Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.

IF 1.2 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-03 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2020.21
Margaret Nolan, Deejay Zwaga, Danielle McCarthy, Christian Kastman, Timothy Baker, Mark Zehner, Stevens Smith, Michael Fiore
{"title":"Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.","authors":"Margaret Nolan,&nbsp;Deejay Zwaga,&nbsp;Danielle McCarthy,&nbsp;Christian Kastman,&nbsp;Timothy Baker,&nbsp;Mark Zehner,&nbsp;Stevens Smith,&nbsp;Michael Fiore","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2020.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) \"cold-called\" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"15 4","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2020.21","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2020.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.

Aims: To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.

Methods: Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) "cold-called" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.

Results: Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).

Conclusions: A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于电子病历的戒烟治疗遗漏了哪些人?吸烟和不定期到初级保健诊所就诊的患者的描述性研究。
大多数烟草治疗工作的目标是医疗保健机构,因为在美国,每年约有75%的吸烟者去初级保健提供者那里。然而,25%的患者可能会被这种靶向治疗遗漏。目的:描述吸烟但不经常访问初级保健的患者——他们的特征、电话联系成功率和接受烟草治疗的程度。方法:戒烟外展专家(TCOS)在过去的一年里,那些没有去初级保健诊所就诊的人被“推销”,提供烟草依赖治疗。报告了年龄、性别、保险状况、种族、民族、EHR患者门户状态和推广结果。结果:在卫生系统登记的3407例吸烟者中,565例(16.6%)在过去一年中没有见过任何初级保健提供者。在271个电话中,有143个(53%)成功接通,33个(23%)设定了戒烟日期。那些没有去看医生的人往往是更年轻的男性,他们每天吸烟,而不是每天吸烟(42岁对44岁)。, p = 0.004;48% vs. 40%女性,p=0.0002, 21% vs. 27%某天,p=0.003),并且在EHR患者门户较少活跃(33% vs. 40%, p= 0.001)。结论:相当大比例的吸烟患者被传统的烟草治疗干预措施遗漏,需要初级保健访问,但许多人接受戒烟治疗提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. Integrating the "Quit and Stay Quit Monday" Model into Smoking Cessation Services for Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1