Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.

Lampros Vagiotas, Maria Stangou, Efstratios Kasimatis, Aliki Xochelli, Grigorios Myserlis, Georgios Lioulios, Vasiliki Nikolaidou, Manolis Panteli, Konstantinos Ouranos, Nikolaos Antoniadis, Daoudaki Maria, Aikaterini Papagianni, Georgios Tsoulfas, Asimina Fylaktou
{"title":"Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.","authors":"Lampros Vagiotas,&nbsp;Maria Stangou,&nbsp;Efstratios Kasimatis,&nbsp;Aliki Xochelli,&nbsp;Grigorios Myserlis,&nbsp;Georgios Lioulios,&nbsp;Vasiliki Nikolaidou,&nbsp;Manolis Panteli,&nbsp;Konstantinos Ouranos,&nbsp;Nikolaos Antoniadis,&nbsp;Daoudaki Maria,&nbsp;Aikaterini Papagianni,&nbsp;Georgios Tsoulfas,&nbsp;Asimina Fylaktou","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease is associated with immunological disorders, presented as phenotypic alterations of T lymphocytes. These changes are expected to be restored after a successful renal transplantation; however, additional parameters may contribute to this process.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of positive panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) on the restoration of T cell phenotype, after renal transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CD4CD28null, CD8CD28null, natural killer cells (NKs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were estimated by flow cytometry at T0, T3, and T6 which were the time of transplantation, and 3- and 6-mo follow-up, respectively. Changes were esti mated regarding the presence or absence of PRAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were classified in two groups: PRA(-) (<i>n</i> = 43) and PRA(+) (<i>n</i> = 28) groups. Lymphocyte and their subtypes were similar between the two groups at T0, whereas their percentage was increased at T3 in PRA(-) compared to PRA(+) [23 (10.9-47.9) <i>vs</i> 16.4 (7.5-36.8 μ/L, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.03]. Lymphocyte changes in PRA(-) patients included a significant increase in CD4 cells (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), CD8 cells (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and Tregs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and a reduction of NKs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). PRA(+) patients showed an increase in CD4 (<i>P</i> = 0.008) and CD8 (<i>P</i> = 0.0001), and a reduction in NKs (<i>P</i> = 0.07). CD4CD28null and CD8CD28null cells, although initially reduced in both groups, were stabilized thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study described important differences in the immune response between PRA(+) and PRA(-) patients with changes in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subpopulations. PRA(+) patients seemed to have a worse immune profile after 6 mo follow-up, regardless of renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":68893,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","volume":"12 10","pages":"313-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/69/WJT-12-313.PMC9614585.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease is associated with immunological disorders, presented as phenotypic alterations of T lymphocytes. These changes are expected to be restored after a successful renal transplantation; however, additional parameters may contribute to this process.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of positive panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) on the restoration of T cell phenotype, after renal transplantation.

Methods: CD4CD28null, CD8CD28null, natural killer cells (NKs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were estimated by flow cytometry at T0, T3, and T6 which were the time of transplantation, and 3- and 6-mo follow-up, respectively. Changes were esti mated regarding the presence or absence of PRAs.

Results: Patients were classified in two groups: PRA(-) (n = 43) and PRA(+) (n = 28) groups. Lymphocyte and their subtypes were similar between the two groups at T0, whereas their percentage was increased at T3 in PRA(-) compared to PRA(+) [23 (10.9-47.9) vs 16.4 (7.5-36.8 μ/L, respectively; P = 0.03]. Lymphocyte changes in PRA(-) patients included a significant increase in CD4 cells (P < 0.0001), CD8 cells (P < 0.0001), and Tregs (P < 0.0001), and a reduction of NKs (P < 0.0001). PRA(+) patients showed an increase in CD4 (P = 0.008) and CD8 (P = 0.0001), and a reduction in NKs (P = 0.07). CD4CD28null and CD8CD28null cells, although initially reduced in both groups, were stabilized thereafter.

Conclusion: Our study described important differences in the immune response between PRA(+) and PRA(-) patients with changes in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subpopulations. PRA(+) patients seemed to have a worse immune profile after 6 mo follow-up, regardless of renal function.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整体反应性抗体对肾移植后T细胞免疫恢复的影响。
背景:慢性肾脏疾病与免疫紊乱有关,表现为T淋巴细胞的表型改变。这些变化有望在肾移植成功后恢复;然而,其他参数可能有助于这一过程。目的:探讨阳性反应性抗体(positive panel reactive antibodies, PRAs)对肾移植后T细胞表型恢复的影响。方法:采用流式细胞术分别在移植时间T0、T3、T6及随访3、6个月时检测CD4CD28null、CD8CD28null、自然杀伤细胞(NKs)和调节性T细胞(Tregs)。评估了关于pra存在与否的变化。结果:患者分为两组:PRA(-)组(n = 43)和PRA(+)组(n = 28)。两组在T0时淋巴细胞及其亚型基本相同,而在T3时PRA(-)的淋巴细胞及其亚型百分比分别高于PRA(+)[23(10.9-47.9)和16.4 (7.5-36.8)μ/L];P = 0.03]。PRA(-)患者淋巴细胞变化包括CD4细胞(P < 0.0001)、CD8细胞(P < 0.0001)和Tregs细胞(P < 0.0001)显著升高,NKs细胞减少(P < 0.0001)。PRA(+)患者CD4 (P = 0.008)和CD8 (P = 0.0001)升高,NKs降低(P = 0.07)。CD4CD28null和CD8CD28null细胞虽然在两组中最初减少,但此后稳定。结论:我们的研究描述了PRA(+)和PRA(-)患者在淋巴细胞和淋巴细胞亚群变化方面的免疫应答的重要差异。无论肾功能如何,PRA(+)患者在随访6个月后似乎有更差的免疫状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
364
期刊最新文献
Cardiac evaluation of renal transplant candidates with heart failure. Clinical use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation. Ethical frontiers in liver transplantation. Evolution of liver transplantation in the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease era: Tracking impact through time. Imaging-based prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after microwave ablation as bridge therapy: A glimpse into the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1