Measuring Parent Rated Interest and Deprivation Type Curiosity in Swedish Young Children - Are they Meaningfully Distinct?

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2478/sjcapp-2022-0007
John Michel Kaneko
{"title":"Measuring Parent Rated Interest and Deprivation Type Curiosity in Swedish Young Children - Are they Meaningfully Distinct?","authors":"John Michel Kaneko","doi":"10.2478/sjcapp-2022-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proxy ratings of young children's curiosity has the potential to be useful for research in Sweden. One such proxy rating is the parent-rating Interest/Deprivation Young Children scale. This scale has previously only been validated in Dutch samples, where it differentiated curiosity dimensions of interest (joyful exploration) and deprivation (reduction of aversive feelings of not knowing).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate internal and construct validity of the Swedish version of the Interest/Deprivation Young Children scale.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A translation of the Interest/Deprivation Young Children scale was conducted and then administered to 266 parents in Sweden, who rated their children (4-6-years old) on 10 items, with 5 items each for subscales of interest and deprivation dimensions of epistemic curiosity. Responses were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate acceptable internal reliability for deprivation-curiosity items (α = 0.78) and for interest-curiosity items (α = 0.79). For the combined scale score alpha was found good (α = 0.84). However, confirmatory factor analysis failed to differentiate interest and deprivation dimensions of curiosity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Item revisions are suggested which could be implemented for further investigations. Also, the possibility of using the I/D-YC total score as a more general measure of child curiosity is argued for. An open question is how other dimensions of curiosity might be more viable for proxy ratings of child curiosity.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/9d/sjcapp-10-064.PMC9238430.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjcapp-2022-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proxy ratings of young children's curiosity has the potential to be useful for research in Sweden. One such proxy rating is the parent-rating Interest/Deprivation Young Children scale. This scale has previously only been validated in Dutch samples, where it differentiated curiosity dimensions of interest (joyful exploration) and deprivation (reduction of aversive feelings of not knowing).

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate internal and construct validity of the Swedish version of the Interest/Deprivation Young Children scale.

Method: A translation of the Interest/Deprivation Young Children scale was conducted and then administered to 266 parents in Sweden, who rated their children (4-6-years old) on 10 items, with 5 items each for subscales of interest and deprivation dimensions of epistemic curiosity. Responses were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: Results indicate acceptable internal reliability for deprivation-curiosity items (α = 0.78) and for interest-curiosity items (α = 0.79). For the combined scale score alpha was found good (α = 0.84). However, confirmatory factor analysis failed to differentiate interest and deprivation dimensions of curiosity.

Conclusions: Item revisions are suggested which could be implemented for further investigations. Also, the possibility of using the I/D-YC total score as a more general measure of child curiosity is argued for. An open question is how other dimensions of curiosity might be more viable for proxy ratings of child curiosity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量瑞典幼儿的父母评级兴趣和剥夺型好奇心-它们有意义的区别吗?
背景:在瑞典,幼儿好奇心的代理评级有可能对研究有用。其中一个代理评级是父母评级兴趣/剥夺幼儿量表。这个量表以前只在荷兰的样本中得到验证,它区分了兴趣(快乐的探索)和剥夺(减少不知道的厌恶感)的好奇心维度。目的:本研究的目的是调查瑞典版幼儿兴趣/剥夺量表的内部效度和结构效度。方法:对瑞典266名家长进行了兴趣/剥夺幼儿量表的翻译,并对他们的孩子(4-6岁)进行了10项评分,其中知识好奇心的兴趣和剥夺维度各有5项。采用验证性因子分析对反应进行分析。结果:剥夺-好奇项目和兴趣-好奇项目的内信度分别为α = 0.78和α = 0.79。对于联合量表,alpha得分较好(α = 0.84)。然而,验证性因子分析未能区分好奇心的兴趣和剥夺维度。结论:建议对项目进行修订,以便进一步调查。此外,使用I/D-YC总分作为儿童好奇心的更普遍衡量标准的可能性也是有争议的。一个悬而未决的问题是,好奇心的其他维度如何更适用于儿童好奇心的代理评级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Vanderbilt Children's ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale (VADRS-A) in a Saudi Population Sample. Dealing with overwhelming life situations - young people's experiences of becoming depressed. Digital Psychosocial Follow-up for Childhood Critical Illness Survivors: A Qualitative Interview Study on Health Professionals' Perspectives. The Critical Role of Attachment Theory in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care. Coping Styles and Defense Mechanisms Mediate Associations Between Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences and CPTSD Symptoms in Faroese Adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1