Toolbox Talks: Insights for Improvement.

Professional safety Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Vicki Kaskutas, Lisa Jaegers, Ann Marie Dale, Bradley A Evanoff
{"title":"Toolbox Talks: Insights for Improvement.","authors":"Vicki Kaskutas,&nbsp;Lisa Jaegers,&nbsp;Ann Marie Dale,&nbsp;Bradley A Evanoff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tool box talks (TBTs) have the potential to improve communication, empower workers, reduce injuries and improve safety; however, they can also be \"missed opportunities\" for providing important safety messages in construction. The goal of this paper is to share the results from two research projects designed to improve the frequency, delivery, participation, and outcomes of TBTs. The results of these projects provide suggestions for planning and delivering TBTs in construction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first project, 86 residential carpentry foremen from 8 different residential contractors in the St. Louis region participated in training for delivering TBTs as part of an 8-hour fall prevention and safety communication intervention. We compared baseline measures of safety behavior and fall prevention knowledge items to follow-up between participating foremen and their crewmembers. Concurrently, surveys of 300 apprentice carpenters were collected to describe the frequency and delivery methods of TBT and to serve as a comparison group for the TBT intervention. In the second project, we evaluated the utility of ergonomics TBTs delivered by a safety representative to 36 carpenters and laborers. Workers rated their perceptions of topic relevance, delivery method, similarities to traditional TBTs, and intent to change behaviors. The safety representative provided feedback regarding the TBTs and reported their observations of improved worker use of ergonomics in work tasks post-training.</p><p><strong>Discussion / conclusions: </strong>Both interventions described in this paper improved workplace safety. The interventions demonstrate how to simply shift from non-collaborative TBTs to participatory, context-driven TBTs by using a pre-printed TBT template, modified to address the hazards present at the worksite. Delivery suggestions relate the information to the workers, and include workers in the identification of problems and safety-related solutions. These participatory methods for preparing and delivering TBTs have the potential to improve construction workplace safety practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":74579,"journal":{"name":"Professional safety","volume":"None ","pages":"33-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434703/pdf/nihms-1800244.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tool box talks (TBTs) have the potential to improve communication, empower workers, reduce injuries and improve safety; however, they can also be "missed opportunities" for providing important safety messages in construction. The goal of this paper is to share the results from two research projects designed to improve the frequency, delivery, participation, and outcomes of TBTs. The results of these projects provide suggestions for planning and delivering TBTs in construction.

Methods: In the first project, 86 residential carpentry foremen from 8 different residential contractors in the St. Louis region participated in training for delivering TBTs as part of an 8-hour fall prevention and safety communication intervention. We compared baseline measures of safety behavior and fall prevention knowledge items to follow-up between participating foremen and their crewmembers. Concurrently, surveys of 300 apprentice carpenters were collected to describe the frequency and delivery methods of TBT and to serve as a comparison group for the TBT intervention. In the second project, we evaluated the utility of ergonomics TBTs delivered by a safety representative to 36 carpenters and laborers. Workers rated their perceptions of topic relevance, delivery method, similarities to traditional TBTs, and intent to change behaviors. The safety representative provided feedback regarding the TBTs and reported their observations of improved worker use of ergonomics in work tasks post-training.

Discussion / conclusions: Both interventions described in this paper improved workplace safety. The interventions demonstrate how to simply shift from non-collaborative TBTs to participatory, context-driven TBTs by using a pre-printed TBT template, modified to address the hazards present at the worksite. Delivery suggestions relate the information to the workers, and include workers in the identification of problems and safety-related solutions. These participatory methods for preparing and delivering TBTs have the potential to improve construction workplace safety practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工具箱讲座:改进的见解。
工具箱谈话(tbt)有可能改善沟通,赋予工人权力,减少伤害和改善安全;然而,它们也可能“错失”在施工中提供重要安全信息的机会。本文的目的是分享两个研究项目的结果,这些研究项目旨在改善tbt的频率、交付、参与和结果。这些项目的结果为tbt在建设中的规划和交付提供了建议。方法:在第一个项目中,来自圣路易斯地区8家不同住宅承包商的86名住宅木工工头参加了提供tbt的培训,这是8小时预防跌倒和安全沟通干预的一部分。我们比较了安全行为的基线测量和预防跌倒的知识项目与参与的工头和他们的船员之间的随访。同时,收集300名学徒木匠的调查,描述TBT的频率和传递方式,并作为TBT干预的对照组。在第二个项目中,我们评估了由安全代表向36名木匠和工人交付的人体工程学tbt的效用。员工对话题相关性、传递方式、与传统tbt的相似之处以及改变行为的意图进行了评分。安全代表提供了关于tbt的反馈,并报告了他们在培训后的工作任务中提高工人使用人体工程学的观察结果。讨论/结论:本文中描述的两种干预措施都改善了工作场所的安全。这些干预措施展示了如何通过使用预先打印的TBT模板,简单地从非协作性TBT转变为参与性的、环境驱动的TBT,修改以解决工作现场存在的危害。交付建议将信息与工人联系起来,并包括工人识别问题和安全相关解决方案。这些用于准备和提供tbt的参与性方法有可能改善建筑工作场所的安全实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EXPLORING PERCEPTIONS of U.S. Healthcare & Public Safety Workers at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. SAFETY CLIMATE: The Derived Importance of Personal vs. Situational Factors in Mining. Forklift Safety - Pilot Study Evaluation of Retrofit Lights. SAW SAFETY Risk in the Real World. Job Autonomy & Safety Climate: Examining Associations in the Mining Industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1