Serotonin reuptake inhibitor-cognitive behavioural therapy-second generation antipsychotic combination for severe treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. A prospective observational study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-24 DOI:10.1080/13651501.2022.2054351
Antonio Tundo, Loretta Salvati, Luca Cieri, Viviana Balestrini, Daniela Di Spigno, Floriana Orazi, Marica Iommi, Roberta Necci
{"title":"Serotonin reuptake inhibitor-cognitive behavioural therapy-second generation antipsychotic combination for severe treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. A prospective observational study.","authors":"Antonio Tundo,&nbsp;Loretta Salvati,&nbsp;Luca Cieri,&nbsp;Viviana Balestrini,&nbsp;Daniela Di Spigno,&nbsp;Floriana Orazi,&nbsp;Marica Iommi,&nbsp;Roberta Necci","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2022.2054351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Six in ten patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to the first-line treatments with serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) or cognitive behavioural therapy including exposure and response prevention (CBT/ERP), and several do not respond to second-line treatments, i.e., SRI-second generation antipsychotic (SGA) or SRI-CBT/ERP augmentation. Evidence on third-line treatments is inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the 1-year response to SRI-CBT/ERP-SGA combination in patients with severe treatment-resistant OCD, who failed to respond to SRI and to SRI-SGA or SRI-CBT/ERP augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were consecutively recruited and treated with SRI (drug(s) and doses previously administered), SGA (risperidone median dosage 1 mg/day in 14 cases, aripiprazole median dosage 3 mg/day in 14 cases) and CBT/ERP (median hours 32.5). Exclusion criteria: mental retardation and organic brain syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Y-BOCS total score reduction at 12 months was 28.2%, 60.7% of patients improved, 46.4% partially responded, 32.1% responded, and 28.6% remitted. Patients previously resistant to SRI-SGA and SRI-CBT/ERP did not significantly differ in the rates of improvement, partial response, response and remission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP combination could be useful for severe treatment-resistant OCD. Small sample size is a limitation.Key pointsUp to 6 in 10 patients with OCD do not respond to first line treatments (CBT/ERP or SRIs) and several to second-line treatments (SRI-SGA or SRI CBT/ERP augmentation).In our study, patients with OCD resistant to the first and the second line treatment improved (61%), partially responded (46%), responded (32%), or remitted (29%) combining SRI, SGA and CBT/ERP.In our patients the SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP augmentation improved working/school, social and family impairment.SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP augmentation is easier to use than other treatments for severe treatment-resistant OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2022.2054351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Six in ten patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to the first-line treatments with serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) or cognitive behavioural therapy including exposure and response prevention (CBT/ERP), and several do not respond to second-line treatments, i.e., SRI-second generation antipsychotic (SGA) or SRI-CBT/ERP augmentation. Evidence on third-line treatments is inconsistent.

Objective: We investigated the 1-year response to SRI-CBT/ERP-SGA combination in patients with severe treatment-resistant OCD, who failed to respond to SRI and to SRI-SGA or SRI-CBT/ERP augmentation.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients were consecutively recruited and treated with SRI (drug(s) and doses previously administered), SGA (risperidone median dosage 1 mg/day in 14 cases, aripiprazole median dosage 3 mg/day in 14 cases) and CBT/ERP (median hours 32.5). Exclusion criteria: mental retardation and organic brain syndrome.

Results: The mean Y-BOCS total score reduction at 12 months was 28.2%, 60.7% of patients improved, 46.4% partially responded, 32.1% responded, and 28.6% remitted. Patients previously resistant to SRI-SGA and SRI-CBT/ERP did not significantly differ in the rates of improvement, partial response, response and remission.

Conclusions: This study suggests that SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP combination could be useful for severe treatment-resistant OCD. Small sample size is a limitation.Key pointsUp to 6 in 10 patients with OCD do not respond to first line treatments (CBT/ERP or SRIs) and several to second-line treatments (SRI-SGA or SRI CBT/ERP augmentation).In our study, patients with OCD resistant to the first and the second line treatment improved (61%), partially responded (46%), responded (32%), or remitted (29%) combining SRI, SGA and CBT/ERP.In our patients the SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP augmentation improved working/school, social and family impairment.SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP augmentation is easier to use than other treatments for severe treatment-resistant OCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂-认知行为疗法-第二代抗精神病药物组合治疗严重难治性强迫症。一项前瞻性观察研究。
十分之六的强迫症(OCD)患者对血清素再摄取抑制剂(SRI)或包括暴露和反应预防(CBT/ERP)在内的认知行为疗法的一线治疗无效,一些患者对二线治疗无效,即SRI-第二代抗精神病药(SGA)或SRI-CBT/ERP增强。关于三线治疗的证据并不一致。目的:研究重度难治性强迫症患者对SRI、SRI- sga或SRI- cbt /ERP增强治疗无效的1年治疗反应。方法:连续招募28例患者,采用SRI(药物和剂量)、SGA(利培酮中位剂量1 mg/d 14例,阿立哌唑中位剂量3 mg/d 14例)和CBT/ERP(中位小时32.5)治疗。排除标准:智力低下和器质性脑综合征。结果:12个月时Y-BOCS总评分平均下降28.2%,60.7%的患者改善,46.4%的患者部分缓解,32.1%的患者缓解,28.6%的患者缓解。先前对SRI-SGA和SRI-CBT/ERP耐药的患者在改善率、部分缓解率、缓解率和缓解率方面没有显着差异。结论:本研究提示sri - sgi - cbt /ERP联合治疗可能对重度难治性强迫症有用。样本量小是一个限制。10名强迫症患者中有多达6名对一线治疗(CBT/ERP或SRIs)无效,几名对二线治疗(SRI- sga或SRI CBT/ERP增强)无效。在我们的研究中,对一线和二线治疗有抵抗的强迫症患者改善(61%),部分缓解(46%),缓解(32%)或缓解(29%)联合SRI, SGA和CBT/ERP。在我们的患者中,SRI-SGA-CBT/ERP增强改善了工作/学校、社会和家庭障碍。sri - saga - cbt /ERP增强比其他治疗方法更容易用于治疗严重的难治性强迫症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
期刊最新文献
Mirtazapine blood levels and antidepressant response. Exploring real-world prescribing patterns for maintenance treatment in bipolar disorders: a focus on antidepressants and benzodiazepines. Real-world demographic and clinical profiles of patients with treatment-resistant depression initiated on esketamine nasal spray. Real-world outcomes of long-term use of silexan in patients with anxiety disorders: a single-centre experience. Neurobiological and psychological factors to depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1