Comparison of an Iranian Traditional Massage (Fateh Method) with Physiotherapy and Acupuncture for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.3.163
Parva Namiranian, Mehrdad Karimi, Seyede Zahra Emami Razavi, Ahmad Fateh Garoos, Mohammad Hossein Ayati
{"title":"Comparison of an Iranian Traditional Massage (Fateh Method) with Physiotherapy and Acupuncture for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Parva Namiranian,&nbsp;Mehrdad Karimi,&nbsp;Seyede Zahra Emami Razavi,&nbsp;Ahmad Fateh Garoos,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Ayati","doi":"10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.3.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is currently a major reason for disability worldwide. Therapeutic massage is one of the most popular non-pharmacological methods for managing chronic LBP (CLBP), and the Fateh method is a massage technique based on Iranian Traditional Medicine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study aimed to compare the effects of Fateh massage with those of acupuncture and physiotherapy on relieving pain and disability in CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-four patients with CLBP were categorized into groups that received Fateh massage, acupuncture, or physiotherapy. Each group included 28 randomly assigned patients who completed 10 sessions of therapy. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Roland-Morris disability scores were evaluated at baseline, after intervention, and four weeks later. The findings were analyzed with SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline VAS and Roland-Morris scores of the three study groups did not indicate significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). All three groups showed significant pre-post improvements in both scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At the end of the treatment sessions, the three groups showed no significant difference in the reductions in pain intensity and disability score (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Improvements in disability and pain between the first and third time points were significant in all three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for each group). In addition, the results of massage, physiotherapy, and acupuncture groups were not significantly different (<i>p</i> > 0.05). No adverse events occurred in the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of Fateh massage were comparable to those of acupuncture and physiotherapy in reducing pain and disability in patients with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":46854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.3.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is currently a major reason for disability worldwide. Therapeutic massage is one of the most popular non-pharmacological methods for managing chronic LBP (CLBP), and the Fateh method is a massage technique based on Iranian Traditional Medicine.

Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the effects of Fateh massage with those of acupuncture and physiotherapy on relieving pain and disability in CLBP.

Methods: Eighty-four patients with CLBP were categorized into groups that received Fateh massage, acupuncture, or physiotherapy. Each group included 28 randomly assigned patients who completed 10 sessions of therapy. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Roland-Morris disability scores were evaluated at baseline, after intervention, and four weeks later. The findings were analyzed with SPSS software.

Results: The baseline VAS and Roland-Morris scores of the three study groups did not indicate significant differences (p > 0.05). All three groups showed significant pre-post improvements in both scores (p < 0.05). At the end of the treatment sessions, the three groups showed no significant difference in the reductions in pain intensity and disability score (p > 0.05). Improvements in disability and pain between the first and third time points were significant in all three groups (p < 0.05 for each group). In addition, the results of massage, physiotherapy, and acupuncture groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). No adverse events occurred in the patients.

Conclusion: The effects of Fateh massage were comparable to those of acupuncture and physiotherapy in reducing pain and disability in patients with CLBP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗传统按摩法(Fateh法)与物理疗法和针灸治疗慢性腰痛患者的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:腰痛(LBP)是目前世界范围内致残的主要原因。治疗性按摩是治疗慢性LBP (CLBP)最流行的非药物方法之一,Fateh方法是一种基于伊朗传统医学的按摩技术。目的:本研究旨在比较Fateh按摩与针灸和物理治疗在缓解CLBP疼痛和残疾方面的作用。方法:84例CLBP患者分为三组,分别接受Fateh按摩、针灸和物理治疗。每组包括28名随机分配的患者,他们完成了10个疗程的治疗。在基线、干预后和四周后分别评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和Roland-Morris残疾评分。用SPSS软件对调查结果进行分析。结果:三个研究组的基线VAS评分和Roland-Morris评分差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。三组患者在治疗前后两项评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。治疗结束时,三组患者疼痛强度和残疾评分的降低差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在第一和第三个时间点之间,三组的残疾和疼痛的改善都是显著的(p < 0.05)。此外,按摩组、理疗组和针刺组的疗效差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。患者无不良事件发生。结论:Fateh按摩在减轻CLBP患者疼痛和残疾方面的作用与针灸和物理治疗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine. Manuscripts should fall into one of the categories: topical review, original research paper, brief ... click here for full Aims & Scope The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture for Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia: a Case Report. Electroacupuncture Protocol for Sensory and Motor Function Recovery After Orthognathic Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial. The Transformation of Acupuncture Practice Using Ultrasonography: Expert Opinions. Acupoint Autohemotherapy Alleviates Airway Inflammation in Asthmatic Rats via Upregulating Expression of Hemeoxygenase-1. Auriculotherapy for Labour Pain Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1