Researching nurses' adherence to patient safety guidelines in emergency departments.

Q3 Nursing Emergency Nurse Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.7748/en.2022.e2129
Candra Panji Asmoro, Rr Tutik Sri Hariyati, Dumilah Ayuningtyas, Jahja Umar, Dwi Yanti Rachmasari Tartila
{"title":"Researching nurses' adherence to patient safety guidelines in emergency departments.","authors":"Candra Panji Asmoro, Rr Tutik Sri Hariyati, Dumilah Ayuningtyas, Jahja Umar, Dwi Yanti Rachmasari Tartila","doi":"10.7748/en.2022.e2129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the reasons why patient safety may be put at risk during healthcare interventions is a lack of staff adherence to patient safety guidelines. There could be a relationship between staff's adherence to patient safety guidelines and their perceived level of reward for their work and/or motivation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between reward and adherence to patient safety guidelines, and between motivation and adherence to patient safety guidelines, among nurses working in emergency departments (EDs) in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of 101 nurses working in the EDs of four hospitals in Indonesia. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data on the level of reward participants felt they received for their work, the level of participants' motivation for their work, and participants' adherence to patient safety guidelines. Spearman's rank correlation testing was used to determine the relationships between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant negative relationship between reward and adherence (P=0.019, r=-0.233), which meant that those who perceived their reward as low were more likely to adhere to patient safety guidelines than those who felt they were highly rewarded. There was a statistically significant positive relationship between motivation and adherence to patient safety guidelines (P=0.017, r=0.236), which meant that the higher the motivation, the higher participants' level of adherence to patient safety guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ensuring ED nurses are motivated for their work by offering rewards - such as a decent salary, a supportive workplace environment and career progression opportunities - is important to enhance their adherence to patient safety guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":35711,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Nurse","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2022.e2129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the reasons why patient safety may be put at risk during healthcare interventions is a lack of staff adherence to patient safety guidelines. There could be a relationship between staff's adherence to patient safety guidelines and their perceived level of reward for their work and/or motivation.

Aim: To examine the relationship between reward and adherence to patient safety guidelines, and between motivation and adherence to patient safety guidelines, among nurses working in emergency departments (EDs) in Indonesia.

Method: This was a cross-sectional study of 101 nurses working in the EDs of four hospitals in Indonesia. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data on the level of reward participants felt they received for their work, the level of participants' motivation for their work, and participants' adherence to patient safety guidelines. Spearman's rank correlation testing was used to determine the relationships between variables.

Results: There was a statistically significant negative relationship between reward and adherence (P=0.019, r=-0.233), which meant that those who perceived their reward as low were more likely to adhere to patient safety guidelines than those who felt they were highly rewarded. There was a statistically significant positive relationship between motivation and adherence to patient safety guidelines (P=0.017, r=0.236), which meant that the higher the motivation, the higher participants' level of adherence to patient safety guidelines.

Conclusion: Ensuring ED nurses are motivated for their work by offering rewards - such as a decent salary, a supportive workplace environment and career progression opportunities - is important to enhance their adherence to patient safety guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究急诊科护士对患者安全指南的遵守情况。
背景:在医疗干预过程中,患者安全受到威胁的原因之一是员工不遵守患者安全指南。目的:研究在印度尼西亚急诊科(ED)工作的护士中,奖励与遵守患者安全指南之间的关系,以及积极性与遵守患者安全指南之间的关系:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象是印度尼西亚四家医院急诊科的 101 名护士。研究采用自我报告问卷调查的方式收集数据,内容包括参与者认为自己在工作中获得的回报水平、参与者的工作积极性水平以及参与者对患者安全指南的遵守情况。斯皮尔曼秩相关检验用于确定变量之间的关系:在统计学上,奖励与遵守之间存在明显的负相关(P=0.019,r=-0.233),这意味着认为自己奖励低的人比认为自己奖励高的人更有可能遵守患者安全指南。激励与遵守患者安全指南之间存在统计学意义上的正相关关系(P=0.017,r=0.236),这意味着激励越高,参与者遵守患者安全指南的程度越高:结论:确保急诊科护士的工作积极性,为其提供奖励--如体面的薪酬、支持性的工作环境和职业发展机会--对于提高他们对患者安全指南的依从性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Nurse
Emergency Nurse Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
A united nursing front can change blame and toxic-centred cultures Keep it clear to engage your readers So you would like to be an advanced practitioner How to turn around a toxic culture of blame and shame Bowing fractures of the forearm in children: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1