Plant vs. kidney: Evaluating nephrotoxicity of botanicals with the latest toxicological tools

IF 6.1 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Current Opinion in Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cotox.2022.100371
Adam Pearson , Stefan Gafner , Cynthia V. Rider , Michelle R. Embry , Stephen S. Ferguson , Constance A. Mitchell
{"title":"Plant vs. kidney: Evaluating nephrotoxicity of botanicals with the latest toxicological tools","authors":"Adam Pearson ,&nbsp;Stefan Gafner ,&nbsp;Cynthia V. Rider ,&nbsp;Michelle R. Embry ,&nbsp;Stephen S. Ferguson ,&nbsp;Constance A. Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2022.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Botanicals can cause nephrotoxicity via numerous mechanisms, including disrupting renal blood flow, damaging compartments along the nephron, and obstructing urinary flow. While uncommon, there are various reports of botanical-induced nephrotoxicity in the literature, such as from aristolochia (<em>Aristolochia spp.)</em> and rhubarb (<em>Rheum spp</em>.). However, at present, it is a challenge to assess the toxic potential of botanicals because their chemical composition is variable due to factors such as growing conditions and extraction techniques. Therefore, selecting a single representative sample for an <em>in vivo</em> study is difficult. Given the increasing use of botanicals as dietary supplements and herbal medicine, new approach methodologies (NAMs) are needed to evaluate the potential for renal toxicity to ensure public safety. Such approaches include <em>in vitro</em> models that use layers of physiological complexity to emulate the <em>in vivo</em> microenvironment, enhance the functional viability and differentiation of cell cultures, and improve sensitivity to nephrotoxic insults. Furthermore, computational tools such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can add confidence to these tools by simulating absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The development and implementation of NAMs for renal toxicity testing will allow specific mechanistic data to be generated, leading to a better understanding of the nephrotoxic potential of botanicals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202022000547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botanicals can cause nephrotoxicity via numerous mechanisms, including disrupting renal blood flow, damaging compartments along the nephron, and obstructing urinary flow. While uncommon, there are various reports of botanical-induced nephrotoxicity in the literature, such as from aristolochia (Aristolochia spp.) and rhubarb (Rheum spp.). However, at present, it is a challenge to assess the toxic potential of botanicals because their chemical composition is variable due to factors such as growing conditions and extraction techniques. Therefore, selecting a single representative sample for an in vivo study is difficult. Given the increasing use of botanicals as dietary supplements and herbal medicine, new approach methodologies (NAMs) are needed to evaluate the potential for renal toxicity to ensure public safety. Such approaches include in vitro models that use layers of physiological complexity to emulate the in vivo microenvironment, enhance the functional viability and differentiation of cell cultures, and improve sensitivity to nephrotoxic insults. Furthermore, computational tools such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can add confidence to these tools by simulating absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The development and implementation of NAMs for renal toxicity testing will allow specific mechanistic data to be generated, leading to a better understanding of the nephrotoxic potential of botanicals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物与肾脏:用最新的毒理学工具评估植物药的肾毒性
植物药可通过多种机制引起肾毒性,包括破坏肾血流、破坏肾单位间室和阻碍尿流。虽然不常见,但文献中有各种植物性肾毒性的报道,例如来自马兜铃(马兜铃属)和大黄(大黄属)。然而,目前,评估植物药物的潜在毒性是一个挑战,因为它们的化学成分因生长条件和提取技术等因素而变化。因此,选择一个单一的代表性样本进行体内研究是困难的。鉴于越来越多地使用植物制剂作为膳食补充剂和草药,需要新的方法方法(NAMs)来评估潜在的肾毒性,以确保公共安全。这些方法包括利用生理复杂性层来模拟体内微环境的体外模型,增强细胞培养的功能活力和分化,并提高对肾毒性损伤的敏感性。此外,基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)建模等计算工具可以通过模拟吸收、分布、代谢和排泄来增加这些工具的可信度。肾毒性测试NAMs的开发和实施将允许产生特定的机制数据,从而更好地了解植物药的肾毒性潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixture toxicity: A hot topic in toxicology and chemical risk assessment Editorial: Guardians of Tomorrow: Developmental Toxicology for Future Generations Editorial: Role of the microbiome in toxicology How single-cell transcriptomics provides insight on hepatic responses to TCDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1