Interpleural location of chest drain on ultrasound excludes pneumothorax and associates with a low degree of chest drain foreshortening on the antero-posterior chest X-ray.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.1186/s13089-022-00296-0
Michal Maly, Masego Candy Mokotedi, Eva Svobodova, Marek Flaksa, Michal Otahal, Zdenek Stach, Jan Rulisek, Tomas Brozek, Michal Porizka, Martin Balik
{"title":"Interpleural location of chest drain on ultrasound excludes pneumothorax and associates with a low degree of chest drain foreshortening on the antero-posterior chest X-ray.","authors":"Michal Maly,&nbsp;Masego Candy Mokotedi,&nbsp;Eva Svobodova,&nbsp;Marek Flaksa,&nbsp;Michal Otahal,&nbsp;Zdenek Stach,&nbsp;Jan Rulisek,&nbsp;Tomas Brozek,&nbsp;Michal Porizka,&nbsp;Martin Balik","doi":"10.1186/s13089-022-00296-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of chest drain (CD) location by bedside imaging methods in the diagnosis of pneumothorax has not been explored in a prospective study yet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Covid-19 ARDS patients with pneumothorax were prospectively monitored with chest ultrasound (CUS) and antero-posterior X-ray (CR) performed after drainage in the safe triangle. CD foreshortening was estimated as a decrease of chest drain index (CDI = length of CD in chest taken from CR/depth of insertion on CD scale + 5 cm). The angle of inclination of the CD was measured between the horizontal line and the CD at the point where it enters pleural space on CR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 106 pneumothorax cases 80 patients had full lung expansion on CUS, the CD was located by CUS in 69 (86%), the CDI was 0.99 (0.88-1.06). 26 cases had a residual pneumothorax after drainage (24.5%), the CD was located by CUS in 31%, the CDI was 0.76 (0.6-0.93),p < 0.01. The risk ratio for a pneumothorax in a patient with not visible CD between the pleural layers on CUS and an associated low CDI on CR was 5.97, p˂0.0001. For the patients with a steep angle of inclination (> 50°) of the CD, the risk ratio for pneumothorax was not significant (p < 0.17). A continued air leak from the CD after drainage is related to the risk for a residual pneumothorax (RR 2.27, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Absence of a CD on CUS post drainage, low CDI on CR and continuous air leak significantly associate with residual occult pneumothorax which may evade diagnosis on an antero-posterior CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":" ","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670049/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00296-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The role of chest drain (CD) location by bedside imaging methods in the diagnosis of pneumothorax has not been explored in a prospective study yet.

Methods: Covid-19 ARDS patients with pneumothorax were prospectively monitored with chest ultrasound (CUS) and antero-posterior X-ray (CR) performed after drainage in the safe triangle. CD foreshortening was estimated as a decrease of chest drain index (CDI = length of CD in chest taken from CR/depth of insertion on CD scale + 5 cm). The angle of inclination of the CD was measured between the horizontal line and the CD at the point where it enters pleural space on CR.

Results: Of the total 106 pneumothorax cases 80 patients had full lung expansion on CUS, the CD was located by CUS in 69 (86%), the CDI was 0.99 (0.88-1.06). 26 cases had a residual pneumothorax after drainage (24.5%), the CD was located by CUS in 31%, the CDI was 0.76 (0.6-0.93),p < 0.01. The risk ratio for a pneumothorax in a patient with not visible CD between the pleural layers on CUS and an associated low CDI on CR was 5.97, p˂0.0001. For the patients with a steep angle of inclination (> 50°) of the CD, the risk ratio for pneumothorax was not significant (p < 0.17). A continued air leak from the CD after drainage is related to the risk for a residual pneumothorax (RR 2.27, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Absence of a CD on CUS post drainage, low CDI on CR and continuous air leak significantly associate with residual occult pneumothorax which may evade diagnosis on an antero-posterior CR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声胸膜间排液位置排除气胸,并与前后胸片上低程度的排液缩短相关。
背景:床边显像方法定位胸腔引流液在气胸诊断中的作用尚未有前瞻性研究探讨。方法:对新冠肺炎ARDS合并气胸患者行安全三角引流后的胸部超声(CUS)和前后x线(CR)前瞻性监测。胸腔引流指数(CDI =从CR取的胸腔内CD长度/ CD刻度上的插入深度+ 5cm)的降低可估计胸腔内CD缩短。结果:本组106例气胸患者中,80例在CUS上有完全肺扩张,69例(86%)被CUS定位,CDI为0.99(0.88-1.06)。引流后残余气胸26例(24.5%),CD位于CUS处占31%,CDI为0.76 (0.6 ~ 0.93),p 50°),发生气胸的风险比无统计学意义(p结论:引流后CUS处无CD, CR处CDI低,持续漏气与残余隐匿性气胸有显著相关性,可回避前后位CR的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
SPOT THE BOT: A comparative quality assessment of AI-generated written instructions for lung ultrasound training. Quality evaluation of ultrasound images for fetal crown-rump length measurement at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation: A fusion model can be interpreted using SHAP method. Description of an independently developed quality assessment tool to meet emergency department credentialing and Emergency Ultrasound Fellowship Accreditation Council guidelines. Dynamic right diaphragmatic herniation revealed by point-of-care ultrasound in hepatic hydrothorax. Towards reduced ultrasound localization microscopy acquisition times by uncoupling a bi-disperse microbubble population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1