The associations between basic psychological need satisfaction at work and the wellbeing of Indigenous and non-Indigenous employees.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Transcultural Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-22 DOI:10.1177/13634615221111634
Natasha R Magson, Rhonda G Craven, Richard M Ryan, Fabri Blacklock, Alicia Franklin, Janet Mooney, Alexander S Yeung, Anthony Dillon
{"title":"The associations between basic psychological need satisfaction at work and the wellbeing of Indigenous and non-Indigenous employees.","authors":"Natasha R Magson, Rhonda G Craven, Richard M Ryan, Fabri Blacklock, Alicia Franklin, Janet Mooney, Alexander S Yeung, Anthony Dillon","doi":"10.1177/13634615221111634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated how satisfaction of the basic psychological needs at work was associated with the psychological and physical wellbeing of Indigenous and non-Indigenous employees both within and outside of the workplace. Participants included 1,146 Indigenous (<i>n</i> = 559) and non-Indigenous Australians (60.9% female), aged 18 to 81 years (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 43.54) who were recruited through their employer or online advertisements. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyse the data, and Indigenous status and occupation type were investigated as moderators. Results revealed that independent of income, autonomy satisfaction was related to better physical and psychological health, satisfaction of the need for relatedness was associated with increased family and community thriving, and competence satisfaction was linked to decreased psychological distress. Results also showed that autonomy, competence, and relatedness need satisfaction was lower among Indigenous employees compared to non-Indigenous employees. Moderation analyses suggested that relatedness at work was especially important for non-Indigenous employees' connection with their community, as were high levels of competence satisfaction for Indigenous employees. These findings are discussed in the context of self-determination theory and the implications for organizations wanting to improve the wellbeing of their Indigenous and non-Indigenous workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":47864,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"440-456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615221111634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated how satisfaction of the basic psychological needs at work was associated with the psychological and physical wellbeing of Indigenous and non-Indigenous employees both within and outside of the workplace. Participants included 1,146 Indigenous (n = 559) and non-Indigenous Australians (60.9% female), aged 18 to 81 years (Mage = 43.54) who were recruited through their employer or online advertisements. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyse the data, and Indigenous status and occupation type were investigated as moderators. Results revealed that independent of income, autonomy satisfaction was related to better physical and psychological health, satisfaction of the need for relatedness was associated with increased family and community thriving, and competence satisfaction was linked to decreased psychological distress. Results also showed that autonomy, competence, and relatedness need satisfaction was lower among Indigenous employees compared to non-Indigenous employees. Moderation analyses suggested that relatedness at work was especially important for non-Indigenous employees' connection with their community, as were high levels of competence satisfaction for Indigenous employees. These findings are discussed in the context of self-determination theory and the implications for organizations wanting to improve the wellbeing of their Indigenous and non-Indigenous workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中基本心理需求的满足与土著和非土著雇员福祉之间的关系。
我们调查了工作中基本心理需求的满足与土著和非土著雇员在工作场所内外的身心健康之间的关系。参与者包括 1,146 名澳大利亚原住民(n = 559)和非原住民(60.9% 为女性),年龄在 18 岁至 81 岁之间(Mage = 43.54),他们是通过雇主或网上广告招募的。采用结构方程模型(SEM)分析数据,并将土著身份和职业类型作为调节因素进行研究。结果显示,与收入无关,自主性满意度与更好的身体和心理健康有关,相关性需求的满意度与家庭和社区繁荣程度的提高有关,能力满意度与心理困扰的减少有关。结果还显示,与非土著雇员相比,土著雇员对自主性、能力和亲情需求的满意度较低。调节分析表明,工作中的相关性对非土著雇员与社区的联系尤为重要,土著雇员的高能力满意度也是如此。这些研究结果将在自决理论的背景下进行讨论,并对希望改善其土著和非土著员工福利的组织产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Transcultural Psychiatry is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on cultural psychiatry and mental health. Cultural psychiatry is concerned with the social and cultural determinants of psychopathology and psychosocial treatments of the range of mental and behavioural problems in individuals, families and human groups. In addition to the clinical research methods of psychiatry, it draws from the disciplines of psychiatric epidemiology, medical anthropology and cross-cultural psychology.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of resettled Iraqi and Syrian refugee young people and families with a mental health triage and assessment service. Activist burnout in No Borders: The case of a highly diverse movement. Perceptions of youth internalizing symptoms: Cross-cultural comparisons between Taiwanese and U.S. mothers. Help-seeking intentions and depression treatment beliefs amongst Sri Lankan Australians: A survey following a mental health literacy framework. Is it pathological to believe conspiracy theories?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1