Karine Padoin, Thais Camponogara Bohrer, Lucas Galle Ceolin, Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa, Renata Dornelles Morgental
{"title":"Does ultrasonic activation improve the bond strength and root canal filling quality of endodontic sealers?","authors":"Karine Padoin, Thais Camponogara Bohrer, Lucas Galle Ceolin, Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa, Renata Dornelles Morgental","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202204728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasonic activation (UA) of three endodontic sealers on the bond strength to root dentin and root canal filling quality. Ninety six bovine incisors were instrumented and root canal filling was carried out using AH Plus (AP), Sealer Plus (SP), or Sealer Plus BC (BC), with or without UA (n=16/group). Two 1.5-mm slices were obtained from each root third. The first slice was subjected to push-out testing and failure mode analysis, while the second was observed under a stereomicroscope for filling quality assessment. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests (α=0.05). SP showed higher bond strength and fewer voids than BC in the apical third and when root thirds data were pooled. SP also had higher bond strength compared with AH Plus in the apical third. UA improved the bond strength when BC was used but did not affect the filling quality of any sealer. There were no significant differences between the ultrasonically activated sealers regarding bond strength and filling quality. When root thirds were compared, the bond strength was similar along the root, but there was a tendency to worsen filling quality, with more voids, in the apical segment. In conclusion, UA was effective in increasing the bond strength of the calcium silicate-based sealer but did not improve its filling quality. For the epoxy resin-based sealers, these properties were not affected by UA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":" ","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645197/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasonic activation (UA) of three endodontic sealers on the bond strength to root dentin and root canal filling quality. Ninety six bovine incisors were instrumented and root canal filling was carried out using AH Plus (AP), Sealer Plus (SP), or Sealer Plus BC (BC), with or without UA (n=16/group). Two 1.5-mm slices were obtained from each root third. The first slice was subjected to push-out testing and failure mode analysis, while the second was observed under a stereomicroscope for filling quality assessment. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests (α=0.05). SP showed higher bond strength and fewer voids than BC in the apical third and when root thirds data were pooled. SP also had higher bond strength compared with AH Plus in the apical third. UA improved the bond strength when BC was used but did not affect the filling quality of any sealer. There were no significant differences between the ultrasonically activated sealers regarding bond strength and filling quality. When root thirds were compared, the bond strength was similar along the root, but there was a tendency to worsen filling quality, with more voids, in the apical segment. In conclusion, UA was effective in increasing the bond strength of the calcium silicate-based sealer but did not improve its filling quality. For the epoxy resin-based sealers, these properties were not affected by UA.
本研究旨在探讨超声激活(UA)对三种根管密封剂与根本质结合强度及根管充填质量的影响。使用AH Plus (AP)、Sealer Plus (SP)或Sealer Plus BC (BC)进行根管充填,有或没有UA (n=16/组)。每根三分之一取1.5 mm切片2片。第一层进行推出测试和破坏模式分析,第二层在体视显微镜下观察填充质量评估。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis、Mann-Whitney和Friedman检验(α=0.05)。在根尖三分之一和根三分之一数据汇总时,SP比BC表现出更高的结合强度和更少的空隙。SP在根尖三分之一处的结合强度也高于AH Plus。当使用BC时,UA提高了粘结强度,但不影响任何封口剂的填充质量。超声激活封口剂在粘结强度和充填质量方面无显著差异。对比根三分之一时,沿根的粘结强度基本一致,但充填质量有变差的趋势,在根尖段出现较多的空隙。综上所述,UA能有效提高硅酸钙基封口剂的粘结强度,但不能改善其填充质量。对于环氧树脂基密封剂,这些性能不受UA的影响。
期刊介绍:
Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.