Is Restoration of Hip Center Mandatory for Total Hip Arthroplasty of Protrusio Acetabuli?

Hip & pelvis Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-07 DOI:10.5371/hp.2022.34.2.106
Beom Seok Lee, Hong Seok Kim, O Sang Kwon, Young-Kyun Lee, Yong-Chan Ha, Kyung-Hoi Koo
{"title":"Is Restoration of Hip Center Mandatory for Total Hip Arthroplasty of Protrusio Acetabuli?","authors":"Beom Seok Lee,&nbsp;Hong Seok Kim,&nbsp;O Sang Kwon,&nbsp;Young-Kyun Lee,&nbsp;Yong-Chan Ha,&nbsp;Kyung-Hoi Koo","doi":"10.5371/hp.2022.34.2.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While initial fixation using a press-fit of the acetabular cup is critical for the durability of the component, restoration of the hip center is regarded as an attributable factor for implant survival and successful outcome. In protrusio acetabuli (PA), obtaining both restoration of the hip center and the press-fit of the acetabular cup simultaneously might be difficult during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We tested the hypothesis that use of a medialized cup, if press-fitted, will not result in compromise of the implant stability and outcome after cementless THA of PA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 26 cementless THAs of 22 patients with PA were reviewed. During THA, press-fit of the cup was prioritized rather than hip center restoration. A press-fit was obtained in 24 hips. A press-fit could not be obtained in the two remaining hips; therefore, reinforcement acetabular components were used. Restoration of the hip center was achieved in 17 cups; 15 primary cups and two reinforcement components; it was medialized in nine cups. Implant stability and modified Harris hip score (mHHS) between the two groups were compared at a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (range, 2-16 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six cups; 17 restored cups and nine medialized press-fitted cups, remained stable at the latest follow-up. A similar final mHHS was observed between the restored group and the medialized group (83.6±12.1 vs 83.8±10.4, <i>P</i>=0.786).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant stability and favorable results were obtained by press-fitted cups, irrespective of hip center restoration. THA in PA patients showed promising clinical and radiological results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"34 2","pages":"106-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/28/hp-34-106.PMC9204237.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2022.34.2.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While initial fixation using a press-fit of the acetabular cup is critical for the durability of the component, restoration of the hip center is regarded as an attributable factor for implant survival and successful outcome. In protrusio acetabuli (PA), obtaining both restoration of the hip center and the press-fit of the acetabular cup simultaneously might be difficult during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We tested the hypothesis that use of a medialized cup, if press-fitted, will not result in compromise of the implant stability and outcome after cementless THA of PA.

Materials and methods: A total of 26 cementless THAs of 22 patients with PA were reviewed. During THA, press-fit of the cup was prioritized rather than hip center restoration. A press-fit was obtained in 24 hips. A press-fit could not be obtained in the two remaining hips; therefore, reinforcement acetabular components were used. Restoration of the hip center was achieved in 17 cups; 15 primary cups and two reinforcement components; it was medialized in nine cups. Implant stability and modified Harris hip score (mHHS) between the two groups were compared at a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (range, 2-16 years).

Results: Twenty-six cups; 17 restored cups and nine medialized press-fitted cups, remained stable at the latest follow-up. A similar final mHHS was observed between the restored group and the medialized group (83.6±12.1 vs 83.8±10.4, P=0.786).

Conclusion: Implant stability and favorable results were obtained by press-fitted cups, irrespective of hip center restoration. THA in PA patients showed promising clinical and radiological results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋臼前突全髋关节置换术是否必须恢复髋关节中心?
目的:虽然使用髋臼杯压合的初始固定对假体的耐久性至关重要,但髋关节中心的恢复被认为是假体存活和成功结果的归因因素。在髋臼突出症(PA)中,在全髋关节置换术(THA)中同时获得髋中心的复位和髋臼杯的压合可能是困难的。我们验证了使用中位杯的假设,如果加压安装,不会导致假体稳定性和PA无骨水泥THA后的预后受损。材料与方法:回顾性分析22例PA患者26例无骨水泥tha。在全髋关节置换术中,优先考虑髋臼杯的压合,而不是髋关节中心的恢复。在24个髋部进行压合。其余两个髋部无法获得压合;因此,采用增强髋臼假体。17个髋臼实现髋中心的恢复;15个主杯和2个加固部件;它在9个杯子里。在平均5.1年(范围2-16年)的随访期间,比较两组的植入物稳定性和改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)。结果:26杯;17个修复杯和9个中等压合杯,在最近的随访中保持稳定。恢复组和介质组的最终mHHS相似(83.6±12.1 vs 83.8±10.4,P=0.786)。结论:不论髋关节中心是否复位,加压杯均可获得良好的植入物稳定性和效果。PA患者的THA表现出良好的临床和放射学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological Agent and Total Hip Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy between Ultrasound-guided Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Current Concepts and Medical Management for Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Greater Trochanter Tip as an Anatomical Reference to Minimize Leg Length Discrepancy following Hip Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1