A contemporary snippet on clinical presentation and management of toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2022-09-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20595131221122381
Piyu Parth Naik
{"title":"A contemporary snippet on clinical presentation and management of toxic epidermal necrolysis.","authors":"Piyu Parth Naik","doi":"10.1177/20595131221122381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is one of the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions with a mortality rate of 30%. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the treatment and management of TEN, therapy is individualized on a case-to-case basis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The scientific literature about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and TEN is summarized and assessed to aid and assist in determining the optimal course of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Google Scholar, among others, were searched with the keywords: \"Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis\", \"corticosteroids\", \"cyclosporine\", \"etanercept\", \"intravenous immunoglobulin\", \"Stevens-Johnson syndrome\" and filtered by year. The research articles generated by the search, and their references, were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEN is a severe dermatological condition that is mainly caused by medicines. World-wide guidelines differ in care plans. As there is no consensus on the management of TEN, this article aims to summarize the efficacy and feasibility of the management aspect of TEN from previous studies. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicines (hydration & electrolytes). Corticosteroids and cyclosporine have been used in therapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is currently being administered; however, their efficacy by themselves and in combination remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence predominantly from retrospective studies suggests no individual treatment has sufficient efficacy and a multi-faceted regimen stands to be favored. Therapeutic regimens from corticosteroids to IVIG are under constant evaluation. The life-threatening nature of TEN warrants further confirmation with more extensive, robust randomized, controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a serious skin reaction with a 30% chance of mortality. Commonly TEN is caused by medicines and results in a burn like appearance and sensation in patients. Usually administered medicine is cleared effectively by the human body but when the clearance of few metabolites from medicine is disrupted due to few genes, it leads to an ominous response by the body. This response involves several intermediate chemicals that primarily attack skin cells. Treatment guidelines differ globally. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicine. Currently, a multi-faceted treatment regimen is favored. Treatments like corticosteroids to immunoglobulins are under constant evaluation. Identification of the perfect combination of treatment needs confirmation from robust randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/35/10.1177_20595131221122381.PMC9476246.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131221122381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is one of the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions with a mortality rate of 30%. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the treatment and management of TEN, therapy is individualized on a case-to-case basis.

Purpose: The scientific literature about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and TEN is summarized and assessed to aid and assist in determining the optimal course of treatment.

Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar, among others, were searched with the keywords: "Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis", "corticosteroids", "cyclosporine", "etanercept", "intravenous immunoglobulin", "Stevens-Johnson syndrome" and filtered by year. The research articles generated by the search, and their references, were reviewed.

Results: TEN is a severe dermatological condition that is mainly caused by medicines. World-wide guidelines differ in care plans. As there is no consensus on the management of TEN, this article aims to summarize the efficacy and feasibility of the management aspect of TEN from previous studies. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicines (hydration & electrolytes). Corticosteroids and cyclosporine have been used in therapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is currently being administered; however, their efficacy by themselves and in combination remains uncertain.

Conclusion: Current evidence predominantly from retrospective studies suggests no individual treatment has sufficient efficacy and a multi-faceted regimen stands to be favored. Therapeutic regimens from corticosteroids to IVIG are under constant evaluation. The life-threatening nature of TEN warrants further confirmation with more extensive, robust randomized, controlled trials.

Lay summary: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a serious skin reaction with a 30% chance of mortality. Commonly TEN is caused by medicines and results in a burn like appearance and sensation in patients. Usually administered medicine is cleared effectively by the human body but when the clearance of few metabolites from medicine is disrupted due to few genes, it leads to an ominous response by the body. This response involves several intermediate chemicals that primarily attack skin cells. Treatment guidelines differ globally. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicine. Currently, a multi-faceted treatment regimen is favored. Treatments like corticosteroids to immunoglobulins are under constant evaluation. Identification of the perfect combination of treatment needs confirmation from robust randomized controlled trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代中毒性表皮坏死松解症的临床表现和治疗摘要。
中毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)是最严重的皮肤不良反应之一,死亡率为30%。由于对TEN的治疗和管理缺乏共识,治疗是个体化的,具体情况具体分析。目的:总结和评估史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)和TEN的科学文献,以帮助和协助确定最佳治疗方案。方法:以“中毒性表皮坏死松解”、“皮质类固醇”、“环孢素”、“依那西普”、“静脉免疫球蛋白”、“Stevens-Johnson综合征”等关键词检索PubMed、Google Scholar等,并按年份进行过滤。对检索产生的研究文章及其参考文献进行了综述。结果:TEN是一种以药物为主的严重皮肤病。世界各地的指导方针在护理计划上各不相同。由于对TEN的管理尚无共识,本文旨在从前人的研究中总结TEN管理方面的有效性和可行性。支持治疗被高度接受,同时早期停用所有药物(水合和电解质)。皮质类固醇和环孢素已用于治疗。目前正在静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG);然而,它们单独使用和联合使用的效果仍不确定。结论:目前主要来自回顾性研究的证据表明,没有一种单独的治疗方法有足够的疗效,多面治疗方案更受青睐。从皮质类固醇到IVIG的治疗方案都在不断评估中。TEN的威胁生命性质值得通过更广泛、可靠的随机对照试验进一步证实。摘要:中毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)是一种严重的皮肤反应,死亡率为30%。通常TEN是由药物引起的,导致患者出现烧伤样的外观和感觉。通常给药的药物能被人体有效地清除,但当药物中少数代谢物的清除因少数基因而中断时,就会导致身体产生不良反应。这种反应涉及几种主要攻击皮肤细胞的中间化学物质。治疗指南在全球各不相同。支持治疗是高度可接受的,同时所有药物的早期停药。目前,多方面的治疗方案是受欢迎的。诸如皮质类固醇或免疫球蛋白之类的治疗方法正在不断地被评估。确定完美的治疗组合需要可靠的随机对照试验的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1