Sex Disparity in Characteristics, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: Insights from Henan STEMI Registry.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2835485
Shan Wang, You Zhang, Qianqian Cheng, Datun Qi, Xianpei Wang, Zhongyu Zhu, Muwei Li, Junhui Zhang, Dayi Hu, Chuanyu Gao, On Behalf Of Henan Stemi Registry Study Group
{"title":"Sex Disparity in Characteristics, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction: Insights from Henan STEMI Registry.","authors":"Shan Wang, You Zhang, Qianqian Cheng, Datun Qi, Xianpei Wang, Zhongyu Zhu, Muwei Li, Junhui Zhang, Dayi Hu, Chuanyu Gao, On Behalf Of Henan Stemi Registry Study Group","doi":"10.1155/2022/2835485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience higher risk of early mortality than men. We aimed to investigate the potential impact of risk factors, clinical characteristics, and management among gender-related risk differences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed 5063 STEMI patients prospectively enrolled from 66 hospitals during 2016-2018 and compared sex differences in mortality, death, or treatment withdrawal and main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) using the generalized linear mixed model, following sequential adjustment for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (53.3% vs. 41.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and diabetes (24.5% vs. 15.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Eligible women were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy (56.1% vs. 62.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001); the onset to first medical contact (FMC) (255 vs. 190 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001), onset to fibrinolysis (218 vs. 185 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and onset to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (307 vs. 243 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were significantly delayed in women. The incidence of in-hospital death (6.8% vs. 3.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), death or treatment withdrawal (14.5% vs. 5.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and MACCE (18.5% vs. 9.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were notably higher. The gender disparities persist in death (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.33), death or treatment withdrawal (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.24), and MACCE (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.74) after adjustment for covariates. Among possible explanatory factors, age (-58.46%, -59.04%, -62.20%) and cardiovascular risk factors (-40.77%, -39.36%, -41.73%) accounted for most of the gender-associated risk differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women experienced worse in-hospital outcomes, and age and cardiovascular risk factors were major factors influencing sex-related differences. The sex disparity stressed the awareness and importance of quality improvement efforts against female patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"2835485"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2835485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience higher risk of early mortality than men. We aimed to investigate the potential impact of risk factors, clinical characteristics, and management among gender-related risk differences.

Method: We analyzed 5063 STEMI patients prospectively enrolled from 66 hospitals during 2016-2018 and compared sex differences in mortality, death, or treatment withdrawal and main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) using the generalized linear mixed model, following sequential adjustment for covariates.

Results: Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (53.3% vs. 41.1%, P < 0.001) and diabetes (24.5% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001). Eligible women were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy (56.1% vs. 62.4%, P < 0.001); the onset to first medical contact (FMC) (255 vs. 190 minutes, P < 0.001), onset to fibrinolysis (218 vs. 185 minutes, P < 0.001), and onset to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (307 vs. 243 minutes, P < 0.001) were significantly delayed in women. The incidence of in-hospital death (6.8% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001), death or treatment withdrawal (14.5% vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001), and MACCE (18.5% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001) were notably higher. The gender disparities persist in death (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.33), death or treatment withdrawal (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.24), and MACCE (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.74) after adjustment for covariates. Among possible explanatory factors, age (-58.46%, -59.04%, -62.20%) and cardiovascular risk factors (-40.77%, -39.36%, -41.73%) accounted for most of the gender-associated risk differences.

Conclusions: Women experienced worse in-hospital outcomes, and age and cardiovascular risk factors were major factors influencing sex-related differences. The sex disparity stressed the awareness and importance of quality improvement efforts against female patients in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者特征、管理和院内预后的性别差异:河南 STEMI 登记的启示。
背景:女性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的早期死亡风险高于男性。我们旨在研究风险因素、临床特征和管理对性别相关风险差异的潜在影响:我们分析了 2016-2018 年间从 66 家医院前瞻性入组的 5063 名 STEMI 患者,并使用广义线性混合模型比较了死亡率、死亡或停药以及主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的性别差异,之后对协变量进行了序列调整:女性年龄更大,高血压(53.3% 对 41.1%,P<0.001)和糖尿病(24.5% 对 15.2%,P<0.001)患病率更高。符合条件的女性接受再灌注治疗的可能性较低(56.1% 对 62.4%,P<0.001);女性从发病到首次医疗接触(FMC)(255 分钟 对 190 分钟,P<0.001)、从发病到纤维蛋白溶解(218 分钟 对 185 分钟,P<0.001)和从发病到经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(307 分钟 对 243 分钟,P<0.001)的时间明显推迟。院内死亡(6.8% 对 3.0%,P<0.001)、死亡或放弃治疗(14.5% 对 5.6%,P<0.001)和 MACCE(18.5% 对 9.4%,P<0.001)的发生率明显更高。在调整协变量后,死亡(OR:1.61,95% CI:1.12-2.33)、死亡或治疗中止(OR:1.68,95% CI:1.26-2.24)和 MACCE(OR:1.37,95% CI:1.08-1.74)方面的性别差异依然存在。在可能的解释因素中,年龄(-58.46%、-59.04%、-62.20%)和心血管风险因素(-40.77%、-39.36%、-41.73%)占性别相关风险差异的大部分:结论:女性的院内预后较差,年龄和心血管风险因素是影响性别差异的主要因素。性别差异强调了在临床实践中针对女性患者提高质量的意识和重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Photon Management in Photochemical Synthesis and Reactor Scale-Up. Manifestations of Boron-Alkali Metal and Boron-Alkaline-Earth Metal Romances Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Mapping and Rewiring Biology via Proximity Induction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1