Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Journal of hematology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.14740/jh1007
Matthew Crabtree, Jennifer Cai, Xin Qing
{"title":"Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence <i>In Situ</i> Hybridization for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Matthew Crabtree,&nbsp;Jennifer Cai,&nbsp;Xin Qing","doi":"10.14740/jh1007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, with cytogenetic findings that determine disease behavior. Genetic abnormalities can be assessed by fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization (FISH) analysis and/or G-banded karyotyping. The two methods produce unique and overlapping information, and the clinical utility of using both is investigated here.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients diagnosed with MM at a hospital in Southern California were retrospectively reviewed for the FISH and G-banded karyotyping results obtained from bone marrow specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Karyotype was normal in 71% (50/70), abnormal in 27% (19/70), and inadequate in 1% (1/70). Among patients with abnormal karyotype, FISH provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 95% of cases (18/19). Among cases with abnormal FISH, karyotype provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 27% of cases (18/66). When numerical abnormalities were present (detected by FISH and/or karyotype), FISH detected them in 95% (54/57), of which karyotype missed 70% (38/54) of the time. Karyotyping detected numerical abnormalities in 33% (19/57), which FISH missed 16% (3/19) of the time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Karyotyping and FISH analysis in MM each provide unique information. For most patients, performing both tests together will provide more information than either test alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/9b/jh-11-087.PMC9275438.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh1007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, with cytogenetic findings that determine disease behavior. Genetic abnormalities can be assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and/or G-banded karyotyping. The two methods produce unique and overlapping information, and the clinical utility of using both is investigated here.

Methods: Seventy patients diagnosed with MM at a hospital in Southern California were retrospectively reviewed for the FISH and G-banded karyotyping results obtained from bone marrow specimens.

Results: Karyotype was normal in 71% (50/70), abnormal in 27% (19/70), and inadequate in 1% (1/70). Among patients with abnormal karyotype, FISH provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 95% of cases (18/19). Among cases with abnormal FISH, karyotype provided additional information about genetic aberrations in 27% of cases (18/66). When numerical abnormalities were present (detected by FISH and/or karyotype), FISH detected them in 95% (54/57), of which karyotype missed 70% (38/54) of the time. Karyotyping detected numerical abnormalities in 33% (19/57), which FISH missed 16% (3/19) of the time.

Conclusions: Karyotyping and FISH analysis in MM each provide unique information. For most patients, performing both tests together will provide more information than either test alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规核型和荧光原位杂交检测多发性骨髓瘤染色体异常。
背景:多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种遗传异质性疾病,其细胞遗传学结果决定了疾病行为。遗传异常可以通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)分析和/或g带核型来评估。这两种方法产生独特和重叠的信息,并在此研究两者的临床应用。方法:回顾性分析南加州一家医院诊断为MM的70例患者骨髓标本的FISH和g带核型结果。结果:核型正常者占71%(50/70),异常者占27%(19/70),不正常者占1%(1/70)。在核型异常的患者中,95%的病例(18/19)FISH提供了遗传畸变的额外信息。在FISH异常的病例中,核型提供了27%的遗传异常的额外信息(18/66)。当存在数值异常(FISH和/或核型检测)时,95% (54/57)FISH检测到异常,其中核型缺失70%(38/54)。核型检出数值异常的比例为33% (19/57),FISH漏检率为16%(3/19)。结论:MM的核型分析和FISH分析各自提供了独特的信息。对于大多数患者来说,同时进行这两项检查比单独进行任何一项检查提供的信息更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hematology
Journal of hematology HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation After Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Managed With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis. Controversies in the Management of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Accidents in Patients With Non-Promyelocytic Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Ferritin and Iron Levels Inversely Associated With Lymphoma Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Freedom From Bleeds With Low-Dose Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Inhibitor-Positive Hemophilia A. Primary Refractory Discordant Diffuse Large B-Cell and Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1