Implementation level of best practice policies by Italian Government for healthier food environments: Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4415/ANN_22_01_08
Drieda Zaçe, Andrea Di Pilla, Marco Silano, Elettra Carini, Pasquale Cacciatore, Emanuela Maria Frisicale, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Franco Sassi, Maria Lucia Specchia
{"title":"Implementation level of best practice policies by Italian Government for healthier food environments: Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).","authors":"Drieda Zaçe,&nbsp;Andrea Di Pilla,&nbsp;Marco Silano,&nbsp;Elettra Carini,&nbsp;Pasquale Cacciatore,&nbsp;Emanuela Maria Frisicale,&nbsp;Stefanie Vandevijvere,&nbsp;Franco Sassi,&nbsp;Maria Lucia Specchia","doi":"10.4415/ANN_22_01_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This work aims to identify policies implemented for healthy food environments in Italy within The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Food-EPI tool, which includes two components, thirteen domains and fifty good practice indicators, was adapted for the Italian context. Evidence for implementation was gathered and summarized for all fifty indicators from data sources such as governmental websites, non-government organizations publications and websites and via direct contact with Government officials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest level of evidence was found within five domains: food composition (2/2 indicators), labelling (3/4), promotion (4/5), provision (4/5) and leadership (5/5). The domains with less identified evidence were food prices (1/4), food in retail (0/4), trade and investment (0/2) and platforms and interaction (1/4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence summarization and the upcoming stakeholders' meeting to rate the level of implementation for each indicator in Italy have the potential to improve Government commitment to shape healthier food environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"58 1","pages":"55-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_22_01_08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This work aims to identify policies implemented for healthy food environments in Italy within The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) project.

Methods: Food-EPI tool, which includes two components, thirteen domains and fifty good practice indicators, was adapted for the Italian context. Evidence for implementation was gathered and summarized for all fifty indicators from data sources such as governmental websites, non-government organizations publications and websites and via direct contact with Government officials.

Results: The highest level of evidence was found within five domains: food composition (2/2 indicators), labelling (3/4), promotion (4/5), provision (4/5) and leadership (5/5). The domains with less identified evidence were food prices (1/4), food in retail (0/4), trade and investment (0/2) and platforms and interaction (1/4).

Conclusions: The evidence summarization and the upcoming stakeholders' meeting to rate the level of implementation for each indicator in Italy have the potential to improve Government commitment to shape healthier food environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利政府健康食品环境最佳做法政策的执行水平:健康食品环境政策指数(food - epi)。
背景:本工作旨在确定在健康食品环境政策指数(food - epi)项目中为意大利健康食品环境实施的政策。方法:食品- epi工具,其中包括两个组成部分,13个领域和50个良好做法指标,适用于意大利的情况。从政府网站、非政府组织出版物和网站等数据来源以及通过与政府官员的直接接触收集和总结了所有50个指标的执行证据。结果:证据水平最高的五个领域是:食品成分(2/2)、标签(3/4)、促销(4/5)、供应(4/5)和领导(5/5)。证据较少的领域是食品价格(1/4)、食品零售(0/4)、贸易和投资(0/2)以及平台和互动(1/4)。结论:证据总结和即将召开的对意大利各指标执行情况进行评级的利益攸关方会议有可能改善政府对塑造更健康食品环境的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews. The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office. The journal is in English.
期刊最新文献
Between social and healthcare: a necessary synergy. Editorial. Diagnostic assessment, therapeutic care and education pathways in persons with autism spectrum disorder in transition from childhood to adulthood: the Italian National Ev.A Longitudinal Project. Do demographic and socio-economic factors predict Sense of Coherence among university students? Effectiveness of different local actions to control vitamin D prescription in Italy. The rare malformation holoprosencephaly: pathogenesis, association with pregestational diabetes and the possible link with food pollutants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1