Living Arrangement of Older Adults and its Effect on Five-Year Survival.

Current Health Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.48.02.07
Ali Bijani, Nikta Neghabi, Seyed Reza Hosseini, Reza Ghadimi, Simin Mouodi
{"title":"Living Arrangement of Older Adults and its Effect on Five-Year Survival.","authors":"Ali Bijani, Nikta Neghabi, Seyed Reza Hosseini, Reza Ghadimi, Simin Mouodi","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.48.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the impact of living alone on health outcomes, this study was conducted to assess the living arrangement of senior adults and its effect on the mortality.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cohort study carried out on elderly people aged 60 years and over. Demographic characteristics, the number of comorbid disorders and living condition-as being alone or living with other people-were collected. The mini-mental state examination questionnaire, the geriatric depression scale, the Katz index of activities of daily living, the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale, and a modified version of Duke social support index were used for data collection. The participants were followed for five years, and their survival was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 500 examined individuals, 100 (20.0%) were living alone. During 5 years of follow-up, sixteen (19.8%) of the people who died were living alone. The adjusted effect of age (P<0.001), male gender (P=0.004), the number of comorbidities (P=0.031), the person's social support (P=0.028) and dependence to others to do complex daily activities (P=0.020) on the mortality of the participants was significant, however, other factors including living alone, illiteracy, cognitive impairment and depression did not show such a statistically significant effect (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Living arrangement, itself, did not show a significant effect on the mortality of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10938,"journal":{"name":"Current Health Sciences Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Health Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.48.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Given the impact of living alone on health outcomes, this study was conducted to assess the living arrangement of senior adults and its effect on the mortality.

Material and methods: This cohort study carried out on elderly people aged 60 years and over. Demographic characteristics, the number of comorbid disorders and living condition-as being alone or living with other people-were collected. The mini-mental state examination questionnaire, the geriatric depression scale, the Katz index of activities of daily living, the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale, and a modified version of Duke social support index were used for data collection. The participants were followed for five years, and their survival was assessed.

Results: Out of the 500 examined individuals, 100 (20.0%) were living alone. During 5 years of follow-up, sixteen (19.8%) of the people who died were living alone. The adjusted effect of age (P<0.001), male gender (P=0.004), the number of comorbidities (P=0.031), the person's social support (P=0.028) and dependence to others to do complex daily activities (P=0.020) on the mortality of the participants was significant, however, other factors including living alone, illiteracy, cognitive impairment and depression did not show such a statistically significant effect (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Living arrangement, itself, did not show a significant effect on the mortality of older adults.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人的生活安排及其对五年存活率的影响。
导言鉴于独居对健康状况的影响,本研究旨在评估老年人的居住安排及其对死亡率的影响:这项队列研究的对象是 60 岁及以上的老年人。收集了人口统计学特征、合并症数量和居住条件(独居或与他人同住)。数据收集采用了小型精神状态检查问卷、老年抑郁量表、卡茨日常生活活动指数、劳顿日常生活工具活动量表和杜克社会支持指数的修订版。对参与者进行了为期五年的随访,并评估了他们的存活率:在 500 名受试者中,有 100 人(20.0%)独居。在 5 年的跟踪调查中,16 名死亡者(19.8%)为独居。年龄的调整效应(P0.05):结论:居住安排本身对老年人的死亡率没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HOSPITAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT IN HEALTHCARE SECTOR: A REVIEW HOUSEHOLD COPING STRATEGIES FOR DELIVERY CARE COSTS: FINDINGS FROM A RURAL DISTRICT OF PAKISTAN DIFFICULTY IN USABILITY OF ELECTRONIC PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS FOR AN UNDERSERVED ELDERLY ADULT POPULATION A PROFILE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATY PATIENTS RECEIVING GREEN LASER FROM 2015 TO 2019 IN D.I.KHAN DIVISION, PAKISTAN RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB EMBEDDEDNESS, ETHICAL CLIMATE WITH NURSES’ TURNOVER: THE MODERATING ROLE OF LOCUS OF CONTROL AND PERCEIVED EMPLOYMENT ALTERNATIVES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1