Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: A Focused Review

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seminars in Pediatric Neurology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.spen.2022.100976
Valentina Caceres , Thomas Murray , Cortlandt Myers , Kareesma Parbhoo
{"title":"Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: A Focused Review","authors":"Valentina Caceres ,&nbsp;Thomas Murray ,&nbsp;Cortlandt Myers ,&nbsp;Kareesma Parbhoo","doi":"10.1016/j.spen.2022.100976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Given the advancements in prenatal testing, child neurologists are becoming involved in earlier stages of patient care, often being consulted during the gestational stage rather than during the postnatal period<span><span><span><span>. Thus, it is essential that pediatric<span> neurologists understand the strengths and limitations of prenatal testing when counseling families. In this review we separate prenatal testing into screening and diagnostic testing. On the one hand, screening testing is noninvasive and does not have an increased risk for miscarriage. Diagnostic tests, on the other hand, are invasive and include chorionic villus sampling and </span></span>amniocentesis<span>. Understanding that screening tests are not diagnostic is imperative, therefore, attention should be placed on the positive and negative predictive values when interpreting results within the clinical context. Given their invasive nature, prenatal diagnostic tests increase the risk for complications such as miscarriage. Diagnostic tests include </span></span>biochemical marker testing, enzyme testing, </span>karyotype, microarray, </span></span>whole exome sequencing<span>, and whole genome sequencing. With each test, pretest and post-test counseling is crucial for informed decision making, and the strengths and limitations should be discussed when obtaining consent. Prior to obtaining testing, clinicians must consider unexpected and unrelated findings of testing and must acknowledge that the patient always has the option to decline the test.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49284,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Pediatric Neurology","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Pediatric Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071909122000249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Given the advancements in prenatal testing, child neurologists are becoming involved in earlier stages of patient care, often being consulted during the gestational stage rather than during the postnatal period. Thus, it is essential that pediatric neurologists understand the strengths and limitations of prenatal testing when counseling families. In this review we separate prenatal testing into screening and diagnostic testing. On the one hand, screening testing is noninvasive and does not have an increased risk for miscarriage. Diagnostic tests, on the other hand, are invasive and include chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. Understanding that screening tests are not diagnostic is imperative, therefore, attention should be placed on the positive and negative predictive values when interpreting results within the clinical context. Given their invasive nature, prenatal diagnostic tests increase the risk for complications such as miscarriage. Diagnostic tests include biochemical marker testing, enzyme testing, karyotype, microarray, whole exome sequencing, and whole genome sequencing. With each test, pretest and post-test counseling is crucial for informed decision making, and the strengths and limitations should be discussed when obtaining consent. Prior to obtaining testing, clinicians must consider unexpected and unrelated findings of testing and must acknowledge that the patient always has the option to decline the test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前基因检测和筛查:重点综述
鉴于产前检测的进步,儿童神经科医生正在参与患者护理的早期阶段,通常在妊娠期而不是在产后咨询。因此,儿科神经科医生在咨询家庭时了解产前检查的优势和局限性是至关重要的。在本综述中,我们将产前检测分为筛查和诊断检测。一方面,筛查测试是非侵入性的,不会增加流产的风险。另一方面,诊断测试是侵入性的,包括绒毛膜绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术。了解筛查试验不是诊断是必要的,因此,在临床背景下解释结果时,应注意阳性和阴性预测值。鉴于其侵入性,产前诊断检查增加了流产等并发症的风险。诊断测试包括生化标记测试、酶测试、核型、微阵列、全外显子组测序和全基因组测序。对于每次测试,测试前和测试后的咨询对于知情决策至关重要,并且在获得同意时应讨论其优点和局限性。在进行检测之前,临床医生必须考虑检测的意外和不相关的发现,并且必须承认患者总是有拒绝检测的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Pediatric Neurology is a topical journal that focuses on subjects of current importance in the field of pediatric neurology. The journal is devoted to making the status of such topics and the results of new investigations readily available to the practicing physician. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology is of special interest to pediatric neurologists, pediatric neuropathologists, behavioral pediatricians, and neurologists who treat all ages.
期刊最新文献
Ataxia telangiectasia Chedíak-Higashi Syndrome: Hair-to-toe spectrum Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: A pediatric-focused review Neurofibromatosis type 1 - an update Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis - An update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1