Upper and lower limb muscle sympathetic responses to contralateral exercise in healthy humans: A pilot study

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103024
Jordan B. Lee , Keisho Katayama , Philip J. Millar
{"title":"Upper and lower limb muscle sympathetic responses to contralateral exercise in healthy humans: A pilot study","authors":"Jordan B. Lee ,&nbsp;Keisho Katayama ,&nbsp;Philip J. Millar","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is similar between limbs at rest, although a subset of MSNA bursts do demonstrate limb-specific discharge. Whether limb differences in MSNA synchronicity are present during exercise remains controversial. We concurrently measured MSNA from the radial and fibular nerves at rest and during rhythmic handgrip (RHG), static handgrip (SHG), and post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). MSNA burst frequency and incidence were similar between nerve sites during all conditions. Synchronous bursts resulted in larger increases in sympathetic-blood pressure transduction compared to isolated bursts (∆ + 3.6 ± 2.1 vs. +2.3 ± 2.4 mmHg, </span><em>P</em> = 0.01). The proportion of bursts firing synchronously between nerves at rest was slightly increased during RHG ([rest vs. exercise; mean ± SD] 45.3 ± 7.1 vs. 61.6 ± 7.2 %) and similar during SHG (56.2 ± 7.2 vs. 54 ± 10.6 %). In contrast, burst firing synchronicity increased during PECO (83.8 ± 12.4 %) alongside larger burst amplitudes. Inter-limb differences in resting MSNA are preserved during handgrip exercise, whereas isolated metaboreflex activation results in greater burst synchronization between limbs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070222000832","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is similar between limbs at rest, although a subset of MSNA bursts do demonstrate limb-specific discharge. Whether limb differences in MSNA synchronicity are present during exercise remains controversial. We concurrently measured MSNA from the radial and fibular nerves at rest and during rhythmic handgrip (RHG), static handgrip (SHG), and post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). MSNA burst frequency and incidence were similar between nerve sites during all conditions. Synchronous bursts resulted in larger increases in sympathetic-blood pressure transduction compared to isolated bursts (∆ + 3.6 ± 2.1 vs. +2.3 ± 2.4 mmHg, P = 0.01). The proportion of bursts firing synchronously between nerves at rest was slightly increased during RHG ([rest vs. exercise; mean ± SD] 45.3 ± 7.1 vs. 61.6 ± 7.2 %) and similar during SHG (56.2 ± 7.2 vs. 54 ± 10.6 %). In contrast, burst firing synchronicity increased during PECO (83.8 ± 12.4 %) alongside larger burst amplitudes. Inter-limb differences in resting MSNA are preserved during handgrip exercise, whereas isolated metaboreflex activation results in greater burst synchronization between limbs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康人对侧运动的上肢和下肢肌肉交感反应:一项初步研究
肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)在四肢休息时是相似的,尽管MSNA爆发的一个子集确实表现出肢体特异性放电。肢体在运动过程中是否存在MSNA同步性的差异仍然存在争议。我们同时测量了静息、有节奏握力(RHG)、静态握力(SHG)和运动后循环闭塞(PECO)时桡骨和腓骨神经的MSNA。在所有情况下,不同神经部位的MSNA爆发频率和发生率相似。与孤立爆发相比,同步爆发导致交感血压转导增加更大(∆+ 3.6±2.1 vs +2.3±2.4 mmHg, P = 0.01)。在RHG期间,休息时神经间同步放电的比例略有增加(休息vs.运动;均值±SD) 45.3±7.1和61.6±7.2%)和类似宋惠乔期间(56.2±7.2 vs . 54±10.6%)。相比之下,PECO期间爆发发射同步性增加(83.8±12.4%),同时爆发振幅增大。在握力运动中,静息时肢体间的MSNA差异被保留,而孤立的代谢反射激活导致肢体间更大的爆发同步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Intrasubject reproducibility of supine norepinephrine plasma concentrations in patients with cardiovascular sympathetic failure The role of peripheral venous distension reflex in regulating hemodynamics: mini review Carotid body interoception in health and disease Renal interoception in health and disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1