Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.
Margaret Nolan, Deejay Zwaga, Danielle McCarthy, Christian Kastman, Timothy Baker, Mark Zehner, Stevens Smith, Michael Fiore
{"title":"Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.","authors":"Margaret Nolan, Deejay Zwaga, Danielle McCarthy, Christian Kastman, Timothy Baker, Mark Zehner, Stevens Smith, Michael Fiore","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2020.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) \"cold-called\" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"15 4","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2020.21","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2020.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.
Aims: To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.
Methods: Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) "cold-called" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.
Results: Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).
Conclusions: A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.
大多数烟草治疗工作的目标是医疗保健机构,因为在美国,每年约有75%的吸烟者去初级保健提供者那里。然而,25%的患者可能会被这种靶向治疗遗漏。目的:描述吸烟但不经常访问初级保健的患者——他们的特征、电话联系成功率和接受烟草治疗的程度。方法:戒烟外展专家(TCOS)在过去的一年里,那些没有去初级保健诊所就诊的人被“推销”,提供烟草依赖治疗。报告了年龄、性别、保险状况、种族、民族、EHR患者门户状态和推广结果。结果:在卫生系统登记的3407例吸烟者中,565例(16.6%)在过去一年中没有见过任何初级保健提供者。在271个电话中,有143个(53%)成功接通,33个(23%)设定了戒烟日期。那些没有去看医生的人往往是更年轻的男性,他们每天吸烟,而不是每天吸烟(42岁对44岁)。, p = 0.004;48% vs. 40%女性,p=0.0002, 21% vs. 27%某天,p=0.003),并且在EHR患者门户较少活跃(33% vs. 40%, p= 0.001)。结论:相当大比例的吸烟患者被传统的烟草治疗干预措施遗漏,需要初级保健访问,但许多人接受戒烟治疗提供。