A Policy Review of the SEED (Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration) Project: Is the Devil in the Details?

Umar Ghuman
{"title":"A Policy Review of the SEED (Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration) Project: Is the Devil in the Details?","authors":"Umar Ghuman","doi":"10.1007/s42413-021-00145-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines the <i>Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration</i> (SEED) project, a guaranteed income (GI) project that was undertaken in Stockton, California from 2019- 2021. SEED is a collaborative initiative by the Mayor's Office of Stockton, <i>the Reinvent Stockton Foundation</i> (RSF), and the <i>Economic Security Project</i> (ESF). The purpose of the SEED project was to ascertain the effects of guaranteed income on the well-being of the project recipients, with a focus on the effects of a UBI on participants' financial and psychological health. This review will study the potential benefits and challenges involved in implementing such a project, from political, social and economic perspectives. The review will also examine a UBI project's long- and short-term viability, and its impact on a city, and the project's beneficiaries. The review will aim to provide a balanced understanding of guaranteed income projects, and the means by which they affect recipients as well as other stakeholders, and the possibilities of implementing guaranteed income on a larger scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":73439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of community well-being","volume":" ","pages":"819-830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469043/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of community well-being","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00145-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This review examines the Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration (SEED) project, a guaranteed income (GI) project that was undertaken in Stockton, California from 2019- 2021. SEED is a collaborative initiative by the Mayor's Office of Stockton, the Reinvent Stockton Foundation (RSF), and the Economic Security Project (ESF). The purpose of the SEED project was to ascertain the effects of guaranteed income on the well-being of the project recipients, with a focus on the effects of a UBI on participants' financial and psychological health. This review will study the potential benefits and challenges involved in implementing such a project, from political, social and economic perspectives. The review will also examine a UBI project's long- and short-term viability, and its impact on a city, and the project's beneficiaries. The review will aim to provide a balanced understanding of guaranteed income projects, and the means by which they affect recipients as well as other stakeholders, and the possibilities of implementing guaranteed income on a larger scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对SEED(斯托克顿经济赋权示范)项目的政策审查:细节是魔鬼吗?
本综述考察了斯托克顿经济赋权示范(SEED)项目,这是2019年至2021年在加利福尼亚州斯托克顿开展的一个保证收入(GI)项目。SEED是由斯托克顿市长办公室、重塑斯托克顿基金会(RSF)和经济安全项目(ESF)共同发起的一项合作倡议。SEED项目的目的是确定保障收入对项目接受者福祉的影响,重点关注全民基本收入对参与者财务和心理健康的影响。这项审查将从政治、社会和经济的角度研究执行这一项目所涉及的潜在利益和挑战。审查还将审查全民基本收入项目的长期和短期可行性,及其对城市和项目受益者的影响。审查的目的是平衡地了解保证收入项目及其对受助人和其他利益相关者的影响方式,以及在更大范围内实施保证收入的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Landscape of Gig Workers’ Well-Being: A Bibliometric Analysis Assessment of Worker Satisfaction with Special Emphasis on Gig Economy: A Review for Potential Research Paradigm Do Children Matter in the Quest for Sustainable Development Goals Attainment? Children’s Vulnerability and Water Scarcity in Zimbabwe Ethnic Minority Inclusion in Well-Being Research: Beyond Widening Participation The Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in Community Wellbeing Research: Deliberative Method and the Lens of ‘Pragmatic Complexity’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1