COVID-19 Infectious Disease Prevention and Mitigation Practices by Chiropractic Physicians and Licensed Massage Therapists in Mississippi: A Needs Assessment to Inform Health Education and Promotion
Robert A. Leach DC, MS , Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD , Jeffrey A. King DC, MS , Marion W. Evans Jr DC, PhD
{"title":"COVID-19 Infectious Disease Prevention and Mitigation Practices by Chiropractic Physicians and Licensed Massage Therapists in Mississippi: A Needs Assessment to Inform Health Education and Promotion","authors":"Robert A. Leach DC, MS , Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD , Jeffrey A. King DC, MS , Marion W. Evans Jr DC, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported infection prevention processes and their effect on businesses of chiropractic doctors (DCs) and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in Mississippi during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed a survey that was electronically delivered to all licensed DCs and LMTs in Mississippi between August and September 2020. Assessments were made using Qualtrics software, with data management and subsequent analysis including Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Responses were based on 32 of 323 DCs and 69 of 934 LMTs that were still seeing patients through the pandemic (n = 101, response rate 8%). The DC and LMT practitioners (94%) used treatment table and/or surface sanitizing (91.8%) and hand washing and/or sanitizing (89.8%) between all patients. Female practitioners reported practicing handwashing for at least 20 seconds, whereas male practitioners reported practicing handwashing for at least 15 seconds (<em>P</em> < .001). DCs were more likely to report using gloves for personal protective equipment, and LMTs were more likely to report using face masks (<em>P</em> < .001). Other COVID-19 procedures included limiting practice to acute care (82.5%), checking all patient temperatures (62.9%), sign-in and wait in the car (53.2% LMT vs 6.5% DC, <em>P</em> < .001), and prohibiting all nonpatient visitors (87.7% LMTs vs 9.4% DCs, <em>P</em> < .001). DCs (96.9%) and LMTs (89.9%) reported making referrals for COVID-19 testing or treatment when indicated. LMTs (82.3%) reported seeing fewer patients (<em>P</em> = .03), and older practitioners reported the most economic impact (<em>P</em> = .003) by the pandemic. Patient concerns and LMTs needing more time to perform infection control (<em>P</em> = .04) were reasons cited by practitioners for the reduced number of visits seen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most respondents had moderate to high compliance with guidelines on recommended infection prevention processes during fall 2020 of the COVID-19 pandemic. This assessment of compliance may be used to help guide future health education and promotion research of disease prevention and mitigation as well as physical and economic burdens faced by DCs and LMTs in Mississippi during a pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported infection prevention processes and their effect on businesses of chiropractic doctors (DCs) and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in Mississippi during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
We developed a survey that was electronically delivered to all licensed DCs and LMTs in Mississippi between August and September 2020. Assessments were made using Qualtrics software, with data management and subsequent analysis including Pearson's χ2 test.
Results
Responses were based on 32 of 323 DCs and 69 of 934 LMTs that were still seeing patients through the pandemic (n = 101, response rate 8%). The DC and LMT practitioners (94%) used treatment table and/or surface sanitizing (91.8%) and hand washing and/or sanitizing (89.8%) between all patients. Female practitioners reported practicing handwashing for at least 20 seconds, whereas male practitioners reported practicing handwashing for at least 15 seconds (P < .001). DCs were more likely to report using gloves for personal protective equipment, and LMTs were more likely to report using face masks (P < .001). Other COVID-19 procedures included limiting practice to acute care (82.5%), checking all patient temperatures (62.9%), sign-in and wait in the car (53.2% LMT vs 6.5% DC, P < .001), and prohibiting all nonpatient visitors (87.7% LMTs vs 9.4% DCs, P < .001). DCs (96.9%) and LMTs (89.9%) reported making referrals for COVID-19 testing or treatment when indicated. LMTs (82.3%) reported seeing fewer patients (P = .03), and older practitioners reported the most economic impact (P = .003) by the pandemic. Patient concerns and LMTs needing more time to perform infection control (P = .04) were reasons cited by practitioners for the reduced number of visits seen.
Conclusion
Most respondents had moderate to high compliance with guidelines on recommended infection prevention processes during fall 2020 of the COVID-19 pandemic. This assessment of compliance may be used to help guide future health education and promotion research of disease prevention and mitigation as well as physical and economic burdens faced by DCs and LMTs in Mississippi during a pandemic.
目的本研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间密西西比州脊椎病医生(dc)和执业按摩治疗师(LMTs)自我报告的感染预防流程及其对业务的影响。方法:我们开发了一项调查,该调查于2020年8月至9月期间以电子方式交付给密西西比州的所有有执照的dc和LMTs。采用Qualtrics软件进行评估,数据管理及后续分析包括Pearson χ2检验。结果323个dc中的32个和934个lmt中的69个在大流行期间仍在治疗患者(n = 101,有效率为8%)。DC和LMT从业者(94%)在所有患者之间使用治疗台和/或表面消毒(91.8%)和洗手和/或消毒(89.8%)。据报告,女学员至少练习洗手20秒,而男学员至少练习洗手15秒(P <措施)。DCs更有可能报告使用手套作为个人防护装备,而ltts更有可能报告使用口罩(P <措施)。其他COVID-19程序包括将实践限制在急性护理(82.5%),检查所有患者体温(62.9%),签到并在车内等待(LMT 53.2% vs DC 6.5%)。.001),并禁止所有非患者探视(87.7%的LMTs vs 9.4%的DCs, P <措施)。dc(96.9%)和LMTs(89.9%)报告在需要时转诊进行COVID-19检测或治疗。lmt(82.3%)报告患者较少(P = .03),老年从业者报告受疫情影响最大(P = .003)。患者的担忧和LMTs需要更多的时间来进行感染控制(P = .04)是医生认为就诊次数减少的原因。结论大多数受访者对2020年秋季COVID-19大流行期间推荐的感染预防流程指南的依从性中等至高度。这种依从性评估可用于帮助指导未来的健康教育和促进疾病预防和减轻的研究,以及流行病期间密西西比州dc和LMTs面临的身体和经济负担。