Frequency and management of emergencies in primary care offices: A cross-sectional study in northwestern Germany.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2022.2094912
Max Melzel, Falk Hoffmann, Michael H Freitag, Ove Spreckelsen
{"title":"Frequency and management of emergencies in primary care offices: A cross-sectional study in northwestern Germany.","authors":"Max Melzel,&nbsp;Falk Hoffmann,&nbsp;Michael H Freitag,&nbsp;Ove Spreckelsen","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2022.2094912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little literature exists on emergencies within primary care offices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to study the occurrence of emergencies and confidence in dealing with them among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among all PCPs with licences to practice with an own office (<i>n</i> = 915) in a northwestern region in Germany in 2019. Participants were asked to estimate the frequency and type of emergencies that occurred in the last 12 months in their office and about their confidence in managing emergency situations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Answers from 375 PCPs could be analysed (response: 41.0%); 95.7% reported at least one emergency in their office within the last 12 months (mean 12.9). PCPs from rural offices reported more emergencies (on average 13.7 vs. 9.6). Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac arrhythmia and dyspnoea were the most common emergencies. A greater likelihood of feeling more confident in managing medical emergencies was found among male physicians, general internists, PCPs additionally qualified as emergency physicians and those with previous training in the emergency department and intensive care unit. In contrast, more general practitioners felt secure treating paediatric emergencies than general internists (highest level of confidence 22.1% vs. 16.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Germany, emergencies in primary care offices occur on average once a month and more often in rural than urban areas. While most PCPs are confident in managing medical emergencies, some differences related to the training path became apparent. Ongoing training programmes may be tailored to improve emergency skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291701/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2094912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Little literature exists on emergencies within primary care offices.

Objectives: We aimed to study the occurrence of emergencies and confidence in dealing with them among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Germany.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among all PCPs with licences to practice with an own office (n = 915) in a northwestern region in Germany in 2019. Participants were asked to estimate the frequency and type of emergencies that occurred in the last 12 months in their office and about their confidence in managing emergency situations.

Results: Answers from 375 PCPs could be analysed (response: 41.0%); 95.7% reported at least one emergency in their office within the last 12 months (mean 12.9). PCPs from rural offices reported more emergencies (on average 13.7 vs. 9.6). Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac arrhythmia and dyspnoea were the most common emergencies. A greater likelihood of feeling more confident in managing medical emergencies was found among male physicians, general internists, PCPs additionally qualified as emergency physicians and those with previous training in the emergency department and intensive care unit. In contrast, more general practitioners felt secure treating paediatric emergencies than general internists (highest level of confidence 22.1% vs. 16.3%).

Conclusion: In Germany, emergencies in primary care offices occur on average once a month and more often in rural than urban areas. While most PCPs are confident in managing medical emergencies, some differences related to the training path became apparent. Ongoing training programmes may be tailored to improve emergency skills.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健办公室急诊的频率和管理:德国西北部的一项横断面研究。
背景:关于初级保健办公室急诊的文献很少。目的:我们旨在研究急诊的发生情况以及德国初级保健医生(pcp)处理急诊的信心。方法:我们对2019年在德国西北部地区拥有自己办公室执业执照的所有pcp (n = 915)进行了横断面研究。与会者被要求估计过去12个月在其办公室发生的紧急情况的频率和类型,以及他们对管理紧急情况的信心。结果:375个pcp的回答可以被分析,回答率为41.0%;95.7%的人报告在过去12个月内至少在其办公室发生过一次紧急情况(平均12.9次)。农村办事处的pcp报告了更多的紧急情况(平均13.7次对9.6次)。急性冠状动脉综合征、心律失常和呼吸困难是最常见的紧急情况。男性医生、普通内科医生、另外有急诊医生资格的初级医师以及以前在急诊科和重症监护病房接受过培训的人更有可能对处理医疗紧急情况感到更有信心。相比之下,全科医生在治疗儿科急诊时比全科内科医生更有安全感(最高置信度22.1%对16.3%)。结论:在德国,初级保健办公室的紧急情况平均每月发生一次,农村地区比城市地区更频繁。虽然大多数pcp对处理医疗紧急情况有信心,但与培训路径有关的一些差异变得明显。正在进行的培训方案可加以调整,以提高应急技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
期刊最新文献
Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view. Diagnostic flow for all patients referred with non-specific symptoms of cancer to a diagnostic centre in Denmark: A descriptive study. Monitoring COVID-19 in Belgian general practice: A tool for syndromic surveillance based on electronic health records. Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire. The experiences of transgender and nonbinary adults in primary care: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1