Do You Use Love to Make it Lovely? The Role of Meaning Overlap across Morphological Relatives in the Development of Morphological Representations.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1017/S0305000922000356
Pauline Quemart, Julie A Wolter, Xi Chen, S Hélène Deacon
{"title":"Do You Use Love to Make it Lovely? The Role of Meaning Overlap across Morphological Relatives in the Development of Morphological Representations.","authors":"Pauline Quemart,&nbsp;Julie A Wolter,&nbsp;Xi Chen,&nbsp;S Hélène Deacon","doi":"10.1017/S0305000922000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined whether and how the degree of meaning overlap between morphologically related words influences sentence plausibility judgment in children. In two separate studies with kindergarten and second-graders, English-speaking and French-speaking children judged the plausibility of sentences that included two paired target words. Some of these word pairs were morphologically related, across three conditions with differing levels of meaning overlap: low (<i>wait-waiter</i>), moderate (<i>fold</i>-<i>folder</i>) and high (<i>farm</i>-<i>farmer</i>). In another two conditions, word pairs were related only by phonology (<i>rock-rocket</i>) or semantics (<i>car</i>-<i>automobile</i>). Children in both ages and languages demonstrated higher plausibility scores as meaning overlap increased between morphologically related words. Further, kindergarten children rated sentences that included word pairs with phonological overlap as more plausible than second-grade children, while second-grade children rated those with high meaning overlap as more plausible than kindergarten children. We interpret these findings in light of current models of morphological development.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1487-1507"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000356","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined whether and how the degree of meaning overlap between morphologically related words influences sentence plausibility judgment in children. In two separate studies with kindergarten and second-graders, English-speaking and French-speaking children judged the plausibility of sentences that included two paired target words. Some of these word pairs were morphologically related, across three conditions with differing levels of meaning overlap: low (wait-waiter), moderate (fold-folder) and high (farm-farmer). In another two conditions, word pairs were related only by phonology (rock-rocket) or semantics (car-automobile). Children in both ages and languages demonstrated higher plausibility scores as meaning overlap increased between morphologically related words. Further, kindergarten children rated sentences that included word pairs with phonological overlap as more plausible than second-grade children, while second-grade children rated those with high meaning overlap as more plausible than kindergarten children. We interpret these findings in light of current models of morphological development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你用爱让它变得可爱吗?意义在形态关系中的重叠在形态表征发展中的作用。
我们研究了形态相关词之间的意义重叠程度是否以及如何影响儿童的句子合理性判断。在两项分别针对幼儿园和二年级学生的研究中,说英语和说法语的孩子判断了包含两个配对目标词的句子的合理性。这些单词对中的一些在形态上是相关的,涉及三种不同意义重叠程度的条件:低(等待服务员)、中等(折叠文件夹)和高(农场农民)。在另外两种情况下,单词对仅通过音韵学(rock rocket)或语义(car automobile)相关。随着形态相关单词之间含义重叠的增加,不同年龄和语言的儿童都表现出更高的可信度分数。此外,幼儿园儿童认为包含语音重叠的单词对的句子比二年级儿童更可信,而二年级儿童则认为具有高意义重叠的句子比幼儿园儿童更可信。我们根据目前的形态学发展模型来解释这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Mapping and Rewiring Biology via Proximity Induction Synthesis, Structure, and Function of Heparan Sulfate Glycopolymers to Investigate Glycosaminoglycan-Protein Interactions. Designing Fullerene-Based Nanomedicines for Treating Inflammatory Diseases: From Molecular Mechanism to Clinical Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1