A Long-term Clinical Study to Evaluate AGV with Concurrent Intravitreal Ranibizumab vs Primary AGV Implantation in Cases of Refractory Neovascular Glaucoma.

Jaya Kaushik, Jitendra Ks Parihar, Rakesh Shetty, Ankita Singh, Piyush Chaturvedi
{"title":"A Long-term Clinical Study to Evaluate AGV with Concurrent Intravitreal Ranibizumab vs Primary AGV Implantation in Cases of Refractory Neovascular Glaucoma.","authors":"Jaya Kaushik,&nbsp;Jitendra Ks Parihar,&nbsp;Rakesh Shetty,&nbsp;Ankita Singh,&nbsp;Piyush Chaturvedi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to gauge the efficacy of primary AGV implantation with concurrent intraoperative intravitreal ranibizumab vs primary AGV implantation alone in the management of neovascular glaucoma (NVG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study was carried out based on the data collected in patients of neovascular glaucoma who underwent Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation with or without concurrent intravitreal ranibizumab between the period from Feb 2009 to Feb 2015 involving two groups of 40 patients each, having the clinical diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma, having undergone pan-retinal photocoagulation with minimum 03 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab not less than 4 weeks prior to undergoing primary Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and allotted randomly to either group to receive concurrent administration of intravitreal ranibizumab with Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implant surgery or AGV implant surgery alone. The minimum qualifying follow-up was 3-years. The functional outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative complications, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the need for antiglaucoma medication, if any, as well as best corrected visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups showed a significant decrease in IOP (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Sight and IOP threatening postoperative complications were significantly low in the study group. NVI regression was higher in the study group and re-emergence was significantly lesser in the study group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Mean postop IOP had shown an excellent reduction in IOP up to 14.25 ± 2.05 mm Hg with 1.5 ± 1 antiglaucoma drugs in ranibizumab group and 15.25 ± 2.95 mm Hg with 1.7 ± 0.87 antiglaucoma drugs in the control group at the 3-years follow-up period. Surgical success rates were comparable between the two groups at 1 and 3-year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent intravitreal ranibizumab along with primary AGV implantation minimizes postoperative complications, regresses NVI while accelerating stabilization of IOP and visual functions.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kaushik J, Parihar JKS, Shetty R, <i>et al.</i> A Long-term Clinical Study to Evaluate AGV with Concurrent Intravitreal Ranibizumab vs Primary AGV Implantation in Cases of Refractory Neovascular Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):41-46.</p>","PeriodicalId":15419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/6e/jocgp-16-41.PMC9385393.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to gauge the efficacy of primary AGV implantation with concurrent intraoperative intravitreal ranibizumab vs primary AGV implantation alone in the management of neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods: This retrospective comparative study was carried out based on the data collected in patients of neovascular glaucoma who underwent Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation with or without concurrent intravitreal ranibizumab between the period from Feb 2009 to Feb 2015 involving two groups of 40 patients each, having the clinical diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma, having undergone pan-retinal photocoagulation with minimum 03 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab not less than 4 weeks prior to undergoing primary Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and allotted randomly to either group to receive concurrent administration of intravitreal ranibizumab with Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implant surgery or AGV implant surgery alone. The minimum qualifying follow-up was 3-years. The functional outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative complications, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the need for antiglaucoma medication, if any, as well as best corrected visual acuity.

Results: Both the groups showed a significant decrease in IOP (p < 0.05). Sight and IOP threatening postoperative complications were significantly low in the study group. NVI regression was higher in the study group and re-emergence was significantly lesser in the study group (p = 0.002). Mean postop IOP had shown an excellent reduction in IOP up to 14.25 ± 2.05 mm Hg with 1.5 ± 1 antiglaucoma drugs in ranibizumab group and 15.25 ± 2.95 mm Hg with 1.7 ± 0.87 antiglaucoma drugs in the control group at the 3-years follow-up period. Surgical success rates were comparable between the two groups at 1 and 3-year.

Conclusion: Concurrent intravitreal ranibizumab along with primary AGV implantation minimizes postoperative complications, regresses NVI while accelerating stabilization of IOP and visual functions.

How to cite this article: Kaushik J, Parihar JKS, Shetty R, et al. A Long-term Clinical Study to Evaluate AGV with Concurrent Intravitreal Ranibizumab vs Primary AGV Implantation in Cases of Refractory Neovascular Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):41-46.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估AGV同时玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗与原发性AGV植入治疗难治性新生血管性青光眼的长期临床研究
目的:本研究旨在评估术中同步玻璃体内雷尼单抗的原发性AGV植入与单独原发性AGV植入治疗新生血管性青光眼(NVG)的疗效。方法:本回顾性比较研究是基于2009年2月至2015年2月期间收集的新血管性青光眼患者艾哈迈德青光眼瓣膜植入联合或不联合玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗的数据,涉及两组患者,每组40例,临床诊断为新血管性青光眼。在接受原发性艾哈迈德青光眼瓣膜植入术前不少于4周,接受了至少03次玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗的全视网膜光凝治疗,并随机分配到两组,接受雷尼单抗玻璃体内联合艾哈迈德青光眼瓣膜(AGV)植入术或单独AGV植入术。符合条件的最低随访时间为3年。功能结果测量包括术中和术后并发症、眼压(IOP)、抗青光眼药物的需要(如果有的话)以及最佳矫正视力。结果:两组患者IOP均显著降低(p < 0.05)。研究组的视力和眼压威胁术后并发症明显较低。研究组的NVI回归较高,研究组的再出现率明显较低(p = 0.002)。在3年的随访中,雷尼单抗组使用1.5±1种抗青光眼药物后,IOP平均降低14.25±2.05 mm Hg,对照组使用1.7±0.87种抗青光眼药物后,IOP平均降低15.25±2.95 mm Hg。两组在1年和3年的手术成功率相当。结论:玻璃体内同时植入雷尼单抗和AGV可最大限度地减少术后并发症,在加速IOP和视觉功能稳定的同时缓解NVI。如何引用本文:Kaushik J, Parihar JKS, Shetty R,等。一项评估AGV同时玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗与原发性AGV植入治疗难治性新生血管性青光眼的长期临床研究中华青光眼杂志;2010;16(1):41-46。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Review of Canaloplasty in the Treatment and Management of Glaucoma Effect of Sleeping Position on the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Individuals with Glaucoma The Metabolic Shift: Unraveling the Potential of the Ketogenic Diet in Glaucoma Management Bilateral Chandler Syndrome, Nanophthalmos, and Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Complex Presentation, Challenging Diagnosis, and Pathological Insight—A Case Report Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Spacer for Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1