Sex Disparity in Characteristics, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: Insights from Henan STEMI Registry.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2835485
Shan Wang, You Zhang, Qianqian Cheng, Datun Qi, Xianpei Wang, Zhongyu Zhu, Muwei Li, Junhui Zhang, Dayi Hu, Chuanyu Gao, On Behalf Of Henan Stemi Registry Study Group
{"title":"Sex Disparity in Characteristics, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: Insights from Henan STEMI Registry.","authors":"Shan Wang, You Zhang, Qianqian Cheng, Datun Qi, Xianpei Wang, Zhongyu Zhu, Muwei Li, Junhui Zhang, Dayi Hu, Chuanyu Gao, On Behalf Of Henan Stemi Registry Study Group","doi":"10.1155/2022/2835485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience higher risk of early mortality than men. We aimed to investigate the potential impact of risk factors, clinical characteristics, and management among gender-related risk differences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed 5063 STEMI patients prospectively enrolled from 66 hospitals during 2016-2018 and compared sex differences in mortality, death, or treatment withdrawal and main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) using the generalized linear mixed model, following sequential adjustment for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (53.3% vs. 41.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and diabetes (24.5% vs. 15.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Eligible women were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy (56.1% vs. 62.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001); the onset to first medical contact (FMC) (255 vs. 190 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001), onset to fibrinolysis (218 vs. 185 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and onset to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (307 vs. 243 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were significantly delayed in women. The incidence of in-hospital death (6.8% vs. 3.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), death or treatment withdrawal (14.5% vs. 5.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and MACCE (18.5% vs. 9.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were notably higher. The gender disparities persist in death (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.33), death or treatment withdrawal (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.24), and MACCE (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.74) after adjustment for covariates. Among possible explanatory factors, age (-58.46%, -59.04%, -62.20%) and cardiovascular risk factors (-40.77%, -39.36%, -41.73%) accounted for most of the gender-associated risk differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women experienced worse in-hospital outcomes, and age and cardiovascular risk factors were major factors influencing sex-related differences. The sex disparity stressed the awareness and importance of quality improvement efforts against female patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2835485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience higher risk of early mortality than men. We aimed to investigate the potential impact of risk factors, clinical characteristics, and management among gender-related risk differences.

Method: We analyzed 5063 STEMI patients prospectively enrolled from 66 hospitals during 2016-2018 and compared sex differences in mortality, death, or treatment withdrawal and main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) using the generalized linear mixed model, following sequential adjustment for covariates.

Results: Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (53.3% vs. 41.1%, P < 0.001) and diabetes (24.5% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001). Eligible women were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy (56.1% vs. 62.4%, P < 0.001); the onset to first medical contact (FMC) (255 vs. 190 minutes, P < 0.001), onset to fibrinolysis (218 vs. 185 minutes, P < 0.001), and onset to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (307 vs. 243 minutes, P < 0.001) were significantly delayed in women. The incidence of in-hospital death (6.8% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001), death or treatment withdrawal (14.5% vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001), and MACCE (18.5% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001) were notably higher. The gender disparities persist in death (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.33), death or treatment withdrawal (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.24), and MACCE (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.74) after adjustment for covariates. Among possible explanatory factors, age (-58.46%, -59.04%, -62.20%) and cardiovascular risk factors (-40.77%, -39.36%, -41.73%) accounted for most of the gender-associated risk differences.

Conclusions: Women experienced worse in-hospital outcomes, and age and cardiovascular risk factors were major factors influencing sex-related differences. The sex disparity stressed the awareness and importance of quality improvement efforts against female patients in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者特征、管理和院内预后的性别差异:河南 STEMI 登记的启示。
背景:女性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的早期死亡风险高于男性。我们旨在研究风险因素、临床特征和管理对性别相关风险差异的潜在影响:我们分析了 2016-2018 年间从 66 家医院前瞻性入组的 5063 名 STEMI 患者,并使用广义线性混合模型比较了死亡率、死亡或停药以及主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的性别差异,之后对协变量进行了序列调整:女性年龄更大,高血压(53.3% 对 41.1%,P<0.001)和糖尿病(24.5% 对 15.2%,P<0.001)患病率更高。符合条件的女性接受再灌注治疗的可能性较低(56.1% 对 62.4%,P<0.001);女性从发病到首次医疗接触(FMC)(255 分钟 对 190 分钟,P<0.001)、从发病到纤维蛋白溶解(218 分钟 对 185 分钟,P<0.001)和从发病到经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(307 分钟 对 243 分钟,P<0.001)的时间明显推迟。院内死亡(6.8% 对 3.0%,P<0.001)、死亡或放弃治疗(14.5% 对 5.6%,P<0.001)和 MACCE(18.5% 对 9.4%,P<0.001)的发生率明显更高。在调整协变量后,死亡(OR:1.61,95% CI:1.12-2.33)、死亡或治疗中止(OR:1.68,95% CI:1.26-2.24)和 MACCE(OR:1.37,95% CI:1.08-1.74)方面的性别差异依然存在。在可能的解释因素中,年龄(-58.46%、-59.04%、-62.20%)和心血管风险因素(-40.77%、-39.36%、-41.73%)占性别相关风险差异的大部分:结论:女性的院内预后较差,年龄和心血管风险因素是影响性别差异的主要因素。性别差异强调了在临床实践中针对女性患者提高质量的意识和重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Cycloergometer on Cardiopulmonary Function in Elderly Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Clinical Trial. Inhibiting H2AX Can Ameliorate Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Regulating P53/JNK Signaling Pathway. Atrial Strain and Strain Rate in a General Population: Do These Measures Improve the Assessment of Elevated NT-proBNP Levels? The Pharmacological Mechanisms Underlying the Protective Effect of Ginsenoside Rg3 against Heart Failure. Beta-Thalassemia Major and Myocardial Iron Overload: A Longitudinal Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1