Zachary L. Chaplow, Brian C. Focht, Alexander R. Lucas, Elizabeth Grainger, Christina Simpson, Jackie Buell, Ciaran M. Fairman, Jennifer M. Thomas-Ahner, Jessica Bowman, Victoria R. DeScenza, J. Paul Monk, Amir Mortazavi, Steven K. Clinton
{"title":"Effects of a lifestyle intervention on body composition in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy","authors":"Zachary L. Chaplow, Brian C. Focht, Alexander R. Lucas, Elizabeth Grainger, Christina Simpson, Jackie Buell, Ciaran M. Fairman, Jennifer M. Thomas-Ahner, Jessica Bowman, Victoria R. DeScenza, J. Paul Monk, Amir Mortazavi, Steven K. Clinton","doi":"10.1002/crt2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exercise and dietary (EX+D) interventions could represent an optimal treatment for attenuating or reversing adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The Individualized Diet and Exercise Adherence-Pilot (IDEA-P) trial compared the effects of an EX+D intervention relative to standard-of-care (SC) treatment among PCa patients undergoing ADT. The present study evaluated the effects of the EX+D intervention on body composition (BC) obtained via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a subsample of IDEA-P patients. A secondary objective was to explore the association of adiposity and lean mass with mobility performance and strength.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Complete DXA data were acquired from a subsample of 22 PCa patients (EX+D: <i>n</i> = 13; SC: <i>n</i> = 9) at baseline and 3 month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis included data from 30 participants (<i>M</i> age = 66.28; SD = 7.79) with baseline DXA assessments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Intention-to-treat analysis revealed EX+D resulted in significant improvements in fat mass (<i>P</i> = 0.022), per cent fat mass (<i>P</i> = 0.028), trunk fat mass (<i>P</i> = 0.017), fat mass/lean mass (<i>P</i> = 0.040), and per cent lean mass (<i>P</i> = 0.026) vs. SC. EX+D also resulted in more favourable changes in appendicular lean mass/body mass (<i>d</i> = 0.59). Select BC outcomes were also significantly correlated with mobility performance and strength (<i>P</i> < 0.05) at 3 month follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest the EX+D intervention resulted in superior preservation of lean tissue and improvement in adiposity relative to SC treatment. Results underscore the utility of implementing EX+D interventions for preserving muscle mass and reducing adiposity in PCa patients undergoing ADT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9432850/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crt2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background
Exercise and dietary (EX+D) interventions could represent an optimal treatment for attenuating or reversing adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The Individualized Diet and Exercise Adherence-Pilot (IDEA-P) trial compared the effects of an EX+D intervention relative to standard-of-care (SC) treatment among PCa patients undergoing ADT. The present study evaluated the effects of the EX+D intervention on body composition (BC) obtained via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a subsample of IDEA-P patients. A secondary objective was to explore the association of adiposity and lean mass with mobility performance and strength.
Methods
Complete DXA data were acquired from a subsample of 22 PCa patients (EX+D: n = 13; SC: n = 9) at baseline and 3 month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis included data from 30 participants (M age = 66.28; SD = 7.79) with baseline DXA assessments.
Results
Intention-to-treat analysis revealed EX+D resulted in significant improvements in fat mass (P = 0.022), per cent fat mass (P = 0.028), trunk fat mass (P = 0.017), fat mass/lean mass (P = 0.040), and per cent lean mass (P = 0.026) vs. SC. EX+D also resulted in more favourable changes in appendicular lean mass/body mass (d = 0.59). Select BC outcomes were also significantly correlated with mobility performance and strength (P < 0.05) at 3 month follow-up.
Conclusions
Findings suggest the EX+D intervention resulted in superior preservation of lean tissue and improvement in adiposity relative to SC treatment. Results underscore the utility of implementing EX+D interventions for preserving muscle mass and reducing adiposity in PCa patients undergoing ADT.