Radiation doses in endovascular revascularisation of lower-extremity arterial diseases.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Journal of Africa Pub Date : 2023-09-23 Epub Date: 2022-09-23 DOI:10.5830/CVJA-2022-046
Ibrahim Çağrı Kaya, Fatma Altuntaş Kaya
{"title":"Radiation doses in endovascular revascularisation of lower-extremity arterial diseases.","authors":"Ibrahim Çağrı Kaya, Fatma Altuntaş Kaya","doi":"10.5830/CVJA-2022-046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of percutaneous endovascular intervention in lower-extremity arterial diseases is increasing daily. With the growing technical experience of vascular surgeons, this is preferred to open surgery in more complex lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dose area product (DAP) and fluoro (FL) time values of 150 patients who underwent successful peripheral endovascular arterial intervention were analysed retrospectively. These values were evaluated by grouping according to the anatomical region and complexity of the lesion, type of procedure and arterial access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the mean DAP was 18 ± 27 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> in patients who underwent only angioplasty, it was 21 ± 17 Gy cm<sup>2</sup> in patients who underwent stent implantation after angioplasty ( <i>p</i> = 0.069). The DAP value was statistically significantly higher in patients who had intervention in the pelvic region, both in the angioplasty (23 ± 22 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>) group and in the stenting (29 ± 18 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>) group, than in patients who had intervention in the femoropopliteal region (18 ± 27 and 15 ± 12 Gy cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). When the correlation between body mass index (BMI) of the patients and DAP was examined, a moderate positive correlation was found both in the pelvic region (<i>r</i> = 0.601, <i>p</i> = 0.00) and in the femoropopliteal region (<i>r</i> = 0.512, <i>p</i> = 0.00). Out of 78 patients in whom the ipsilateral popliteal retrograde approach was preferred, only two developed arteriovenous fistulae after the procedure, and only two of 77 patients in whom the femoral approach was preferred developed no major or minor complications, except femoral pseudo-aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most important factors affecting the radiation doses of the patients were the anatomical region and the patient's BMI. Radiation doses were higher in pelvic interventions compared to the femoropopliteal region. This may encourage the choice of arterial approaches that can minimise visualisation of the pelvic region in particular. Therefore, attention should be paid to pre-operative planning, especially in patients undergoing multiple diagnostic and therapeutic imaging. The ipsilateral popliteal retrograde approach can be safely chosen in combined iliofemoral, common femoral and superficial femoral total occlusions in the hands of surgeons with good Doppler ultrasonography experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":9434,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10870311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2022-046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of percutaneous endovascular intervention in lower-extremity arterial diseases is increasing daily. With the growing technical experience of vascular surgeons, this is preferred to open surgery in more complex lesions.

Methods: The dose area product (DAP) and fluoro (FL) time values of 150 patients who underwent successful peripheral endovascular arterial intervention were analysed retrospectively. These values were evaluated by grouping according to the anatomical region and complexity of the lesion, type of procedure and arterial access.

Results: While the mean DAP was 18 ± 27 Gy cm2 in patients who underwent only angioplasty, it was 21 ± 17 Gy cm2 in patients who underwent stent implantation after angioplasty ( p = 0.069). The DAP value was statistically significantly higher in patients who had intervention in the pelvic region, both in the angioplasty (23 ± 22 Gy cm2) group and in the stenting (29 ± 18 Gy cm2) group, than in patients who had intervention in the femoropopliteal region (18 ± 27 and 15 ± 12 Gy cm2, respectively) (p < 0.05). When the correlation between body mass index (BMI) of the patients and DAP was examined, a moderate positive correlation was found both in the pelvic region (r = 0.601, p = 0.00) and in the femoropopliteal region (r = 0.512, p = 0.00). Out of 78 patients in whom the ipsilateral popliteal retrograde approach was preferred, only two developed arteriovenous fistulae after the procedure, and only two of 77 patients in whom the femoral approach was preferred developed no major or minor complications, except femoral pseudo-aneurysm.

Conclusions: The most important factors affecting the radiation doses of the patients were the anatomical region and the patient's BMI. Radiation doses were higher in pelvic interventions compared to the femoropopliteal region. This may encourage the choice of arterial approaches that can minimise visualisation of the pelvic region in particular. Therefore, attention should be paid to pre-operative planning, especially in patients undergoing multiple diagnostic and therapeutic imaging. The ipsilateral popliteal retrograde approach can be safely chosen in combined iliofemoral, common femoral and superficial femoral total occlusions in the hands of surgeons with good Doppler ultrasonography experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢动脉疾病血管内血运重建中的放射剂量。
背景:经皮血管内介入治疗下肢动脉疾病的应用日益增多。随着血管外科医生技术经验的不断丰富,在更复杂的病变中,这是首选的开放手术。方法:对150例成功接受外周血管内介入治疗的患者的剂量-面积乘积(DAP)和荧光时间值进行回顾性分析。根据病变的解剖区域和复杂性、手术类型和动脉通路对这些值进行分组评估。结果:仅接受血管成形术的患者的平均DAP为18±27 Gy cm2,而在血管成形术后接受支架植入的患者的DAP为21±17 Gy cm2(p=0.069)。在骨盆区域进行干预的患者中,无论是血管成形术(23±22 Gy cm2)组还是支架植入术(29±18 Gy cm2,与在股腘区进行干预的患者相比(分别为18±27和15±12Gy cm2)(p<0.05),骨盆区(r=0.601,p=0.00)和股腘区(r=0.512,p=0.00,77名首选股骨入路的患者中,只有两名除股骨假性动脉瘤外没有出现重大或次要并发症。结论:影响患者辐射剂量的最重要因素是解剖区域和患者的BMI。与股腘区相比,骨盆介入治疗的放射剂量更高。这可能会鼓励选择动脉入路,尤其是可以最大限度地减少骨盆区域的可视化。因此,应注意术前计划,尤其是在接受多种诊断和治疗成像的患者中。具有良好多普勒超声经验的外科医生可以安全地选择同侧腘逆行入路治疗髂股、股总动脉和股浅部完全闭塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cardiovascular Journal of Africa (CVJA) is an international peer-reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include coronary disease, electrophysiology, valve disease, imaging techniques, congenital heart disease (fetal, paediatric and adult), heart failure, surgery, and basic science.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in patients' understanding of cardiovascular disease management. High intracardiac clot burden in a young mother with peripartum cardiomyopathy in Uganda. The temporal relationship between body composition and cardiometabolic profiles in an HIV-infected (on antiretroviral therapy) versus HIV-free Western Cape study population. Evaluation of cardiac function in paediatric Wilson's disease patients with advanced echocardiographic modalities (strain and strain rate echocardiography). The role of C-reactive protein:albumin ratio and Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio in predicting coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1