The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index May Predict the Coronary Slow Flow Better Than High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-11-09 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7344639
Kurtulus Karauzum, Irem Karauzum, Kaan Hanci, Dogus Gokcek, Beyzanur Gunay, Hussain Bakhshian, Tayfun Sahin, Ertan Ural
{"title":"The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index May Predict the Coronary Slow Flow Better Than High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography.","authors":"Kurtulus Karauzum,&nbsp;Irem Karauzum,&nbsp;Kaan Hanci,&nbsp;Dogus Gokcek,&nbsp;Beyzanur Gunay,&nbsp;Hussain Bakhshian,&nbsp;Tayfun Sahin,&nbsp;Ertan Ural","doi":"10.1155/2022/7344639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 197 patients (102 patients with CSF; 95 patients with normal coronary flow) were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients were obtained from hospital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with CSF had higher SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels compared with the control group. Body mass index (<i>p</i>=0.022, OR 1.151, 95% CI 1.121-1.299), low-density lipoprotein (<i>p</i>=0.018, OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.005-1.052), hsCRP (<i>p</i>=0.044, OR 1.161, 95% CI 1.004-1.343), and SII (<i>p</i> < 0.001, OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026) were independent predictors of CSF in the multivariable analysis. The optimal cutoff value of SII in predicting CSF was >877 in ROC curve analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.001, AUC = 0.892, 95% CI 0.848-0.936). This cutoff value of SII predicted the CSF with a sensitivity of 71.5% and specificity of 92.4%. Spearman correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between the mean TFC value and PLR, NLR, hsCRP, and SII.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII may be used as a better indicator for the prediction of CSF than hsCRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668456/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7344639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Methods: A total of 197 patients (102 patients with CSF; 95 patients with normal coronary flow) were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients were obtained from hospital records.

Results: Patients with CSF had higher SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels compared with the control group. Body mass index (p=0.022, OR 1.151, 95% CI 1.121-1.299), low-density lipoprotein (p=0.018, OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.005-1.052), hsCRP (p=0.044, OR 1.161, 95% CI 1.004-1.343), and SII (p < 0.001, OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026) were independent predictors of CSF in the multivariable analysis. The optimal cutoff value of SII in predicting CSF was >877 in ROC curve analysis (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.892, 95% CI 0.848-0.936). This cutoff value of SII predicted the CSF with a sensitivity of 71.5% and specificity of 92.4%. Spearman correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between the mean TFC value and PLR, NLR, hsCRP, and SII.

Conclusions: SII may be used as a better indicator for the prediction of CSF than hsCRP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性冠状动脉造影患者的全身免疫炎症指数可能比高敏c反应蛋白更能预测冠状动脉慢血流。
方法:共197例患者(脑脊液102例;95例冠状动脉血流正常的患者被纳入回顾性研究。患者的临床和血管造影特征从医院记录中获得。结果:脑脊液患者SII、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、高敏c反应蛋白(hsCRP)水平均高于对照组。在多变量分析中,体重指数(p=0.022, OR 1.151, 95% CI 1.121-1.299)、低密度脂蛋白(p=0.018, OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.005-1.052)、hsCRP (p=0.044, OR 1.161, 95% CI 1.004-1.343)和SII (p < 0.001, OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.026)是脑脊液的独立预测因子。ROC曲线分析SII预测CSF的最佳临界值>877 (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.892, 95% CI 0.848 ~ 0.936)。SII截断值预测脑脊液的敏感性为71.5%,特异性为92.4%。Spearman相关分析显示,TFC均值与PLR、NLR、hsCRP、SII呈正相关。结论:SII比hsCRP能更好地预测脑脊液的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Cycloergometer on Cardiopulmonary Function in Elderly Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Clinical Trial. Inhibiting H2AX Can Ameliorate Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Regulating P53/JNK Signaling Pathway. Atrial Strain and Strain Rate in a General Population: Do These Measures Improve the Assessment of Elevated NT-proBNP Levels? The Pharmacological Mechanisms Underlying the Protective Effect of Ginsenoside Rg3 against Heart Failure. Beta-Thalassemia Major and Myocardial Iron Overload: A Longitudinal Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1