Prevalence of Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, and MNS antigens in the Hispanic donor population of South Texas.

Q4 Medicine Immunohematology Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.21307/immunohematology-2022-040
T R Wafford, L P Walker
{"title":"Prevalence of Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, and MNS antigens in the Hispanic donor population of South Texas.","authors":"T R Wafford,&nbsp;L P Walker","doi":"10.21307/immunohematology-2022-040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As population diversity in the United States expands, understanding antigen prevalence by ethnic group is essential. Differences in antigen prevalence among ethnicities have caused increased alloimmunization in chronically transfused patients. Recognizing these differences in patients and donors can reduce the risk of patients developing alloantibodies. Also, determining the antigen prevalence by ethnicity will improve the ability of blood centers to have compatible blood available. Thus far, there has not been significant published data on antigen prevalence of the U.S. Hispanic population. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of red blood cell (RBC) antigens, as determined by human erythrocyte antigen genotyping, in South Texas Hispanic blood donors. A total of 3455 donors, seen from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2020, were included in the study. These donors met the inclusion criteria of self-selecting Hispanic ethnicity and successfully donating a RBC component. The antigen results for each included donor were entered into a data collection spreadsheet. The prevalence of each antigen was calculated. A binomial test was performed to determine if the observed results are statistically different as compared with the published prevalence of antigens in white and black populations. After statistical analysis, the p value for most antigens was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The Kidd blood group antigens were the only major antigens that did not show a significant difference. Cohen's h showed a large effect size for most antigens when compared with those of the black population and a small to medium effect size when compared with those of the white population. For most blood groups antigens, their prevalence in Hispanic donors was significantly different than that published for both white and black populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"38 2","pages":"43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2022-040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As population diversity in the United States expands, understanding antigen prevalence by ethnic group is essential. Differences in antigen prevalence among ethnicities have caused increased alloimmunization in chronically transfused patients. Recognizing these differences in patients and donors can reduce the risk of patients developing alloantibodies. Also, determining the antigen prevalence by ethnicity will improve the ability of blood centers to have compatible blood available. Thus far, there has not been significant published data on antigen prevalence of the U.S. Hispanic population. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of red blood cell (RBC) antigens, as determined by human erythrocyte antigen genotyping, in South Texas Hispanic blood donors. A total of 3455 donors, seen from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2020, were included in the study. These donors met the inclusion criteria of self-selecting Hispanic ethnicity and successfully donating a RBC component. The antigen results for each included donor were entered into a data collection spreadsheet. The prevalence of each antigen was calculated. A binomial test was performed to determine if the observed results are statistically different as compared with the published prevalence of antigens in white and black populations. After statistical analysis, the p value for most antigens was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The Kidd blood group antigens were the only major antigens that did not show a significant difference. Cohen's h showed a large effect size for most antigens when compared with those of the black population and a small to medium effect size when compared with those of the white population. For most blood groups antigens, their prevalence in Hispanic donors was significantly different than that published for both white and black populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy和MNS抗原在南德克萨斯州西班牙裔供体人群中的流行。
随着美国人口多样性的扩大,了解不同种族的抗原流行情况至关重要。不同种族间抗原流行率的差异导致慢性输血患者同种异体免疫增加。认识到患者和供体的这些差异可以降低患者产生同种异体抗体的风险。此外,按种族确定抗原流行率将提高血液中心提供相容血液的能力。到目前为止,还没有关于美国西班牙裔人口抗原流行率的重要出版数据。在南德克萨斯州西班牙裔献血者中进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,以确定红细胞抗原(RBC)的流行程度,通过人红细胞抗原基因分型确定。从2015年1月1日到2020年5月31日,共有3455名捐赠者被纳入该研究。这些献血者符合自选西班牙裔的入选标准,并成功捐献了一种RBC成分。每个供体的抗原结果被输入到数据收集电子表格中。计算各抗原的流行率。进行二项检验以确定观察到的结果与已公布的抗原在白人和黑人人群中的流行率相比是否有统计学差异。经统计分析,多数抗原的p值均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。基德血型抗原是唯一没有表现出显著差异的主要抗原。Cohen's h表明,与黑人人群相比,大多数抗原的效应量很大,而与白人人群相比,效应量较小至中等。对于大多数血型抗原,它们在西班牙裔献血者中的流行程度明显不同于在白人和黑人人群中公布的流行程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
A challenging case of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-Ku in a K0 (Kellnull) mother. Mixed-field ABO front typing as an early sign of disease recurrence in ABO-matched stem cell transplantation. Red blood cell extended antigen typing in Omani patients with sickle cell disease to enhance daily transfusion practice. The American Rare Donor Program: 25 years supporting rare blood needs. Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1