Improving knowledge, attitude, and practices of complementary feeding using practical intervention training for parents living in central Lombok, Indonesia: A community-based study.

Jeslyn Tengkawan, Ayu Anandhika Septisari, Zulfikar Ihyauddin, Titi Pambudi Karuniawaty, Lina Nurbaiti, Nurhandini Eka Dewi, Rini Sekartini
{"title":"Improving knowledge, attitude, and practices of complementary feeding using practical intervention training for parents living in central Lombok, Indonesia: A community-based study.","authors":"Jeslyn Tengkawan,&nbsp;Ayu Anandhika Septisari,&nbsp;Zulfikar Ihyauddin,&nbsp;Titi Pambudi Karuniawaty,&nbsp;Lina Nurbaiti,&nbsp;Nurhandini Eka Dewi,&nbsp;Rini Sekartini","doi":"10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_336_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stunting remains a major public health concern in Indonesia despite many interventions. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of interventions in the form of education and demonstration on preparing complementary feeding (CF) to increase knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of CF among parents living in villages with high stunting prevalence in Central Lombok, Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a quasi-experimental community-based study, conducted from June to August 2019. Three villages were divided into three groups, i.e., control group (CG), education alone (EA) group, and education-cum-demonstration (ED) group. We assessed KAP before and after intervention with a 4-week interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 participants were enrolled in this study, consisting of 67, 70, and 68 participants in the CG, EA, and ED groups, respectively. In within-group analysis, parents' attitudes (P = 0.015) and practices (P = 0.014) improved in the ED group while only parents' practices (P = 0.034) improved in the EA group. In between-group analysis, parental attitude (P = 0.039) and practices (P = 0.008) improved in the ED group when compared to the CG. In the EA group, only parents' practices improved when compared to the CG (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in KAP score in the EA and ED groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combined approach of education and demonstration works better to promote healthy CF practices among mothers.</p>","PeriodicalId":37393,"journal":{"name":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_336_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stunting remains a major public health concern in Indonesia despite many interventions. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of interventions in the form of education and demonstration on preparing complementary feeding (CF) to increase knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of CF among parents living in villages with high stunting prevalence in Central Lombok, Indonesia.

Materials and methods: This is a quasi-experimental community-based study, conducted from June to August 2019. Three villages were divided into three groups, i.e., control group (CG), education alone (EA) group, and education-cum-demonstration (ED) group. We assessed KAP before and after intervention with a 4-week interval.

Results: A total of 205 participants were enrolled in this study, consisting of 67, 70, and 68 participants in the CG, EA, and ED groups, respectively. In within-group analysis, parents' attitudes (P = 0.015) and practices (P = 0.014) improved in the ED group while only parents' practices (P = 0.034) improved in the EA group. In between-group analysis, parental attitude (P = 0.039) and practices (P = 0.008) improved in the ED group when compared to the CG. In the EA group, only parents' practices improved when compared to the CG (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in KAP score in the EA and ED groups.

Conclusion: A combined approach of education and demonstration works better to promote healthy CF practices among mothers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚龙目岛中部,一项基于社区的研究:利用实际干预培训改善父母补充喂养的知识、态度和做法。
背景:尽管采取了许多干预措施,但发育迟缓仍然是印度尼西亚一个主要的公共卫生问题。本研究旨在评估以教育和示范形式进行的干预措施的有效性,以准备补充喂养(CF),以提高生活在印度尼西亚龙目岛中部发育不良发生率高的村庄的父母对补充喂养的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。材料与方法:这是一项基于社区的准实验研究,于2019年6月至8月进行。将3个村分为对照组(CG)、单纯教育组(EA)和教育+示范组(ED) 3组。我们以4周的间隔评估干预前后的KAP。结果:本研究共纳入205名受试者,其中CG组、EA组和ED组分别为67名、70名和68名。在组内分析中,ED组家长的态度(P = 0.015)和实践(P = 0.014)有所改善,而EA组只有家长的实践(P = 0.034)有所改善。在组间分析中,ED组的父母态度(P = 0.039)和行为(P = 0.008)比CG组有所改善。在EA组中,只有父母的做法与CG相比有所改善(P = 0.006)。EA组与ED组KAP评分差异无统计学意义。结论:教育和示范相结合的方法可以更好地在母亲中推广健康的CF做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Public Health, Epidemiology, primary health care, epidemiology, health administration, health systems, health economics, health promotion, public health nutrition, communicable and non-communicable diseases, maternal and child health, occupational and environmental health, social and preventive medicine. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
"OpenWHO" SEARO NCD PEN-HEARTS Courses: Training 10000 Health Care Providers in 100 Countries in 100 Days. Locating "Community" in Antimicrobial Resistance Governance. Managing Health-care Workers and Strengthening Our Infrastructure. Perception and Disposal Practices of Toddler Feces by Mothers in Suburban Area of Kendari, Indonesia. Prevalence of Current Areca Nut Use and Its Associated Factors among Bhutanese Aged 15-69 Years: Analysis of the Nationally Representative STEPS Survey 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1