Effect of Biofeedback Corrective Exercise on Reaction Time and Central Somatosensory Conduction Time in Patients With Forward Head Posture and Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Ayman A. Mohamed PhD , Yih-Kuen Jan PhD , Neveen Abdel Raoof PhD , Omaima Kattabei PhD , Ibrahim Moustafa PhD , Hanan Hosny MD
{"title":"Effect of Biofeedback Corrective Exercise on Reaction Time and Central Somatosensory Conduction Time in Patients With Forward Head Posture and Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"Ayman A. Mohamed PhD ,&nbsp;Yih-Kuen Jan PhD ,&nbsp;Neveen Abdel Raoof PhD ,&nbsp;Omaima Kattabei PhD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Moustafa PhD ,&nbsp;Hanan Hosny MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of 8 weeks of biofeedback on reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time </span>in patients<span><span> with forward head posture and </span>cervical radiculopathy.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We performed a double-blinded randomized controlled trial<span>. Seventy patients with forward head posture and cervical radiculopathy were randomly distributed into study and control groups. The study group received biofeedback forward head posture corrective exercise for 8 weeks, while the control group did not receive any treatment. The main outcome measures were reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time. The secondary outcome measures were the craniovertebral angles, </span></span>nerve conduction time<span> at N13<span> and N20, referred arm pain, and neck disability index.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After 4 weeks, there were nonsignificant differences between both groups in reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time (<em>P</em> &gt; .05); while there were significant differences between both groups in N13, N20, craniovertebral angle, referred arm pain, and neck disability index scores (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). After 8 weeks, there were significant differences between both groups in all outcome measures (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, participants receiving biofeedback forward head posture corrective exercise improved both reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time after 8 weeks when compared to a control, nontreatment group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of 8 weeks of biofeedback on reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time in patients with forward head posture and cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

We performed a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Seventy patients with forward head posture and cervical radiculopathy were randomly distributed into study and control groups. The study group received biofeedback forward head posture corrective exercise for 8 weeks, while the control group did not receive any treatment. The main outcome measures were reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time. The secondary outcome measures were the craniovertebral angles, nerve conduction time at N13 and N20, referred arm pain, and neck disability index.

Results

After 4 weeks, there were nonsignificant differences between both groups in reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time (P > .05); while there were significant differences between both groups in N13, N20, craniovertebral angle, referred arm pain, and neck disability index scores (P < .05). After 8 weeks, there were significant differences between both groups in all outcome measures (P < .05).

Conclusion

In this study, participants receiving biofeedback forward head posture corrective exercise improved both reaction time and central somatosensory conduction time after 8 weeks when compared to a control, nontreatment group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物反馈矫正运动对前倾头位和神经根病患者反应时间和中枢体感传导时间的影响:一项随机对照研究
目的探讨8周生物反馈对前倾头位颈神经根病患者反应时间和中枢体感传导时间的影响。方法采用双盲随机对照试验。将70例前倾头位伴颈神经根病患者随机分为研究组和对照组。研究组接受生物反馈头前姿势矫正训练,为期8周,对照组不接受任何治疗。主要观察指标为反应时间和中枢体感传导时间。次要观察指标为颅椎角、N13和N20时的神经传导时间、牵涉性手臂疼痛和颈部残疾指数。结果4周后,两组患者的反应时间和中枢体感传导时间(P >. 05);两组患者在N13、N20、颅椎角、牵涉性臂痛、颈部残疾指数评分方面差异均有统计学意义(P <. 05)。8周后,两组在所有结局指标上均有显著差异(P <. 05)。在本研究中,与未接受治疗的对照组相比,接受生物反馈头部姿势矫正运动的参与者在8周后的反应时间和中枢体感传导时间都有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1