Early Initiation of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.

Q2 Health Professions Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1182/ject-79-82
Takeshi Goto, Shinya Yaguchi, Junko Ogasawara, Naotaka Kato, Jin Irie, Hiroaki Ichikawa, Yuki Nishiya, Yoshiya Ishizawa, Osamu Nomura, Hiroyuki Hanada
{"title":"Early Initiation of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Takeshi Goto,&nbsp;Shinya Yaguchi,&nbsp;Junko Ogasawara,&nbsp;Naotaka Kato,&nbsp;Jin Irie,&nbsp;Hiroaki Ichikawa,&nbsp;Yuki Nishiya,&nbsp;Yoshiya Ishizawa,&nbsp;Osamu Nomura,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Hanada","doi":"10.1182/ject-79-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal timing for initiating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after starting mechanical ventilation has yet to be clarified. We report herein the cases of two patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who were successfully managed with an early ECMO induction strategy. Case 1 involved a 64-year-old man admitted in respiratory distress with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19. On day 5 at hospital, he was intubated, but oxygenation remained unimproved despite mechanical ventilation treatment with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> [P/F] ratio, 127; Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction [RESP] score, 4). ECMO was initiated 4 hours after intubation, and stopped on day 16 at hospital. The patient was discharged from hospital on day 36. Case 2 involved a 49-year-old man who had been admitted 8 days prior. He was intubated on hospital on day 2. High PEEP mechanical ventilation did not improve oxygenation (P/F ratio, 93; RESP score, 7). ECMO was stopped on hospital on day 7 and he was discharged from hospital on day 21. The strategy of early initiation of ECMO in these two cases may have minimized the risk of ventilation-related lung injury and contributed to the achievement of favorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","volume":"54 1","pages":"79-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639695/pdf/ject-79-82.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/ject-79-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal timing for initiating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after starting mechanical ventilation has yet to be clarified. We report herein the cases of two patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who were successfully managed with an early ECMO induction strategy. Case 1 involved a 64-year-old man admitted in respiratory distress with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19. On day 5 at hospital, he was intubated, but oxygenation remained unimproved despite mechanical ventilation treatment with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (PaO2/FiO2 [P/F] ratio, 127; Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction [RESP] score, 4). ECMO was initiated 4 hours after intubation, and stopped on day 16 at hospital. The patient was discharged from hospital on day 36. Case 2 involved a 49-year-old man who had been admitted 8 days prior. He was intubated on hospital on day 2. High PEEP mechanical ventilation did not improve oxygenation (P/F ratio, 93; RESP score, 7). ECMO was stopped on hospital on day 7 and he was discharged from hospital on day 21. The strategy of early initiation of ECMO in these two cases may have minimized the risk of ventilation-related lung injury and contributed to the achievement of favorable outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19危重症患者早期开始静脉-静脉体外膜氧合。
启动机械通气后启动体外膜氧合(ECMO)的最佳时机尚未明确。我们在此报告两例冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者,他们通过早期ECMO诱导策略成功治疗。病例1涉及一名64岁男性,因聚合酶链反应确诊COVID-19而出现呼吸窘迫。入院第5天插管,经机械通气治疗,呼气末正压(PaO2/FiO2 [P/F]比,127;呼吸ECMO生存预测[RESP]评分,4)。插管后4小时开始ECMO,第16天在医院停止ECMO。病人于第36天出院。病例2涉及一名8天前入院的49岁男子。他于第二天在医院插管。高PEEP机械通气未改善氧合(P/F比,93;RESP评分,7)。第7天在医院停止ECMO,第21天出院。在这两个病例中,早期开始ECMO的策略可能最小化了通气相关肺损伤的风险,并有助于实现良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracorporeal Technology is dedicated to the study and practice of Basic Science and Clinical issues related to extracorporeal circulation. Areas emphasized in the Journal include: •Cardiopulmonary Bypass •Cardiac Surgery •Cardiovascular Anesthesia •Hematology •Blood Management •Physiology •Fluid Dynamics •Laboratory Science •Coagulation and Hematology •Transfusion •Business Practices •Pediatric Perfusion •Total Quality Management • Evidence-Based Practices
期刊最新文献
First year update as cardiovascular perfusion's open access international journal. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: lifesaving for the right patient, at the right time and in the right place. Central ECMO cannulation for severe dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker overdose. Examining Online International Health Professions Education: A Mixed Methods Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Early Outcomes Building an Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Program at a High-Volume Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1