Improving physical quality of life with group physical activity in the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder.

Mauro Giovanni Carta, Maria Carolina Hardoy, Alessandra Pilu, Manlio Sorba, Anna Laura Floris, Francesca Ada Mannu, Antonia Baum, Alessandra Cappai, Claudio Velluti, Massimiliano Salvi
{"title":"Improving physical quality of life with group physical activity in the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder.","authors":"Mauro Giovanni Carta,&nbsp;Maria Carolina Hardoy,&nbsp;Alessandra Pilu,&nbsp;Manlio Sorba,&nbsp;Anna Laura Floris,&nbsp;Francesca Ada Mannu,&nbsp;Antonia Baum,&nbsp;Alessandra Cappai,&nbsp;Claudio Velluti,&nbsp;Massimiliano Salvi","doi":"10.1186/1745-0179-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the change in quality of life over 32 weeks in depressed women assuming antidepressant drug with (experimental group) or without (control group) physical exercise from a study which results on objective dimension of outcome were already published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trial with randomized naturalistic control. Patients selected from the clinical activity registries of a Psychiatric University Unit.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>female, between 40 and 60 years, diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorders (MMD, DSM-IV TR) resistant to ongoing treatment.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>diagnosis of psychotic disorders; any contraindications to physical activity. 30 patients (71.4% of the eligible) participated to the study.</p><p><strong>Cases: </strong>10 randomized patients undergoing pharmacological treatment plus physical activity.</p><p><strong>Controls: </strong>20 patients undergoing only pharmacological therapy. Quality of life was measured by means of WHOQOL-Bref.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients that made physical activity had their WHOQOL-Bref physical score improved from T0 to T8, the differences was statistically significant. In the control group WHOQOL-Bref physical remains the same and, consequentially, the difference between T0 and T8 do not reach any statistical significance.The perceived quality of life in the other domains did not change during the treatment in both groups. Thus no other differences were found between and within groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The data presented in the previous paper found that physical activity seems a good adjunctive treatment in the long term management of patients with MDD. These new data indicated that physical activity may also improve the perceived physical quality of life. The dimensions related with social functioning, environment and psychical well being seem do not improved, unexpectedly, during the trial. Two objective dimension not strictly related to the depressive symptoms improved: social functioning and Clinical Global Impression, this discrepancy with a subjective and objective dimension of the well being may supported the Goldberg point of view that subjective quality of life in bipolar and unipolar severe depression patients may not accurately reflect objective functional outcome status, potentially due to diminished insight, demoralization, or altered life expectations over time. It may be that physical activity improve the self perception of physical well being. The physical domains of WHOQOL-Bref inquiry about conditions as sleep, pain, energy, body satisfaction that seems frequently problematic also in remission due to the pharmacotherapy and may be risk factor for relapse/recurrence. Thus physical therapy seems to determinate improvement in depressive aspects not frequently responsive to the drug treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-0179-4-1","citationCount":"121","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the change in quality of life over 32 weeks in depressed women assuming antidepressant drug with (experimental group) or without (control group) physical exercise from a study which results on objective dimension of outcome were already published.

Methods: Trial with randomized naturalistic control. Patients selected from the clinical activity registries of a Psychiatric University Unit.

Inclusion criteria: female, between 40 and 60 years, diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorders (MMD, DSM-IV TR) resistant to ongoing treatment.

Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of psychotic disorders; any contraindications to physical activity. 30 patients (71.4% of the eligible) participated to the study.

Cases: 10 randomized patients undergoing pharmacological treatment plus physical activity.

Controls: 20 patients undergoing only pharmacological therapy. Quality of life was measured by means of WHOQOL-Bref.

Results: The patients that made physical activity had their WHOQOL-Bref physical score improved from T0 to T8, the differences was statistically significant. In the control group WHOQOL-Bref physical remains the same and, consequentially, the difference between T0 and T8 do not reach any statistical significance.The perceived quality of life in the other domains did not change during the treatment in both groups. Thus no other differences were found between and within groups.

Discussion and conclusion: The data presented in the previous paper found that physical activity seems a good adjunctive treatment in the long term management of patients with MDD. These new data indicated that physical activity may also improve the perceived physical quality of life. The dimensions related with social functioning, environment and psychical well being seem do not improved, unexpectedly, during the trial. Two objective dimension not strictly related to the depressive symptoms improved: social functioning and Clinical Global Impression, this discrepancy with a subjective and objective dimension of the well being may supported the Goldberg point of view that subjective quality of life in bipolar and unipolar severe depression patients may not accurately reflect objective functional outcome status, potentially due to diminished insight, demoralization, or altered life expectations over time. It may be that physical activity improve the self perception of physical well being. The physical domains of WHOQOL-Bref inquiry about conditions as sleep, pain, energy, body satisfaction that seems frequently problematic also in remission due to the pharmacotherapy and may be risk factor for relapse/recurrence. Thus physical therapy seems to determinate improvement in depressive aspects not frequently responsive to the drug treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团体体育活动在重度抑郁症辅助治疗中改善身体生活质量。
背景:本研究的目的是比较服用抗抑郁药物(实验组)和不进行体育锻炼(对照组)的抑郁症妇女在32周内生活质量的变化,该研究结果的客观维度已经发表。方法:随机自然对照试验。从精神科大学的临床活动登记处挑选的患者。纳入标准:女性,年龄在40 - 60岁之间,诊断为对持续治疗有抵抗力的重度抑郁症(MMD, DSM-IV TR)。排除标准:诊断为精神障碍;身体活动的禁忌症。30例患者(71.4%)参加了研究。病例:随机选取10例患者,接受药物治疗加体育锻炼。对照组:20例患者仅接受药物治疗。采用WHOQOL-Bref量表测定生活质量。结果:进行体力活动的患者WHOQOL-Bref体力评分由T0提高至T8,差异有统计学意义。对照组WHOQOL-Bref physical不变,因此T0与T8之间的差异无统计学意义。在治疗期间,两组在其他领域的感知生活质量没有改变。因此,各组之间和组内没有发现其他差异。讨论与结论:先前论文的数据显示,体育锻炼似乎是长期治疗重度抑郁症患者的一种很好的辅助治疗方法。这些新数据表明,体育活动也可能改善人们对生活质量的感知。出乎意料的是,在试验期间,与社会功能、环境和心理健康相关的维度似乎没有得到改善。两个与抑郁症状没有严格关系的客观维度:社会功能和临床整体印象,这种与幸福感的主观和客观维度的差异可能支持Goldberg的观点,即双相和单相严重抑郁症患者的主观生活质量可能不能准确反映客观功能结果状态,这可能是由于随着时间的推移洞察力下降、士气低落或生活期望改变所致。可能是体育活动提高了身体健康的自我感知。whoqol - brief查询的身体领域,如睡眠、疼痛、能量、身体满意度等似乎经常出现问题的情况,也因药物治疗而缓解,可能是复发/复发的危险因素。因此,物理治疗似乎决定了抑郁方面的改善,而不经常对药物治疗有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Are Nurses Working in Mental Health in a Time of Changing Approaches More Exposed to Stress than other Professionals? Job Satisfaction and Perception of Respect for the Rights of Users in Seven Different Countries Worldwide. Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms Prevalence among Medical Students in Four Major Universities, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pharmacogenetic Testing in Treatment-resistant Panic Disorder: a Preliminary Analysis. Exploring Mental Health Issues and Priorities in Indonesia Through Qualitative Expert Consensus. Factors Associated with Stress among Healthcare Personnel after COVID-19 in Northeast Thailand: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1