Investigating COVID-19 Vaccine Communication and Misinformation on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.

IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2022-10-25 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2196/38316
Katherine van Kampen, Jeremi Laski, Gabrielle Herman, Teresa M Chan
{"title":"Investigating COVID-19 Vaccine Communication and Misinformation on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Katherine van Kampen,&nbsp;Jeremi Laski,&nbsp;Gabrielle Herman,&nbsp;Teresa M Chan","doi":"10.2196/38316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for reliable information, especially around vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy is a growing concern and a great threat to broader public health. The prevalence of social media within our daily lives emphasizes the importance of accurately analyzing how health information is being disseminated to the public. TikTok is of particular interest, as it is an emerging social media platform that young adults may be increasingly using to access health information.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine and describe the content within the top 100 TikToks trending with the hashtag #covidvaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 250 most viewed TikToks with the hashtag #covidvaccine were batch downloaded on July 1, 2021, with their respective metadata. Each TikTok was subsequently viewed and encoded by 2 independent reviewers. Coding continued until 100 TikToks could be included based on language and content. Descriptive features were recorded including health care professional (HCP) status of creator, verification of HCP status, genre, and misinformation addressed. Primary inclusion criteria were any TikToks in English with discussion of a COVID-19 vaccine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 102 videos included, the median number of plays was 1,700,000, with median shares of 9224 and 62,200 followers. Upon analysis, 14.7% (15/102) of TikToks included HCPs, of which 80% (12/102) could be verified via social media or regulatory body search; 100% (15/15) of HCP-created TikToks supported vaccine use, and overall, 81.3% (83/102) of all TikToks (created by either a layperson or an HCP) supported vaccine use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the pandemic continues, vaccine hesitancy poses a threat to lifting restrictions, and discovering reasons for this hesitancy is important to public health measures. This study summarizes the discourse around vaccine use on TikTok. Importantly, it opens a frank discussion about the necessity to incorporate new social media platforms into medical education, so we might ensure our trainees are ready to engage with patients on novel platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620417/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for reliable information, especially around vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy is a growing concern and a great threat to broader public health. The prevalence of social media within our daily lives emphasizes the importance of accurately analyzing how health information is being disseminated to the public. TikTok is of particular interest, as it is an emerging social media platform that young adults may be increasingly using to access health information.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine and describe the content within the top 100 TikToks trending with the hashtag #covidvaccine.

Methods: The top 250 most viewed TikToks with the hashtag #covidvaccine were batch downloaded on July 1, 2021, with their respective metadata. Each TikTok was subsequently viewed and encoded by 2 independent reviewers. Coding continued until 100 TikToks could be included based on language and content. Descriptive features were recorded including health care professional (HCP) status of creator, verification of HCP status, genre, and misinformation addressed. Primary inclusion criteria were any TikToks in English with discussion of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Results: Of 102 videos included, the median number of plays was 1,700,000, with median shares of 9224 and 62,200 followers. Upon analysis, 14.7% (15/102) of TikToks included HCPs, of which 80% (12/102) could be verified via social media or regulatory body search; 100% (15/15) of HCP-created TikToks supported vaccine use, and overall, 81.3% (83/102) of all TikToks (created by either a layperson or an HCP) supported vaccine use.

Conclusions: As the pandemic continues, vaccine hesitancy poses a threat to lifting restrictions, and discovering reasons for this hesitancy is important to public health measures. This study summarizes the discourse around vaccine use on TikTok. Importantly, it opens a frank discussion about the necessity to incorporate new social media platforms into medical education, so we might ensure our trainees are ready to engage with patients on novel platforms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查抖音上的COVID-19疫苗传播和错误信息:横断面研究。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了对可靠信息的需求,特别是关于疫苗的信息。疫苗犹豫是一个日益令人担忧的问题,对更广泛的公共卫生构成巨大威胁。社交媒体在我们日常生活中的流行强调了准确分析健康信息如何传播给公众的重要性。TikTok尤其令人感兴趣,因为它是一个新兴的社交媒体平台,年轻人可能越来越多地使用它来获取健康信息。目的:本研究的目的是检查和描述带有#covidvaccine标签的前100名tiktok趋势中的内容。方法:于2021年7月1日批量下载带有#covid - vaccine标签的250个点击量最高的tiktok及其元数据。每个TikTok随后由两名独立审稿人查看和编码。继续编码,直到根据语言和内容可以包含100个tiktok。记录描述性特征,包括卫生保健专业人员(HCP)创建者的状态、HCP状态的验证、类型和错误信息的处理。主要纳入标准是所有讨论COVID-19疫苗的英文tiktok。结果:在纳入的102个视频中,播放数中位数为170万,分享数中位数为9224,粉丝数中位数为6.22万。经分析,14.7%(15/102)的tiktok包含HCPs,其中80%(12/102)可以通过社交媒体或监管机构搜索得到验证;100%(15/15)的HCP创建的tiktok支持疫苗使用,总体而言,81.3%(83/102)的所有tiktok(由外行人或HCP创建)支持疫苗使用。结论:随着大流行的继续,疫苗犹豫对解除限制构成威胁,发现这种犹豫的原因对公共卫生措施很重要。本研究总结了TikTok上关于疫苗使用的讨论。重要的是,它开启了关于将新的社交媒体平台纳入医学教育的必要性的坦率讨论,因此我们可以确保我们的受训者准备好在新颖的平台上与患者接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Natural Language Processing Methods in Reddit to Investigate Opioid Use: Scoping Review. Effects of COVID-19 Illness and Vaccination Infodemic Through Mobile Health, Social Media, and Electronic Media on the Attitudes of Caregivers and Health Care Providers in Pakistan: Qualitative Exploratory Study. Descriptions of Scientific Evidence and Uncertainty of Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in US News: Content Analysis Study. Ethical Considerations in Infodemic Management: Systematic Scoping Review. Large Language Models Can Enable Inductive Thematic Analysis of a Social Media Corpus in a Single Prompt: Human Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1