Optimal indication of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using Konyang Standard Method in benign gallbladder diseases.

Seung Jae Lee, In Seok Choi, Ju Ik Moon, Dae Sung Yoon, Won Jun Choi, Sang Eok Lee, Nak Song Sung, Seong Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Roh, Sung Gon Kim
{"title":"Optimal indication of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using Konyang Standard Method in benign gallbladder diseases.","authors":"Seung Jae Lee,&nbsp;In Seok Choi,&nbsp;Ju Ik Moon,&nbsp;Dae Sung Yoon,&nbsp;Won Jun Choi,&nbsp;Sang Eok Lee,&nbsp;Nak Song Sung,&nbsp;Seong Uk Kwon,&nbsp;In Eui Bae,&nbsp;Seung Jae Roh,&nbsp;Sung Gon Kim","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2022.25.3.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal indications for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) have not yet been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent SILC between April 2010 and June 2020. Difficult surgery (DS) (conversion to multiport or open cholecystectomy, adjacent organ injury, operation time of ≥90 minutes, or estimated blood loss of ≥100 mL) and poor postoperative outcome (PPO) (postoperative hospital stay ≥ 7 days or Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications) were defined to comprehensively evaluate surgical difficulty and postoperative outcomes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,405 patients (mean age, 51.2 years; 802 female [57.1%]), 427 (grade I, n = 358; grade II/III, n = 69) underwent SILC for acute cholecystitis (AC), 34 (2.4%) needed conversion to multiport (n = 33) or open cholecystectomy (n = 1), 7 (0.5%) had adjacent organ injury during surgery, and 49 (3.5%) developed postoperative complications. Of the patients, 89 and 52 had DS and PPO, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, grade I AC, grade II/III AC, and body mass index of ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were significant predictors of DS. Age of ≥70 years and DS were significant predictors of PPO. In a subgroup analysis of patients with AC, DS (9.5% vs. 27.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PPO (5.0% vs. 15.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were more frequent in patients with grade II/III AC than in those with grade I AC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SILC is not recommended in patients with grade II/III AC and should be carefully performed by experienced and well-trained surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/58/jmis-25-3-97.PMC9494018.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2022.25.3.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal indications for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) have not yet been established.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent SILC between April 2010 and June 2020. Difficult surgery (DS) (conversion to multiport or open cholecystectomy, adjacent organ injury, operation time of ≥90 minutes, or estimated blood loss of ≥100 mL) and poor postoperative outcome (PPO) (postoperative hospital stay ≥ 7 days or Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications) were defined to comprehensively evaluate surgical difficulty and postoperative outcomes, respectively.

Results: Of 1,405 patients (mean age, 51.2 years; 802 female [57.1%]), 427 (grade I, n = 358; grade II/III, n = 69) underwent SILC for acute cholecystitis (AC), 34 (2.4%) needed conversion to multiport (n = 33) or open cholecystectomy (n = 1), 7 (0.5%) had adjacent organ injury during surgery, and 49 (3.5%) developed postoperative complications. Of the patients, 89 and 52 had DS and PPO, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, grade I AC, grade II/III AC, and body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 were significant predictors of DS. Age of ≥70 years and DS were significant predictors of PPO. In a subgroup analysis of patients with AC, DS (9.5% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.001) and PPO (5.0% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.001) were more frequent in patients with grade II/III AC than in those with grade I AC.

Conclusion: SILC is not recommended in patients with grade II/III AC and should be carefully performed by experienced and well-trained surgeons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康阳标准法单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗良性胆囊疾病的最佳适应证。
目的:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的最佳适应证尚未确定。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年4月至2020年6月期间接受SILC治疗的连续患者。分别定义手术困难(DS)(转多口或开腹胆囊切除术、邻近脏器损伤、手术时间≥90分钟或估计失血量≥100 mL)和术后预后差(PPO)(术后住院时间≥7天或术后并发症Clavien-Dindo分级≥II),综合评价手术难度和术后结局。结果:1405例患者(平均年龄51.2岁;女性802例[57.1%]),427例(一级,n = 358;II/III级(n = 69)患者因急性胆囊炎(AC)接受了SILC手术,34例(2.4%)患者需要转行多腔胆囊切除术(n = 33)或开腹胆囊切除术(n = 1), 7例(0.5%)患者术中相邻器官损伤,49例(3.5%)患者出现术后并发症。在这些患者中,分别有89例DS和52例PPO。在多变量分析中,I级AC、II/III级AC和体重指数≥30 kg/m2是DS的显著预测因子。年龄≥70岁和DS是PPO的显著预测因子。在AC患者的亚组分析中,DS (9.5% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.001)和PPO (5.0% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.001)在II/III级AC患者中比在I级AC患者中更常见。结论:II/III级AC患者不推荐SILC,应由经验丰富且训练有素的外科医生谨慎操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute peritonitis caused by a ruptured urachal cyst accompanied by omphalitis in an adult: a case report and literature review. Analyzing the emergence of surgical robotics in Africa: a scoping review of pioneering procedures, platforms utilized, and outcome meta-analysis. Assessment of mechanical bowel preparation prior to nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery era: insights from a national database analysis in the United States. Automated machine learning with R: AutoML tools for beginners in clinical research. Is prophylactic abdominal drainage mandatory in laparoscopic hemicolectomy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1