Visual-spatial training in patients with sub-acute stroke without neglect: a randomized, single-blind controlled trial.

Q2 Medicine Functional neurology Pub Date : 2019-01-01
M Tramontano, D Dell'Uomo, A M Cinnera, C Luciani, C Di Lorenzo, M Marcotulli, F Vona, A Mercuro, S Abbruzzese
{"title":"Visual-spatial training in patients with sub-acute stroke without neglect: a randomized, single-blind controlled trial.","authors":"M Tramontano,&nbsp;D Dell'Uomo,&nbsp;A M Cinnera,&nbsp;C Luciani,&nbsp;C Di Lorenzo,&nbsp;M Marcotulli,&nbsp;F Vona,&nbsp;A Mercuro,&nbsp;S Abbruzzese","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many people who have suffered a stroke will experience sensorimotor impairments that disrupt their performance of motor skills, including balance and gait. Furthermore, stroke-induced brain damage can Result in visual disorders that may significantly impact performance of normal daily activities. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects, on balance, of visual-spatial training as an add-on intervention to conventional neurorehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke without neglect; secondarily, it aimed to assess the effects of this training on activities of daily living. Thirty inpatients (17 M, age: 57.3±12.9 years) with a diagnosis of subacute stroke (< 180 days) were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups: the visual-spatial training group and a control group. All patients were evaluated, using the Tinetti Balance and Gait Scale (TBG), the Berg Balance Scale, computerized posturography, and the Barthel Index (BI), both before (T0) and after (T1) four weeks of training sessions. In addition to conventional neurorehabilitation, each group performed a total of twelve 20-minute rehabilitation sessions (3 times/week for 4 weeks). Significant TIME x GROUP interactions were recorded in the experimental group with respect to the control group for the TBG score [F (1,18) =15.59; p = 0.0004] and BI score [F (1,28) =6.35; p = 0.01]. Both groups recorded non-significant improvements on the instrumental postural assessment. These data suggest that visualspatial training as an add-on intervention to conventional neurorehabilitation could be an effective complementary strategy to improve balance and activities of daily living.</p>","PeriodicalId":12560,"journal":{"name":"Functional neurology","volume":"34 1","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many people who have suffered a stroke will experience sensorimotor impairments that disrupt their performance of motor skills, including balance and gait. Furthermore, stroke-induced brain damage can Result in visual disorders that may significantly impact performance of normal daily activities. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects, on balance, of visual-spatial training as an add-on intervention to conventional neurorehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke without neglect; secondarily, it aimed to assess the effects of this training on activities of daily living. Thirty inpatients (17 M, age: 57.3±12.9 years) with a diagnosis of subacute stroke (< 180 days) were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups: the visual-spatial training group and a control group. All patients were evaluated, using the Tinetti Balance and Gait Scale (TBG), the Berg Balance Scale, computerized posturography, and the Barthel Index (BI), both before (T0) and after (T1) four weeks of training sessions. In addition to conventional neurorehabilitation, each group performed a total of twelve 20-minute rehabilitation sessions (3 times/week for 4 weeks). Significant TIME x GROUP interactions were recorded in the experimental group with respect to the control group for the TBG score [F (1,18) =15.59; p = 0.0004] and BI score [F (1,28) =6.35; p = 0.01]. Both groups recorded non-significant improvements on the instrumental postural assessment. These data suggest that visualspatial training as an add-on intervention to conventional neurorehabilitation could be an effective complementary strategy to improve balance and activities of daily living.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚急性卒中患者的视觉空间训练:一项随机、单盲对照试验。
许多中风患者会经历感觉运动障碍,影响他们的运动技能,包括平衡和步态。此外,中风引起的脑损伤可导致视觉障碍,这可能会严重影响正常日常活动的表现。本研究的主要目的是探讨视觉空间训练作为常规神经康复治疗的辅助干预对亚急性卒中患者平衡性的影响。其次,它旨在评估这种培训对日常生活活动的影响。本研究将30例诊断为亚急性脑卒中(< 180天)的住院患者(17岁,年龄:57.3±12.9岁)随机分为两组:视觉空间训练组和对照组。所有患者在训练前(T0)和训练后(T1)进行评估,使用Tinetti平衡和步态量表(TBG), Berg平衡量表,计算机姿势照相和Barthel指数(BI)。除常规神经康复外,每组共进行12次20分钟的康复疗程(3次/周,持续4周)。实验组的TBG评分与对照组相比记录显著时间x组交互作用[F (1,18) =15.59;p = 0.0004], BI评分[F (1,28) =6.35;P = 0.01]。两组在仪器姿势评估上均无显著改善。这些数据表明,视觉空间训练作为传统神经康复的附加干预可能是改善平衡和日常生活活动的有效补充策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Functional neurology
Functional neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Barthel Index in patients with Parkinson's disease: a reliability and validity study. Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on upper limb activity according to a bi-dimensional kinematic analysis in progressive multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized single-blind pilot study. Does a single bout of exercise impacts BDNF, oxidative stress and epigenetic markers in spinal cord injury patients? Acute ischemic stroke management in Lebanon: obstacles and solutions. Neurophysiological changes after cognitive-motor tasks in Parkinson's disease patients with deep brain stimulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1