Subfertile patients underestimate their risk factors of reprotoxic exposure.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ANDROLOGY Basic and Clinical Andrology Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1186/s12610-022-00161-z
Nadia Nouiakh, Claire Sunyach, Sarah-Lyne Jos, Irène Sari-Minodier, Catherine Metzler-Guillemain, Blandine Courbiere, Florence Bretelle, Jeanne Perrin
{"title":"Subfertile patients underestimate their risk factors of reprotoxic exposure.","authors":"Nadia Nouiakh,&nbsp;Claire Sunyach,&nbsp;Sarah-Lyne Jos,&nbsp;Irène Sari-Minodier,&nbsp;Catherine Metzler-Guillemain,&nbsp;Blandine Courbiere,&nbsp;Florence Bretelle,&nbsp;Jeanne Perrin","doi":"10.1186/s12610-022-00161-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure of men and women to environmental reprotoxic agents is associated with impaired fertility and pregnancy rates after assisted reproductive treatment (ART). Nevertheless, such exposures are generally not systematically assessed in current practice before ART and subfertile men are generally less explored than women. Our objective was to study subfertile men and women's level of knowledge about reprotoxic agents, their perception of their own risk factors and the correlation between perceived and identified circumstances of exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our public university hospital, 390 subfertile patients (185 men and 185 women) requiring assisted reproduction technique (ART) treatment, completed a self-report questionnaire before consultation, in order to assess patients' knowledge of reprotoxic exposures, sources of information about them and perception of their own circumstances of exposure. Then a standardized questionnaire was used by the physician during the consultation to estimate domestic, environmental and occupational risk factors of reprotoxic exposures (RFRE). We compared the patients' perception of exposure with the estimated RFRE. The reprotoxic agents knowledge score of patients was 61%. Their main sources of information were the media (40%), the internet (22%) and gynecologists (15%). The standardized questionnaire identified RFRE in 265/390 patients (68%); risk factor was statistically more frequent in men (77%) than in women (59%) (p < 0.05). In total, 141 of the 265 patients with identified RFRE (53%) were aware of their risk factor of reprotoxic exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified risk factors of reprotoxic exposures in the majority of subfertile patients, more frequently in men than in women, and half of patients were not aware of their exposures. Patients' main sources of information were extra medical. Efforts should be made to inform patients, especially men, about potential reprotoxic exposure and to enhance medical training about reprotoxic agents, as recommended by international guidelines. The detection and correction of environmental exposures in subfertile men could improve their fecundity, but also their general health, which has been shown to be poorer than health of fertile men.</p>","PeriodicalId":8730,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-022-00161-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exposure of men and women to environmental reprotoxic agents is associated with impaired fertility and pregnancy rates after assisted reproductive treatment (ART). Nevertheless, such exposures are generally not systematically assessed in current practice before ART and subfertile men are generally less explored than women. Our objective was to study subfertile men and women's level of knowledge about reprotoxic agents, their perception of their own risk factors and the correlation between perceived and identified circumstances of exposure.

Results: In our public university hospital, 390 subfertile patients (185 men and 185 women) requiring assisted reproduction technique (ART) treatment, completed a self-report questionnaire before consultation, in order to assess patients' knowledge of reprotoxic exposures, sources of information about them and perception of their own circumstances of exposure. Then a standardized questionnaire was used by the physician during the consultation to estimate domestic, environmental and occupational risk factors of reprotoxic exposures (RFRE). We compared the patients' perception of exposure with the estimated RFRE. The reprotoxic agents knowledge score of patients was 61%. Their main sources of information were the media (40%), the internet (22%) and gynecologists (15%). The standardized questionnaire identified RFRE in 265/390 patients (68%); risk factor was statistically more frequent in men (77%) than in women (59%) (p < 0.05). In total, 141 of the 265 patients with identified RFRE (53%) were aware of their risk factor of reprotoxic exposure.

Conclusion: We identified risk factors of reprotoxic exposures in the majority of subfertile patients, more frequently in men than in women, and half of patients were not aware of their exposures. Patients' main sources of information were extra medical. Efforts should be made to inform patients, especially men, about potential reprotoxic exposure and to enhance medical training about reprotoxic agents, as recommended by international guidelines. The detection and correction of environmental exposures in subfertile men could improve their fecundity, but also their general health, which has been shown to be poorer than health of fertile men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不孕患者低估了他们接触生殖毒性物质的危险因素。
背景:男性和女性暴露于环境生殖毒性物质与辅助生殖治疗(ART)后的生育能力和怀孕率受损有关。然而,在抗逆转录病毒治疗之前,目前的做法通常没有系统地评估这种接触,而且对生育力低下的男性的研究通常少于女性。我们的目的是研究生殖力低下的男性和女性对生殖毒性物质的知识水平,他们对自身危险因素的认知,以及感知到的和确定的暴露环境之间的相关性。结果:在公立大学附属医院,390例需要辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗的不孕不育患者(185男185女)在会诊前完成了一份自我报告问卷,以评估患者对生殖毒性暴露的知识、信息来源和对自身暴露情况的认识。然后医师在会诊期间使用标准化问卷评估生殖毒性暴露(RFRE)的家庭、环境和职业风险因素。我们比较了患者对暴露的感知与估计的RFRE。患者生殖毒性药物知识得分为61%。她们的主要信息来源是媒体(40%)、互联网(22%)和妇科医生(15%)。标准化问卷确定了265/390例患者(68%)存在RFRE;结论:我们在大多数不孕不育患者中发现了生殖毒性暴露的危险因素,男性比女性更常见,一半的患者没有意识到自己的暴露。患者的主要信息来源是额外的医疗信息。应按照国际准则的建议,努力使病人,特别是男子了解可能接触生殖毒性物质,并加强有关生殖毒性物质的医疗培训。检测和纠正低生育能力男性的环境暴露可以提高他们的生育能力,但也可以改善他们的总体健康状况,这已被证明比有生育能力的男性的健康状况差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Basic and Clinical Andrology
Basic and Clinical Andrology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Clinical Andrology is an open access journal in the domain of andrology covering all aspects of male reproductive and sexual health in both human and animal models. The journal aims to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments in andrology from the international community.
期刊最新文献
The storage time of cryopreserved human spermatozoa does not affect pathways involved in fertility Association between low total serum testosterone and body mass index in Australian survivors of testicular cancer: a retrospective analysis. Changing trends in penile prosthesis implantation in China and an overview of postoperative outcomes from a single center. Secondary azoospermia after a successful natural pregnancy: a primary prospective study. Stem cell therapy in diabetic men with erectile dysfunction: a 24-month follow-up of safety and efficacy of two intracavernous autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells injections, an open label phase 2 clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1