Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals.

JRSM Open Pub Date : 2022-11-14 eCollection Date: 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1177/20542704221132139
Antoni D Gardener, Ellen J Hick, Chloe Jacklin, Gifford Tan, Aidan G Cashin, Hopin Lee, David Nunan, Elaine C Toomey, Georgia C Richards
{"title":"Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals.","authors":"Antoni D Gardener, Ellen J Hick, Chloe Jacklin, Gifford Tan, Aidan G Cashin, Hopin Lee, David Nunan, Elaine C Toomey, Georgia C Richards","doi":"10.1177/20542704221132139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To audit the transparent and open science standards of health and medical sciences journal policies and explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Repeat cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>19 journals listed in Google Scholar's Top Publications for health and medical sciences.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Blood, Cell, Circulation, European Heart Journal, Gastroenterology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Nature Genetics, Nature Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science Translational Medicine, The British Medical Journal, The Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology, and The New England Journal of Medicine.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We used the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guideline and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest (COIs) to evaluate journals standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TOP scores slightly improved during the COVID-19 pandemic, from a median of 5 (IQR: 2-12.5) out of a possible 24 points in February 2020 to 7 (IQR: 4-12) in May 2021, but overall, scores were very low at both time points. Journal policies scored highest for their adherence to data transparency and scored lowest for preregistration of study protocols and analysis plans and the submission of replication studies. Most journals fulfilled all ICMJE provisions for reporting COIs before (84%; n  =  16) and during (95%; n  =  18) the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of practising open science. However, requirements for open science practices in audited policies were overall low, which may impede progress in health and medical research. As key stakeholders in disseminating research, journals should promote a research culture of greater transparency and more robust open science practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":" ","pages":"20542704221132139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/1c/10.1177_20542704221132139.PMC9666860.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704221132139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To audit the transparent and open science standards of health and medical sciences journal policies and explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Repeat cross-sectional study.

Setting: 19 journals listed in Google Scholar's Top Publications for health and medical sciences.

Participants: Blood, Cell, Circulation, European Heart Journal, Gastroenterology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Nature Genetics, Nature Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science Translational Medicine, The British Medical Journal, The Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology, and The New England Journal of Medicine.

Main outcome measures: We used the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guideline and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest (COIs) to evaluate journals standards.

Results: TOP scores slightly improved during the COVID-19 pandemic, from a median of 5 (IQR: 2-12.5) out of a possible 24 points in February 2020 to 7 (IQR: 4-12) in May 2021, but overall, scores were very low at both time points. Journal policies scored highest for their adherence to data transparency and scored lowest for preregistration of study protocols and analysis plans and the submission of replication studies. Most journals fulfilled all ICMJE provisions for reporting COIs before (84%; n  =  16) and during (95%; n  =  18) the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of practising open science. However, requirements for open science practices in audited policies were overall low, which may impede progress in health and medical research. As key stakeholders in disseminating research, journals should promote a research culture of greater transparency and more robust open science practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行之前和期间医学和健康科学期刊的开放科学和利益冲突政策:重复横断面研究:医学期刊的开放科学政策。
目的审核健康和医学科学期刊政策的透明和开放科学标准,探讨 COVID-19 大流行的影响:重复横断面研究:19种期刊被列入谷歌学术的健康与医学科学顶级刊物:血液》、《细胞》、《循环》、《欧洲心脏杂志》、《胃肠病学》、《临床肿瘤学杂志》、《美国心脏病学会杂志》、《自然遗传学》、《自然医学》、《自然神经科学》、《神经元》、《PLoS ONE》、《美国科学院院刊》、《科学转化医学》、《英国医学杂志》、《美国医学会杂志》、《柳叶刀》、《柳叶刀肿瘤学》和《新英格兰医学杂志》:我们采用透明度与公开性促进(TOP)指南和国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)关于披露利益冲突(COIs)的要求来评估期刊的标准:TOP得分在COVID-19大流行期间略有提高,从2020年2月的中位数5分(IQR:2-12.5)(满分24分)提高到2021年5月的7分(IQR:4-12),但总体而言,两个时间点的得分都很低。期刊政策在遵守数据透明度方面得分最高,而在研究方案和分析计划的预先登记以及提交复制研究方面得分最低。大多数期刊在COVID-19大流行之前(84%;n = 16)和期间(95%;n = 18)都遵守了ICMJE关于报告COIs的所有规定:COVID-19大流行凸显了实践开放科学的重要性。然而,经审计的政策中对开放科学实践的要求总体较低,这可能会阻碍健康和医学研究的进展。作为传播研究成果的关键利益相关方,期刊应促进研究文化的更大透明度和更有力的开放科学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Providing personalised care for people with tuberculosis: an evaluation of enhanced case management in a UK TB Network 2013 to 2021. Redeployment experiences of healthcare workers in the UK during COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis from the nationwide UK-REACH study. Surgical reconstruction for spasticity and contracture: An underutilised rehabilitative strategy of adult stroke. Long COVID symptoms and demographic associations: A retrospective case series study using healthcare application data. Racial microaggressions within the UK Healthcare System: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1