Are Wealthy Older Adults who use Medicaid Opportunistically Accessing the Program?

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-03 Epub Date: 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2022.2127597
Marc A Cohen, Jane Tavares
{"title":"Are Wealthy Older Adults who use Medicaid Opportunistically Accessing the Program?","authors":"Marc A Cohen, Jane Tavares","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2022.2127597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicaid is the largest payer of long-term services and supports (LTSS) and millions of older Americans rely on this means-tested program, especially during late life. There has been longstanding concern that wealthy older adults may be accessing the program by opportunistically divesting assets in order to qualify for coverage rather than by having high medical or LTSS expenses on which they spend down their resources to eligibility levels. Few current studies analyze this question longitudinally. Thus, questions remain about whether states need to tighten asset eligibility rules to prevent opportunistic asset divestiture. This analysis explores robust longitudinal data to determine the extent to which older, wealthier Americans accessing Medicaid do so by engaging in opportunistic asset transfer. Our findings demonstrate that this may occur among a relatively small proportion of wealthy people, and that tightening Medicaid eligibility criteria would likely have only a very modest impact on program expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2022.2127597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medicaid is the largest payer of long-term services and supports (LTSS) and millions of older Americans rely on this means-tested program, especially during late life. There has been longstanding concern that wealthy older adults may be accessing the program by opportunistically divesting assets in order to qualify for coverage rather than by having high medical or LTSS expenses on which they spend down their resources to eligibility levels. Few current studies analyze this question longitudinally. Thus, questions remain about whether states need to tighten asset eligibility rules to prevent opportunistic asset divestiture. This analysis explores robust longitudinal data to determine the extent to which older, wealthier Americans accessing Medicaid do so by engaging in opportunistic asset transfer. Our findings demonstrate that this may occur among a relatively small proportion of wealthy people, and that tightening Medicaid eligibility criteria would likely have only a very modest impact on program expenditures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用医疗补助计划的富裕老年人是在伺机利用该计划吗?
医疗补助计划(Medicaid)是长期服务和支持(LTSS)的最大支付方,数以百万计的美国老年人依赖于这项经济情况调查计划,尤其是在晚年。长期以来,人们一直担心富裕的老年人可能会通过投机取巧的方式将资产剥离以获得参保资格,而不是通过高额的医疗或长期服务与支持费用将其资源花到符合参保资格的水平。目前很少有研究对这一问题进行纵向分析。因此,关于各州是否需要收紧资产资格规则以防止投机性资产剥离的问题依然存在。本分析探讨了可靠的纵向数据,以确定较富裕的美国老年人在多大程度上通过参与机会性资产转移来获得医疗补助。我们的研究结果表明,这种情况可能发生在相对较小比例的富人中,而收紧《医疗补助计划》的资格标准可能只会对计划支出产生非常小的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
期刊最新文献
Does Social Support Alleviate the Caregiving Burden of Adult Children? Evidence from Chinese Long-Term Care Insurance Pilot Program. Mass Media Exposure Moderates the Association of Education and Wealth with Enrollment in Health Insurance Among Older Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in India. The Impact of Age-Based COVID-19 Pandemic Regulations on Older People in Turkey: A Capability Approach. Provision of Home & Community Based Services to Veterans by Race, Rurality, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index. Understanding Organizational Resilience of Care Homes for Older People During COVID-19 in China: A Qualitative Study with Post-Pandemic Policy Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1