Am I a responsible drinker? The impact of message frame and drinker prototypes on perceptions of alcohol product information labels.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2022.2129055
Emma Davies, Joel Lewin, Matt Field
{"title":"Am I a responsible drinker? The impact of message frame and drinker prototypes on perceptions of alcohol product information labels.","authors":"Emma Davies, Joel Lewin, Matt Field","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2022.2129055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current alcohol product labelling tends to include ambiguous messages such as 'drink responsibly'. Consumers who identify as responsible drinkers may not pay heed to health warning messages, believing that they are not the intended target.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to determine how responses to responsible drinking labels would differ from responses to positively and negatively framed health messages. We also explored if prototype perceptions would moderate the message impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A between groups, three arm (ambiguous, positive or negative messages) experiment recruited 465 participants. Outcomes were drinking intentions and label acceptability (novelty, believability, personal relevance, and potential to change behaviour). Measures of heavy and responsible drinker prototype perceptions were included for exploratory moderation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive and negative messages were rated significantly more likely to change behaviour than ambiguous messages. There was also a moderation effect: participants with stronger favourability and similarity to the responsible drinker prototype intended to drink more alcohol in the future after exposure to negatively framed labels, but not after exposure to ambiguous or positively framed labels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Drink responsibly' messages are unlikely to lead to behaviour change. Incorporating theoretical moderators may have value in developing our understanding of the impact of alcohol product labelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2129055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current alcohol product labelling tends to include ambiguous messages such as 'drink responsibly'. Consumers who identify as responsible drinkers may not pay heed to health warning messages, believing that they are not the intended target.

Aims: We aimed to determine how responses to responsible drinking labels would differ from responses to positively and negatively framed health messages. We also explored if prototype perceptions would moderate the message impact.

Methods: A between groups, three arm (ambiguous, positive or negative messages) experiment recruited 465 participants. Outcomes were drinking intentions and label acceptability (novelty, believability, personal relevance, and potential to change behaviour). Measures of heavy and responsible drinker prototype perceptions were included for exploratory moderation analyses.

Results: Positive and negative messages were rated significantly more likely to change behaviour than ambiguous messages. There was also a moderation effect: participants with stronger favourability and similarity to the responsible drinker prototype intended to drink more alcohol in the future after exposure to negatively framed labels, but not after exposure to ambiguous or positively framed labels.

Discussion: Drink responsibly' messages are unlikely to lead to behaviour change. Incorporating theoretical moderators may have value in developing our understanding of the impact of alcohol product labelling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我是一个负责任的饮酒者吗?信息框架和饮酒者原型对酒类产品信息标签认知的影响。
背景:目前的酒类产品标签往往包含 "负责任地饮酒 "等模棱两可的信息。目的:我们旨在确定消费者对负责任饮酒标签的反应与对正面和负面健康信息的反应有何不同。我们还探讨了原型认知是否会缓和信息的影响:方法:我们招募了 465 名参与者,进行了分组间三臂实验(含糊信息、正面信息或负面信息)。实验结果是饮酒意愿和标签可接受性(新颖性、可信度、个人相关性和改变行为的潜力)。对重度饮酒者和负责任饮酒者原型认知的测量被纳入探索性调节分析:结果:正面和负面信息改变行为的可能性明显高于模棱两可的信息。此外,还存在调节效应:与负责任的饮酒者原型具有较高好感度和相似度的受试者在接触负面信息后打算在未来喝更多的酒,而接触模糊或正面信息后则没有这种打算:讨论:"负责任地饮酒 "信息不太可能导致行为改变。讨论:"负责任地喝酒 "的信息不太可能导致行为改变,纳入理论调节因素可能有助于加深我们对酒类产品标签影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Broad versus narrow bandwidth measures of experienced automaticity for physical activity. Fluctuations in core depressive symptoms in colorectal cancer patients. A prospective, population-based PROFILES-registry study. Understanding the experiences and psychosocial support needs of caregivers of people with comorbid dementia and cancer. Improving adult eating behaviours by manipulating time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis. We meat again: a field study on the moderating role of location-specific consumer preferences in nudging vegetarian options.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1