Access to Health Care in Appalachia: Perception and Reality.

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2021-10-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0304.10
Michele Morrone, Cory E Cronin, Kristin Schuller, Shannon E Nicks
{"title":"Access to Health Care in Appalachia: Perception and Reality.","authors":"Michele Morrone,&nbsp;Cory E Cronin,&nbsp;Kristin Schuller,&nbsp;Shannon E Nicks","doi":"10.13023/jah.0304.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health disparities such as cancer and diabetes are well documented in Appalachia. These disparities contribute to health status, and by many indicators, Appalachian people are less healthy than those who live in other parts of the country. Access to health care is one factor that contributes to health disparities. Access to care is complex and involves both intrinsic and extrinsic aspects, including satisfaction with quality of care. This research sought to compare Appalachian to non-Appalachian communities in terms of perceptions of access to care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a statewide survey to quantify perceptions of multiple components of access to care, including satisfaction with quality of care. We compared survey results to quantitative data from the County Health Rankings to document consistency with perceptions of access to care. We used chi-square analysis to compare Appalachian with non-Appalachian respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 600 people completed the survey. Results of the survey identify significant differences between Appalachian and non-Appalachian residents' perceptions of access to care and their satisfaction with health care. Specifically, Appalachian residents are less satisfied with convenience, information, quality, and courtesy of health care. They perceive providers relying on stereotypes when communicating with patients.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Examining and documenting perceptions of health care is important because it could lead to improving access by focusing on cultural competency in addition to more resource intensive strategies. Health disparities in Appalachia might be minimized by being more compassionate and understanding of people who live here.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"3 4","pages":"123-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0304.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health disparities such as cancer and diabetes are well documented in Appalachia. These disparities contribute to health status, and by many indicators, Appalachian people are less healthy than those who live in other parts of the country. Access to health care is one factor that contributes to health disparities. Access to care is complex and involves both intrinsic and extrinsic aspects, including satisfaction with quality of care. This research sought to compare Appalachian to non-Appalachian communities in terms of perceptions of access to care.

Methods: We implemented a statewide survey to quantify perceptions of multiple components of access to care, including satisfaction with quality of care. We compared survey results to quantitative data from the County Health Rankings to document consistency with perceptions of access to care. We used chi-square analysis to compare Appalachian with non-Appalachian respondents.

Results: More than 600 people completed the survey. Results of the survey identify significant differences between Appalachian and non-Appalachian residents' perceptions of access to care and their satisfaction with health care. Specifically, Appalachian residents are less satisfied with convenience, information, quality, and courtesy of health care. They perceive providers relying on stereotypes when communicating with patients.

Implications: Examining and documenting perceptions of health care is important because it could lead to improving access by focusing on cultural competency in addition to more resource intensive strategies. Health disparities in Appalachia might be minimized by being more compassionate and understanding of people who live here.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿巴拉契亚获得医疗保健:感知与现实。
在阿巴拉契亚,癌症和糖尿病等健康差异有很好的记录。这些差异影响健康状况,从许多指标来看,阿巴拉契亚人的健康状况不如生活在该国其他地区的人。获得保健服务是造成健康差距的一个因素。获得护理是复杂的,涉及内在和外在两个方面,包括对护理质量的满意度。这项研究试图比较阿巴拉契亚社区和非阿巴拉契亚社区在获得医疗服务方面的看法。方法:我们实施了一项全州范围的调查,以量化对获得护理的多个组成部分的看法,包括对护理质量的满意度。我们将调查结果与县健康排名的定量数据进行了比较,以记录对获得护理的看法的一致性。我们使用卡方分析比较阿巴拉契亚人和非阿巴拉契亚人的受访者。结果:超过600人完成了调查。调查结果表明,阿巴拉契亚居民和非阿巴拉契亚居民对获得医疗服务的看法及其对医疗服务的满意度存在显著差异。具体而言,阿巴拉契亚居民对医疗保健的便利性、信息、质量和礼貌程度较不满意。他们认为医疗服务提供者在与患者沟通时依赖于刻板印象。影响:检查和记录对卫生保健的看法很重要,因为除了更多的资源密集型战略外,它还可以通过关注文化能力来改善获取机会。阿巴拉契亚地区的健康差异可能会通过更多的同情和理解生活在这里的人们而最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Chronic Pain Among Adults Diagnosed with Diabetes Residing in Rural Appalachia. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intimate Partner Violence and Child Maltreatment Services in Rural Northwest North Carolina. Nutrition Education Needs and Barriers of Uninsured Clients who Utilize Free Clinics in Western North Carolina. Aftermath: A Word to Appalachia Following Hurricane Helene. Psychosocial Factors, Stress and Sleep Among Rural Appalachian Kentucky Residents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1