Determining the Factors that Impede or Facilitate the Utilization of Telemedicine (Video Visits) for Geriatric Patients.

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-08-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2022.0018
Onyeche Oche, Richard Dobyns, Cory Lin, Korey A Kennelty
{"title":"Determining the Factors that Impede or Facilitate the Utilization of Telemedicine (Video Visits) for Geriatric Patients.","authors":"Onyeche Oche, Richard Dobyns, Cory Lin, Korey A Kennelty","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2022.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to evaluate the barriers and facilitators of telemedicine utilization experienced by geriatric patients at the University of Iowa Family Medicine Clinic and selected Senior Living Communities in Iowa City, to inform recommendations for improving the telemedicine delivery process for older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was elderly patients (65-85 years old) living independently, and in long-term care facilities, who received health care using telemedicine during the period of the study from March to July 2020. A Mixed Methods study design was utilized with qualitative data collected through semistructured telephone and Zoom interviews and quantitative data through surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 study participants (<i>n</i> = 33) were interviewed or surveyed, including 3 patients (<i>n</i> = 3), 4 caregivers (<i>n</i> = 4), 19 physicians (<i>n</i> = 19), 5 medical assistants (<i>n</i> = 5), and 2 schedulers (<i>n</i> = 2). The results showed that geriatric patients and their caregivers, as well as health and nonhealth care personnel experience barriers, including difficulty navigating technology, privacy concerns, and lack of technical support; and facilitators, such as customer service support and having protocols to guide patients on telemedicine use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Geriatric patients face certain barriers and facilitators (self-identified or identified by their caregivers, physicians, and other health and nonhealth care personnel) that can make it either more or less difficult for them to maximize the benefits of telemedicine. As a result, health systems should consider older adults' needs and preferences when implementing telemedicine systems in outpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":" ","pages":"156-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the barriers and facilitators of telemedicine utilization experienced by geriatric patients at the University of Iowa Family Medicine Clinic and selected Senior Living Communities in Iowa City, to inform recommendations for improving the telemedicine delivery process for older adults.

Methods: The study population was elderly patients (65-85 years old) living independently, and in long-term care facilities, who received health care using telemedicine during the period of the study from March to July 2020. A Mixed Methods study design was utilized with qualitative data collected through semistructured telephone and Zoom interviews and quantitative data through surveys.

Results: A total of 33 study participants (n = 33) were interviewed or surveyed, including 3 patients (n = 3), 4 caregivers (n = 4), 19 physicians (n = 19), 5 medical assistants (n = 5), and 2 schedulers (n = 2). The results showed that geriatric patients and their caregivers, as well as health and nonhealth care personnel experience barriers, including difficulty navigating technology, privacy concerns, and lack of technical support; and facilitators, such as customer service support and having protocols to guide patients on telemedicine use.

Conclusion: Geriatric patients face certain barriers and facilitators (self-identified or identified by their caregivers, physicians, and other health and nonhealth care personnel) that can make it either more or less difficult for them to maximize the benefits of telemedicine. As a result, health systems should consider older adults' needs and preferences when implementing telemedicine systems in outpatient settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定阻碍或促进老年病人使用远程医疗(视频就诊)的因素。
研究目的本研究旨在评估爱荷华大学家庭医学诊所和爱荷华市部分老年生活社区的老年患者在使用远程医疗过程中遇到的障碍和促进因素,为改善老年人远程医疗服务流程提供建议:研究对象为在 2020 年 3 月至 7 月研究期间使用远程医疗接受保健服务的独立生活和长期护理机构中的老年患者(65-85 岁)。研究采用混合方法设计,通过半结构化电话访谈和变焦访谈收集定性数据,通过调查收集定量数据:共有 33 名研究参与者(n = 33)接受了访谈或调查,其中包括 3 名患者(n = 3)、4 名护理人员(n = 4)、19 名医生(n = 19)、5 名医疗助理(n = 5)和 2 名调度员(n = 2)。结果表明,老年病人及其护理人员、医护人员和非医护人员遇到了障碍,包括难以驾驭技术、隐私问题和缺乏技术支持;也遇到了促进因素,如客户服务支持和有指导病人使用远程医疗的协议:结论:老年病人面临着某些障碍和促进因素(自我认定或由其护理人员、医生及其他医疗保健人员和非医疗保健人员认定),这些障碍和因素会增加或减少他们最大限度地利用远程医疗的难度。因此,医疗系统在门诊环境中实施远程医疗系统时,应考虑老年人的需求和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to : “A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake:Results from a National Consensus Conference” by Kristin L. Rising et al. Telemed Report 2023;4(1): 387–395; doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0051 The Impact of Waiting Times on Behavioral Outcomes for Children with Otitis Media: Results from an Urban Ear, Nose, and Throat Telehealth Service Factors Associated with the Digital Patient Experience of Virtual Care Across Specialties. Telemedicine in Brazil: Teleconsultations at the Largest University Hospital in the Country. Achieving Digital Health Equity by Personalizing the Patient Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1