Efficacy of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Based on Antibody Concentration.

Q3 Medicine Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2022-09-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7992927
Wesley V Cain, Anne M Sill, Vinod Solipuram, John J Weiss, Carole B Miller, Peter F Jelsma
{"title":"Efficacy of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Based on Antibody Concentration.","authors":"Wesley V Cain,&nbsp;Anne M Sill,&nbsp;Vinod Solipuram,&nbsp;John J Weiss,&nbsp;Carole B Miller,&nbsp;Peter F Jelsma","doi":"10.1155/2022/7992927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Convalescent plasma obtained from individuals who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) contains neutralizing antibodies to the virus and has been frequently used as a treatment in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study involving 96 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to having received either high antibody concentration convalescent plasma or low antibody concentration convalescent plasma. Quantitative measurements of IgG to the receptor-binding domain (RBD), the S1 subunit of the spike protein, and the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein were determined from donor plasma samples. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following convalescent plasma administration in regard to each of the three antibody domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the nucleocapsid antibody domain, death occurred in 22.2% of patients in the low antibody concentration group versus 23.5% in the high antibody concentration group (<i>p</i>=0.88). Within the RBD antibody domain, death occurred in 22.9% of patients in both the low and the high antibody concentration groups (<i>p</i>=1.0). Within the S1 subunit antibody domain, death occurred in 27.1% of patients in the low antibody concentration group versus 18.8% in the high antibody concentration group (<i>p</i>=0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences were observed between low and high concentration convalescent plasma in regard to overall mortality at 30 days, hospital length of stay, number of ventilator days, and subsequent receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients who were previously not receiving mechanical ventilation. <i>Trial Registration</i>. This study was not associated with a clinical trial due to the retrospective nature of study design.</p>","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"7992927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509285/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7992927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Convalescent plasma obtained from individuals who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) contains neutralizing antibodies to the virus and has been frequently used as a treatment in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study involving 96 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to having received either high antibody concentration convalescent plasma or low antibody concentration convalescent plasma. Quantitative measurements of IgG to the receptor-binding domain (RBD), the S1 subunit of the spike protein, and the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein were determined from donor plasma samples. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following convalescent plasma administration in regard to each of the three antibody domains.

Results: Within the nucleocapsid antibody domain, death occurred in 22.2% of patients in the low antibody concentration group versus 23.5% in the high antibody concentration group (p=0.88). Within the RBD antibody domain, death occurred in 22.9% of patients in both the low and the high antibody concentration groups (p=1.0). Within the S1 subunit antibody domain, death occurred in 27.1% of patients in the low antibody concentration group versus 18.8% in the high antibody concentration group (p=0.33).

Conclusions: No significant differences were observed between low and high concentration convalescent plasma in regard to overall mortality at 30 days, hospital length of stay, number of ventilator days, and subsequent receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients who were previously not receiving mechanical ventilation. Trial Registration. This study was not associated with a clinical trial due to the retrospective nature of study design.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于抗体浓度的COVID-19恢复期血浆疗效观察
背景:从严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)患者康复后获得的恢复期血浆中含有该病毒的中和抗体,常被用于治疗重症COVID-19住院患者。方法:采用回顾性、观察性队列研究,纳入96例住院重症COVID-19患者,按照1:1的比例分配给接受高抗体浓度恢复期血浆和低抗体浓度恢复期血浆的患者。从供体血浆样品中定量测定受体结合域(RBD)、刺突蛋白S1亚基和SARS-CoV-2核衣壳(N)蛋白的IgG。主要结局是恢复期血浆给药后30天内三种抗体结构域的全因死亡率。结果:在核衣壳抗体区域内,低抗体浓度组死亡率为22.2%,高抗体浓度组死亡率为23.5% (p=0.88)。在RBD抗体域内,低抗体浓度组和高抗体浓度组的患者死亡率均为22.9% (p=1.0)。在S1亚基抗体结构域内,低抗体浓度组的死亡率为27.1%,高抗体浓度组为18.8% (p=0.33)。结论:低浓度和高浓度恢复期血浆患者在30天总死亡率、住院时间、呼吸机天数以及随后未接受机械通气的患者接受有创机械通气方面无显著差异。试验注册。由于研究设计的回顾性性质,本研究与临床试验无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Hematology
Advances in Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variability in Notification of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Sickle Cell Trait Across the United States. Early Molecular Response to Imatinib First-Line Therapy and Predictive Factors of Poor Outcomes for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Côte d'Ivoire. Relationships Between Markers of Iron Status and Hematological Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease. A Comparative Analysis of Hydroxyurea Treatment on Coagulation Profile Among Sickle Cell Anaemia Children in Lagos, Nigeria. Advancements in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: From Signaling Pathways to Targeted Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1