Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review.

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2022-03-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104
Kenneth A McLean, Stephen R Knight, Thomas M Diehl, Syed Nabeel Zafar, Matt Bouamrane, Ewen M Harrison
{"title":"Development stage of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: protocol of a systematic review.","authors":"Kenneth A McLean,&nbsp;Stephen R Knight,&nbsp;Thomas M Diehl,&nbsp;Syed Nabeel Zafar,&nbsp;Matt Bouamrane,&nbsp;Ewen M Harrison","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The postoperative period represents a time where patients are at a high-risk of morbidity, which warrants effective surveillance. While digital health interventions (DHIs) for postoperative monitoring are promising, a coordinated, standardized and evidence-based approach regarding their implementation and evaluation is currently lacking. This study aimed to identify DHIs implemented and evaluated in postoperative care to highlight research gaps and assess the readiness for routine implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies describing the implementation and evaluation of DHIs for postoperative monitoring published since 2000 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021264289). This will encompass the Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and manual search of bibliographies for relevant studies and gray literature. Methodological reporting quality will be evaluated using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) reporting guideline relevant to the IDEAL stage of the study, and risk of bias will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Data will be extracted according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating DHIs, and a narrative synthesis will be performed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review will assess the readiness for implementation of DHIs for routine postoperative monitoring and will include studies describing best practice from service changes already being piloted out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. This will identify interventions with sufficient evidence to progress to the next IDEAL stage, and promote standardized and comprehensive evaluation of future implementational studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900039/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: The postoperative period represents a time where patients are at a high-risk of morbidity, which warrants effective surveillance. While digital health interventions (DHIs) for postoperative monitoring are promising, a coordinated, standardized and evidence-based approach regarding their implementation and evaluation is currently lacking. This study aimed to identify DHIs implemented and evaluated in postoperative care to highlight research gaps and assess the readiness for routine implementation.

Methods: A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies describing the implementation and evaluation of DHIs for postoperative monitoring published since 2000 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021264289). This will encompass the Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and manual search of bibliographies for relevant studies and gray literature. Methodological reporting quality will be evaluated using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term Follow-up (IDEAL) reporting guideline relevant to the IDEAL stage of the study, and risk of bias will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Data will be extracted according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating DHIs, and a narrative synthesis will be performed.

Discussion: This review will assess the readiness for implementation of DHIs for routine postoperative monitoring and will include studies describing best practice from service changes already being piloted out of necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. This will identify interventions with sufficient evidence to progress to the next IDEAL stage, and promote standardized and comprehensive evaluation of future implementational studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于术后监测的新型数字健康干预措施的发展阶段:系统评价方案。
导言:术后是患者发病的高危期,需要进行有效的监测。虽然用于术后监测的数字健康干预措施(DHIs)很有前景,但目前缺乏一种协调、标准化和基于证据的方法来实施和评估。本研究旨在确定DHIs在术后护理中的实施和评估,以突出研究差距并评估常规实施的准备情况。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价,以确定自2000年以来发表的描述DHIs用于术后监测的实施和评估的研究(PROSPERO ID: CRD42021264289)。这将包括Embase、护理和相关健康文献累积索引、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,以及人工搜索相关研究和灰色文献的书目。方法学报告的质量将使用与研究的理想阶段相关的构想、发展、探索、评估和长期随访(IDEAL)报告指南进行评估,偏倚风险将使用建议、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)框架进行评估。将根据世卫组织监测和评价卫生保健的框架提取数据,并进行叙述综合。讨论:本次审查将评估实施DHIs用于常规术后监测的准备情况,并将包括描述在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间出于必要已经试点的服务变革的最佳实践的研究。这将确定有足够证据的干预措施,以进入理想的下一个阶段,并促进对未来实施研究的标准化和全面评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation. No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1