Lack of Thoracentesis Competencies and Training in Danish Emergency Departments: A Danish Nationwide Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S384608
Sandra Thun Langsted, Kasper Glerup Lauridsen, Jesper Bo Weile, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Hans Kirkegaard, Bo Løfgren
{"title":"Lack of Thoracentesis Competencies and Training in Danish Emergency Departments: A Danish Nationwide Study.","authors":"Sandra Thun Langsted, Kasper Glerup Lauridsen, Jesper Bo Weile, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Hans Kirkegaard, Bo Løfgren","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S384608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dyspnea caused by pleural effusion is a common reason for admission to the emergency department (ED). In such cases, thoracentesis performed in the ED may allow for swift symptom relief, diagnostics, and early patient discharge. However, the competence level of thoracentesis and training in the ED are currently unclear. This study aimed to describe the current competencies and training in thoracentesis in Danish EDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study in Denmark. A questionnaire was distributed to all EDs in March 2022 including questions on competencies and thoracentesis training methods. Descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 EDs replied (response rate 100%) between March and May 2022. Overall, 50% of consultant and 77% of physicians in emergency medicine specialist training were unable to perform thoracentesis independently. Only 2 of 21 EDs (10%) had a formalized training program. In these 2 EDs, there were no requirements of maintaining these competences. Informal training was reported by 14 out 21 (66%) EDs and consisted of ad-hoc bedside procedural demonstration and/or guidance. Among the 19 EDs without formalized training, 9 (47%) had no intention of establishing a formalized training program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a major lack of thoracentesis competencies in Danish EDs among both consultant and physicians in emergency medicine specialist training. Moreover, the vast majority of EDs had no formalized thoracentesis training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/6b/oaem-14-609.PMC9675400.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S384608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dyspnea caused by pleural effusion is a common reason for admission to the emergency department (ED). In such cases, thoracentesis performed in the ED may allow for swift symptom relief, diagnostics, and early patient discharge. However, the competence level of thoracentesis and training in the ED are currently unclear. This study aimed to describe the current competencies and training in thoracentesis in Danish EDs.

Methods: We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study in Denmark. A questionnaire was distributed to all EDs in March 2022 including questions on competencies and thoracentesis training methods. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: In total, 21 EDs replied (response rate 100%) between March and May 2022. Overall, 50% of consultant and 77% of physicians in emergency medicine specialist training were unable to perform thoracentesis independently. Only 2 of 21 EDs (10%) had a formalized training program. In these 2 EDs, there were no requirements of maintaining these competences. Informal training was reported by 14 out 21 (66%) EDs and consisted of ad-hoc bedside procedural demonstration and/or guidance. Among the 19 EDs without formalized training, 9 (47%) had no intention of establishing a formalized training program.

Conclusion: We found a major lack of thoracentesis competencies in Danish EDs among both consultant and physicians in emergency medicine specialist training. Moreover, the vast majority of EDs had no formalized thoracentesis training program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦急诊科缺乏胸腔穿刺能力和培训:丹麦全国性研究。
背景:胸腔积液引起的呼吸困难是急诊科(ED)收治病人的常见原因。在这种情况下,在急诊科进行胸腔穿刺术可迅速缓解症状、进行诊断并使患者尽早出院。然而,目前还不清楚急诊科胸腔穿刺术的能力水平和培训情况。本研究旨在描述目前丹麦急诊室胸腔穿刺术的能力和培训情况:我们在丹麦开展了一项全国性横断面研究。2022 年 3 月,我们向所有急诊室发放了一份调查问卷,其中包括有关能力和胸腔穿刺术培训方法的问题。研究采用了描述性统计方法:结果:2022 年 3 月至 5 月间,共有 21 家急诊室做出了回复(回复率 100%)。总体而言,50%的顾问医生和77%的接受过急诊医学专科培训的医生无法独立完成胸腔穿刺术。21 家急诊室中只有 2 家(10%)有正式的培训计划。在这两家急诊室中,并没有关于保持这些能力的要求。21家急诊室中有14家(66%)报告了非正式培训,包括临时的床边程序演示和/或指导。在 19 家未进行正规培训的急诊室中,有 9 家(47%)无意制定正规培训计划:我们发现丹麦急诊室的顾问医生和接受急诊医学专科培训的医生都严重缺乏胸腔穿刺术的能力。此外,绝大多数急诊室都没有正规的胸腔穿刺培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Observational Study of Sexual Assaults in French Guiana During 2019-2020 [Letter]. Association of Emergency Department Length of Stay and Hospital Mortality in Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19. Utility of Common Bile Duct Identification on Biliary Ultrasound in Emergency Department Patients. Effect of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Driven vs Standard Diagnostic Pathway on 24-Hour Hospital Stay in Emergency Department Patients with Dyspnea-Protocol for A Randomized Controlled Trial. Accuracy of FAST-ED for Assessment Large Vessel Occlusion of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1