Cannabinoids and solid organ transplantation: Psychiatric perspectives and recommendations

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Reviews Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2022.100715
Gerald Scott Winder , Sarah R. Andrews , Arpita Goswami Banerjee , Filza Hussain , Ana Ivkovic , Kristin Kuntz , Lesley Omary , Akhil Shenoy , Thida Thant , Amy VandenBerg , Paula Zimbrean
{"title":"Cannabinoids and solid organ transplantation: Psychiatric perspectives and recommendations","authors":"Gerald Scott Winder ,&nbsp;Sarah R. Andrews ,&nbsp;Arpita Goswami Banerjee ,&nbsp;Filza Hussain ,&nbsp;Ana Ivkovic ,&nbsp;Kristin Kuntz ,&nbsp;Lesley Omary ,&nbsp;Akhil Shenoy ,&nbsp;Thida Thant ,&nbsp;Amy VandenBerg ,&nbsp;Paula Zimbrean","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2022.100715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Cannabinoid<span> use in patients seeking </span></span>solid organ transplantation<span> (SOT) is an important and unsettled matter which all transplantation clinicians regularly encounter. It is also a multifaceted, interprofessional issue, difficult for any specialty alone to adequately address in a research article or during clinical care. Such uncertainty lends itself to bias for or against cannabinoid use accompanied by inconsistent policies and procedures. Scientific literature in SOT regarding cannabinoids often narrowly examines the issue and exists mostly in liver and kidney transplantation<span>. Published recommendations from professional societies are mosaics of vagueness and specificity mirroring the ongoing dilemma. The cannabinoid information SOT clinicians need for clinical care may require data and perspectives from diverse medical literature which are rarely synthesized. SOT teams may not be adequately staffed or trained to address various neuropsychiatric cannabinoid effects and risks in patients. In this article, authors from US transplantation centers conduct a systematized review of the few existing studies regarding clinician perceptions, use rates, and clinical impact of cannabinoid use in SOT patients; collate representative professional society guidance on the topic; draw from diverse medical literature bases to detail facets of cannabinoid use in psychiatry and addiction pertinent to all transplantation clinicians; provide basic clinical and policy recommendations; and indicate areas of future study.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"36 4","pages":"Article 100715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X22000386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cannabinoid use in patients seeking solid organ transplantation (SOT) is an important and unsettled matter which all transplantation clinicians regularly encounter. It is also a multifaceted, interprofessional issue, difficult for any specialty alone to adequately address in a research article or during clinical care. Such uncertainty lends itself to bias for or against cannabinoid use accompanied by inconsistent policies and procedures. Scientific literature in SOT regarding cannabinoids often narrowly examines the issue and exists mostly in liver and kidney transplantation. Published recommendations from professional societies are mosaics of vagueness and specificity mirroring the ongoing dilemma. The cannabinoid information SOT clinicians need for clinical care may require data and perspectives from diverse medical literature which are rarely synthesized. SOT teams may not be adequately staffed or trained to address various neuropsychiatric cannabinoid effects and risks in patients. In this article, authors from US transplantation centers conduct a systematized review of the few existing studies regarding clinician perceptions, use rates, and clinical impact of cannabinoid use in SOT patients; collate representative professional society guidance on the topic; draw from diverse medical literature bases to detail facets of cannabinoid use in psychiatry and addiction pertinent to all transplantation clinicians; provide basic clinical and policy recommendations; and indicate areas of future study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻素和实体器官移植:精神病学观点和建议
大麻素在寻求实体器官移植(SOT)患者中的使用是所有移植临床医生经常遇到的重要和未解决的问题。这也是一个多方面的、跨专业的问题,任何专业都难以单独在研究文章或临床护理中充分解决。这种不确定性导致支持或反对大麻素使用的偏见,同时伴随着不一致的政策和程序。关于大麻素的SOT科学文献通常只对这个问题进行了狭隘的研究,并且主要存在于肝和肾移植中。专业协会发表的建议是模糊和特异性的马赛克,反映了目前的困境。SOT临床医生需要临床护理的大麻素信息可能需要来自不同医学文献的数据和观点,这些文献很少被合成。SOT团队可能没有足够的人员或培训来解决各种神经精神大麻素对患者的影响和风险。在这篇文章中,来自美国移植中心的作者对少数现有的关于SOT患者使用大麻素的临床医生看法、使用率和临床影响的研究进行了系统的回顾;整理有代表性的专业学会对课题的指导意见;从不同的医学文献基础,以详细方面大麻素在精神病学和成瘾相关的所有移植临床医生;提供基本的临床和政策建议;并指出未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
期刊最新文献
Assessing cumulative exposure to maintenance immunosuppressive drugs: Metrics, outcomes, and implications for transplant patients Transition from preclinical to clinical application of CTLA4-Ig co-stimulation blockage in beta-cell replacement therapy Effect of everolimus administration on renal function in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis Diagnosing portal vein stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation: A systematic review The impact of pancreas transplantation on diabetic complications: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1