Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Training With Music Therapy Interventions for Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Quasi-Experimental Nonequivalent Control-Group Pilot Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Music Therapy Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1093/jmt/thac005
Abbey Dvorak, Lindsey Landeck, William Dyer, Deborah Spiegel
{"title":"Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Training With Music Therapy Interventions for Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Quasi-Experimental Nonequivalent Control-Group Pilot Study.","authors":"Abbey Dvorak,&nbsp;Lindsey Landeck,&nbsp;William Dyer,&nbsp;Deborah Spiegel","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thac005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) improves emotion regulation by building skills in mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare a DBT skills group with a combined DBT skills and music therapy (MT) group on participant outcomes of attendance, participation, skill practice, and skill knowledge, as well as determine feasibility of study procedures. We used a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control-group design with all groups co-led by a psychologist and a music therapist. Clinicians facilitated twice weekly 45-min groups in 12-week cycles for a total of eight groups over 2 years. The groups alternated DBT-only and DBT+MT; participant data were analyzed for their first cycle attended. The DBT-only group followed a standard DBT skills training format, whereas the DBT+MT group included music therapy interventions as group exercises. Participants (N = 26) were adults with serious mental illness referred to the inpatient psychosocial rehabilitation group (PSR) at a state psychiatric hospital. Participants completed a demographic form, diary cards, and exit interview; clinicians recorded attendance and session participation. Participants in the DBT+MT condition had significantly higher participation levels, slightly higher average attendance, submitted more diary cards, and included more feeling statements than the DBT-only condition. Although interpretations should be approached with caution, the pilot study intervention shows promise. Overall, this study could be implemented as intended under close monitoring, with minor modifications to assist with recruitment and data collection. Modifications, clinical implications, and recommendations for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thac005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) improves emotion regulation by building skills in mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare a DBT skills group with a combined DBT skills and music therapy (MT) group on participant outcomes of attendance, participation, skill practice, and skill knowledge, as well as determine feasibility of study procedures. We used a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control-group design with all groups co-led by a psychologist and a music therapist. Clinicians facilitated twice weekly 45-min groups in 12-week cycles for a total of eight groups over 2 years. The groups alternated DBT-only and DBT+MT; participant data were analyzed for their first cycle attended. The DBT-only group followed a standard DBT skills training format, whereas the DBT+MT group included music therapy interventions as group exercises. Participants (N = 26) were adults with serious mental illness referred to the inpatient psychosocial rehabilitation group (PSR) at a state psychiatric hospital. Participants completed a demographic form, diary cards, and exit interview; clinicians recorded attendance and session participation. Participants in the DBT+MT condition had significantly higher participation levels, slightly higher average attendance, submitted more diary cards, and included more feeling statements than the DBT-only condition. Although interpretations should be approached with caution, the pilot study intervention shows promise. Overall, this study could be implemented as intended under close monitoring, with minor modifications to assist with recruitment and data collection. Modifications, clinical implications, and recommendations for future research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用音乐治疗干预进行成人严重精神疾病患者辩证行为治疗技能训练:一项准实验非等效对照组先导研究。
辩证行为疗法(DBT)通过培养正念、痛苦容忍、情绪调节和人际关系有效性等技能来改善情绪调节。本初步研究的目的是比较DBT技能组与DBT技能和音乐治疗(MT)组合组在参与者出勤、参与、技能练习和技能知识方面的结果,并确定研究程序的可行性。我们采用了准实验的非等效对照组设计,所有小组由一位心理学家和一位音乐治疗师共同领导。临床医生在12周的周期内每周进行两次45分钟的治疗,总共8组,为期2年。两组分别为单组和双组;对参与者第一个周期的数据进行分析。单独的DBT组遵循标准的DBT技能训练格式,而DBT+MT组包括音乐治疗干预作为小组练习。参与者(N = 26)是在州立精神病院的住院心理社会康复组(PSR)就诊的患有严重精神疾病的成年人。参与者完成了人口统计表格、日记卡和离职面谈;临床医生记录出席率和会议参与情况。在DBT+MT条件下,参与者的参与水平显著高于单独DBT条件,平均出勤率略高,提交了更多的日记卡,包括更多的感觉陈述。虽然解释应该谨慎对待,但初步研究干预显示出希望。总的来说,这项研究可以在密切监测下按预期执行,稍加修改以协助征聘和数据收集。讨论了修改、临床意义和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Developing Music Therapy in Maternity Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Scoping Review of Music Interventions Aimed at Improving Reading Skills in Children with Specific Learning Disorders in Reading. Telehealth Engaged Music for Pain Outcomes: A Music and Imagery Proof-of-concept Study with Veterans. Professional Development and Learning Through the Research Process. Music Therapists´ Job Satisfaction and Related Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Five European Countries and Israel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1