Rabies in kudu: Revisited.

2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Advances in Virus Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-20 DOI:10.1016/bs.aivir.2022.04.001
Thomas Müller, Rainer Hassel, Mark Jago, Siegfried Khaiseb, Jolandie van der Westhuizen, Adriaan Vos, Sten Calvelage, Susanne Fischer, Denise A Marston, Anthony R Fooks, Dirk Höper, Conrad M Freuling
{"title":"Rabies in kudu: Revisited.","authors":"Thomas Müller,&nbsp;Rainer Hassel,&nbsp;Mark Jago,&nbsp;Siegfried Khaiseb,&nbsp;Jolandie van der Westhuizen,&nbsp;Adriaan Vos,&nbsp;Sten Calvelage,&nbsp;Susanne Fischer,&nbsp;Denise A Marston,&nbsp;Anthony R Fooks,&nbsp;Dirk Höper,&nbsp;Conrad M Freuling","doi":"10.1016/bs.aivir.2022.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rabies infects all mammals; however, transmission cycles are only maintained in certain bat and carnivore species. The high incidence of rabies in Greater Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) observed in Namibia for over 40 years has led to postulation that independent virus transmission is occurring within this antelope population. We have analysed extensive experimental, epidemiological, phylogeographic and deep sequence data, which collectively refute maintenance of an independent rabies cycle in kudu. As rabies in kudu continues to have a negative impact on the Namibian agricultural sector, measures to protect kudu have been investigated, including the use of a third-generation oral rabies vaccine. Initial results show protection of kudu from rabies infection via the oral route, with an appropriate bait design, different application schedules and vaccination doses further enhancing the immune response. Rabies in kudu is a complex interplay at the wildlife-livestock interface and requires a concerted approach to successfully control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Virus Research","volume":" ","pages":"115-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Virus Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2022.04.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rabies infects all mammals; however, transmission cycles are only maintained in certain bat and carnivore species. The high incidence of rabies in Greater Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) observed in Namibia for over 40 years has led to postulation that independent virus transmission is occurring within this antelope population. We have analysed extensive experimental, epidemiological, phylogeographic and deep sequence data, which collectively refute maintenance of an independent rabies cycle in kudu. As rabies in kudu continues to have a negative impact on the Namibian agricultural sector, measures to protect kudu have been investigated, including the use of a third-generation oral rabies vaccine. Initial results show protection of kudu from rabies infection via the oral route, with an appropriate bait design, different application schedules and vaccination doses further enhancing the immune response. Rabies in kudu is a complex interplay at the wildlife-livestock interface and requires a concerted approach to successfully control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
kudu的狂犬病:重访。
狂犬病感染所有哺乳动物;然而,传播周期只在某些蝙蝠和食肉动物物种中维持。40多年来在纳米比亚观察到的大库杜羚羊(strepsiceros)狂犬病的高发病率导致人们假设该羚羊种群中正在发生独立的病毒传播。我们分析了广泛的实验、流行病学、系统地理和深层序列数据,这些数据共同驳斥了在库杜维持独立狂犬病周期的说法。由于库杜犬的狂犬病继续对纳米比亚农业部门产生负面影响,已对保护库杜犬的措施进行了调查,包括使用第三代口服狂犬病疫苗。初步结果表明,通过适当的毒饵设计、不同的施用时间表和接种剂量,可进一步增强kudu的免疫反应,从而保护kudu免受狂犬病感染。大羚羊的狂犬病是一种复杂的野生动物与牲畜之间的相互作用,需要协调一致的方法来成功控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
CMV-encoded GPCRs in infection, disease, and pathogenesis. Defense signaling pathways in resistance to plant viruses: Crosstalk and finger pointing. The New Zealand perspective of an ecosystem biology response to grapevine leafroll disease. Selection of nonstandard viral genomes during the evolution of RNA viruses: A virus survival strategy or a pesky inconvenience? Ubiquitination in viral entry and replication: Mechanisms and implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1