The adequacy of current diagnostic criteria for making a diagnosis of ABPA.

Sakine Nazik Bahçecioğlu, Murat Türk, Gülden Paçacı Çetin, İnsu Yılmaz
{"title":"The adequacy of current diagnostic criteria for making a diagnosis of ABPA.","authors":"Sakine Nazik Bahçecioğlu,&nbsp;Murat Türk,&nbsp;Gülden Paçacı Çetin,&nbsp;İnsu Yılmaz","doi":"10.5578/tt.20229804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, there are four different diagnostic criteria systems for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA): The Rosenberg-Patterson, Seropositive ABPA (ABPA-S), Central Bronchiectasis and ABPA (ABPA-CB), and the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) ABPA study group criteria. This study aims to retrospectively compare these four diagnostic criteria in ABPA patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of ABPA were retrospectively re-evaluated using these four diagnostic criteria, and the superiority of these criteria to each other was determined.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 10 ABPA patients were included in the study. Seven patients were diagnosed according to ISHAM ABPA study group diagnostic criteria and six patients according to the Rosenberg-Patterson diagnostic criteria. None of the patients fulfilled the criteria when evaluated individually with ABPA-S and ABPA-CB. Of patients diagnosed by ISHAM, five had a total IgE level above 1000 IU/mL and two had below 1000 IU/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated that the diagnostic criteria developed by the ISHAM ABPA study group were superior to the others in diagnosing ABPA in cases with a total IgE level above 1000 IU/mL. However, all these criteria seem to be sufficient to diagnose ABPA in patients with a total IgE below 1000 IU/mL. We believe the necessity to demonstrate presence of Aspergillus fumigatus precipitating antibodies or specific IgG positivity should be questioned particularly in patients with radiologic findings compatible with ABPA and a total IgE level below 1000 IU/mL.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"70 2","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20229804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, there are four different diagnostic criteria systems for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA): The Rosenberg-Patterson, Seropositive ABPA (ABPA-S), Central Bronchiectasis and ABPA (ABPA-CB), and the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) ABPA study group criteria. This study aims to retrospectively compare these four diagnostic criteria in ABPA patients.

Materials and methods: Patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of ABPA were retrospectively re-evaluated using these four diagnostic criteria, and the superiority of these criteria to each other was determined.

Result: A total of 10 ABPA patients were included in the study. Seven patients were diagnosed according to ISHAM ABPA study group diagnostic criteria and six patients according to the Rosenberg-Patterson diagnostic criteria. None of the patients fulfilled the criteria when evaluated individually with ABPA-S and ABPA-CB. Of patients diagnosed by ISHAM, five had a total IgE level above 1000 IU/mL and two had below 1000 IU/mL.

Conclusions: We demonstrated that the diagnostic criteria developed by the ISHAM ABPA study group were superior to the others in diagnosing ABPA in cases with a total IgE level above 1000 IU/mL. However, all these criteria seem to be sufficient to diagnose ABPA in patients with a total IgE below 1000 IU/mL. We believe the necessity to demonstrate presence of Aspergillus fumigatus precipitating antibodies or specific IgG positivity should be questioned particularly in patients with radiologic findings compatible with ABPA and a total IgE level below 1000 IU/mL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目前诊断ABPA标准的充分性。
目前,过敏性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)有四种不同的诊断标准体系:Rosenberg-Patterson,血清阳性ABPA (ABPA- s),中枢性支气管扩张和ABPA (ABPA- cb),以及国际人畜真菌学学会(ISHAM) ABPA研究组标准。本研究旨在回顾性比较ABPA患者的这四种诊断标准。材料与方法:对诊断为ABPA的随访患者采用这四种诊断标准进行回顾性再评价,并确定各诊断标准的优越性。结果:本研究共纳入10例ABPA患者。7例患者按照ISHAM ABPA研究组诊断标准诊断,6例患者按照Rosenberg-Patterson诊断标准诊断。当单独用ABPA-S和ABPA-CB进行评估时,没有患者符合标准。在ISHAM诊断的患者中,5例总IgE水平高于1000 IU/mL, 2例低于1000 IU/mL。结论:我们证明了ISHAM ABPA研究组制定的诊断标准在诊断总IgE水平高于1000 IU/mL的ABPA病例方面优于其他诊断标准。然而,所有这些标准似乎都足以诊断总IgE低于1000 IU/mL的ABPA患者。我们认为证明烟曲霉沉淀抗体或特异性IgG阳性存在的必要性应该受到质疑,特别是在放射学结果与ABPA一致且总IgE水平低于1000 IU/mL的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the health literacy characteristics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The effect of intravenous low-dose thrombolytics on in-hospital mortality in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism. Current front-line treatment strategies in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC: Balancing efficacy with risks of interstitial lung disease and venous thromboembolism. Segmentation of honeycomb cysts, traction bronchiectasis and emphysematous lung parenchyma using the deep learning method. Evaluation and differential diagnosis of eosinophilia: A tertiary allergy center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1