Impaired coronary flow reserve in patients with poor type 2 diabetes control: Preliminary results from prospective microvascular dysfunction registry.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-07 DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2022.0100
Łukasz Niewiara, Paweł Kleczyński, Bartłomiej Guzik, Piotr Szolc, Jakub Baran, Jakub Podolec, Marta Diachyshyn, Krzysztof Żmudka, Jacek Legutko
{"title":"Impaired coronary flow reserve in patients with poor type 2 diabetes control: Preliminary results from prospective microvascular dysfunction registry.","authors":"Łukasz Niewiara, Paweł Kleczyński, Bartłomiej Guzik, Piotr Szolc, Jakub Baran, Jakub Podolec, Marta Diachyshyn, Krzysztof Żmudka, Jacek Legutko","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2022.0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (DM) is a common comorbidity associated with cardiovascular disease, especially when poor glucose control is present. Extracardiac microcirculatory complications prevalence is well documented, however coronary microcirculatory dysfunction (CMD) seem to be underreported in this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study analyzed coronary physiology measurements (coronary flow reserve [CFR], index of microcirculatory resistance [IMR], resistance reserve ratio [RRR]) in 47 diabetic patients (21 subjects with poor glycemia control defined as fasting glucose levels > 7.2 mmol/L and 26 with normal fasting glucose), and compared to 54 non-diabetic controls, who had undergone coronary angiography due to symptoms of chronic coronary syndrome. The median age of patients was 65.5 [59.0; 73.0] years old, 74% male, similar in terms of cardiovascular risk factors and prior myocardial infarction. Insulin was used by 19% of diabetic patients with poor glucose control and by 15% of those with DM and low fasting glucose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of CMD was 38% in poor glycemia control patients, 27% in DM-patients with proper glucose control and 31% of non-diabetics. Median CFR values were the lowest in poor DM control patients compared to both, normal fasting glucose (1.75 [1.37; 2.32] vs. 2.30 [1.75; 2.85], p = 0.026) and to non-diabetics (1.75 [1.37; 2.32] vs. 2.15 [1.50; 2.95], p = 0.045). Levels of IMR, RRR and MRR did not differ significantly between compared groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poor glycemia control in type 2 DM might be associated with a higher prevalence of CMD driven by decreased coronary flow reserve, however, further research in larger groups of patients should be performed to confirm this observation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2022.0100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (DM) is a common comorbidity associated with cardiovascular disease, especially when poor glucose control is present. Extracardiac microcirculatory complications prevalence is well documented, however coronary microcirculatory dysfunction (CMD) seem to be underreported in this group.

Methods: The present study analyzed coronary physiology measurements (coronary flow reserve [CFR], index of microcirculatory resistance [IMR], resistance reserve ratio [RRR]) in 47 diabetic patients (21 subjects with poor glycemia control defined as fasting glucose levels > 7.2 mmol/L and 26 with normal fasting glucose), and compared to 54 non-diabetic controls, who had undergone coronary angiography due to symptoms of chronic coronary syndrome. The median age of patients was 65.5 [59.0; 73.0] years old, 74% male, similar in terms of cardiovascular risk factors and prior myocardial infarction. Insulin was used by 19% of diabetic patients with poor glucose control and by 15% of those with DM and low fasting glucose.

Results: Prevalence of CMD was 38% in poor glycemia control patients, 27% in DM-patients with proper glucose control and 31% of non-diabetics. Median CFR values were the lowest in poor DM control patients compared to both, normal fasting glucose (1.75 [1.37; 2.32] vs. 2.30 [1.75; 2.85], p = 0.026) and to non-diabetics (1.75 [1.37; 2.32] vs. 2.15 [1.50; 2.95], p = 0.045). Levels of IMR, RRR and MRR did not differ significantly between compared groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

Conclusions: Poor glycemia control in type 2 DM might be associated with a higher prevalence of CMD driven by decreased coronary flow reserve, however, further research in larger groups of patients should be performed to confirm this observation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 型糖尿病控制不佳患者的冠状动脉血流储备受损:前瞻性微血管功能障碍登记的初步结果。
背景:2型糖尿病(DM)是心血管疾病的常见合并症,尤其是在血糖控制不佳的情况下。心外微循环并发症的发病率已得到充分证实,但冠状动脉微循环功能障碍(CMD)在这一群体中似乎报告不足:本研究分析了 47 名糖尿病患者(21 名血糖控制不佳者,定义为空腹血糖水平大于 7.2 mmol/L,26 名空腹血糖正常者)的冠状动脉生理测量指标(冠状动脉血流储备 [CFR]、微循环阻力指数 [IMR]、阻力储备比 [RRR]),并与 54 名非糖尿病对照者进行了比较,这些患者因慢性冠状动脉综合征症状而接受了冠状动脉造影术。患者的中位年龄为 65.5 [59.0; 73.0]岁,74% 为男性,心血管风险因素和既往心肌梗死情况相似。在血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者中,19% 使用胰岛素,在患有糖尿病且空腹血糖较低的患者中,15% 使用胰岛素:血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者中,CMD 患病率为 38%;血糖控制良好的糖尿病患者中,CMD 患病率为 27%;非糖尿病患者中,CMD 患病率为 31%。与空腹血糖正常者(1.75 [1.37; 2.32] vs. 2.30 [1.75; 2.85],p = 0.026)和非糖尿病患者(1.75 [1.37; 2.32] vs. 2.15 [1.50; 2.95],p = 0.045)相比,血糖控制不良的 DM 患者的 CFR 中位值最低。IMR、RRR 和 MRR 的水平在比较组之间没有显著差异(所有比较的 p > 0.05):结论:2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳可能与冠状动脉血流储备下降导致的CMD发病率增高有关,然而,应在更大的患者群体中开展进一步研究,以证实这一观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology journal
Cardiology journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community. Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.
期刊最新文献
Functional tricuspid regurgitation and efficacy of electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial functional mitral regurgitation Repeat cryoablation as a redo procedure for atrial fibrillation ablation: Is it a good choice? Prevalence and prognosis of anxiety, insomnia, and type D personality in patients with myocardial infarction: A Spanish cohort. The importance of blood pressure measurements at the emergency department in detection of arterial hypertension. Left atrial appendage filling defect in exclusive early-phase scanning of dual-phase cardiac computed tomography: An indicator for elevated thromboembolic risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1