for pressure level revealed that there were main effects of site (P = .006), force (P < .001), size (P < .001), and shape (P < .001) but not side (P = .051).

Conclusion: Reliability of intraoral novel palpometer measures of pressure sensitivity was excellent, and sensitivity to pressure stimulation was dependent on the applied force and physical properties of the add-on device. The study indicated that semi-quantitative assessment of intraoral mechanical sensitivity is feasible and could be applied in further studies on different intraoral pain conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型心电计在口腔内机械疼痛敏感性评估中的应用。
目的:通过使用带有不同物理性质附加装置的心压计来研究口腔内机械疼痛敏感性的可靠性和程度。方法:16名健康志愿者参与。使用了三种palpometer(0.5、1.0和2.0 kg)。附加装置被安装在测心压计的圆形金属图章上。附加装置的四种直径(3,4,5和10mm)和两种形状的橡胶顶部(平面和圆形)在每个力水平下进行了测试,即总共24种组合。随机顺序使用测压仪刺激上颌中切牙和两侧第一磨牙周围牙龈黏膜。参与者在0-50-100的数值评定量表(NRS)上对感知到的刺激强度进行评定。10名志愿者在同一天接受了两次测试,并被召回进行第二次测试,以评估测试内和测试间的可靠性。信度测量采用类内相关系数计算,NRS评分采用方差分析。结果:NRS评分信度极好(类间相关系数0.76 ~ 0.99)。对压力水平校正后的NRS值的分析显示,部位(P = 0.006)、力(P < 0.001)、尺寸(P < 0.001)和形状(P < 0.001)是主要影响因素,而侧面(P = 0.051)不是主要影响因素。结论:新型口内心电计测量压力敏感性的可靠性良好,对压力刺激的敏感性取决于附加装置的施加力和物理性质。本研究表明,半定量评估口腔内机械敏感性是可行的,可用于不同口腔内疼痛状况的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Way forward Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review. Why seek treatment for temporomandibular disorder pain complaints? A study based on semi-structured interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1